Baseline UI V2

Baseline UI

Overview

This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/baseline-ui from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.

Baseline UI Enforces an opinionated UI baseline to prevent AI-generated interface slop.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: How to use, Stack, Components, Interaction, Animation, Typography.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• You are building or reviewing Tailwind-based UI and want a strict baseline for accessibility, motion, typography, and layout.
• The task is to prevent generic or sloppy AI-generated interface decisions before they spread through the codebase.
• You need concrete UI constraints to apply to a file review or an ongoing frontend implementation.
• Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Validates animation durations, enforces typography scale, checks component accessibility, and prevents layout anti-patterns in Tailwind CSS projects. Use when building UI components, reviewing CSS utilities, styling....
• Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
• Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.

Operating Table

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
2. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
3. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
4. Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
5. Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
6. Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
7. Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: How to use

• /baseline-ui Apply these constraints to any UI work in this conversation.

• /baseline-ui <file> Review the file against all constraints below and output:

  • violations (quote the exact line/snippet)
  • why it matters (1 short sentence)
  • a concrete fix (code-level suggestion)

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @baseline-ui-v2 to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @baseline-ui-v2 against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @baseline-ui-v2 for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @baseline-ui-v2 using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
• Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
• Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
• Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
• Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
• Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/baseline-ui, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @00-andruia-consultant - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @00-andruia-consultant-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Stack

• MUST use Tailwind CSS defaults unless custom values already exist or are explicitly requested
• MUST use motion/react (formerly framer-motion) when JavaScript animation is required
• SHOULD use tw-animate-css for entrance and micro-animations in Tailwind CSS
• MUST use cn utility (clsx + tailwind-merge) for class logic

Imported: Components

• MUST use accessible component primitives for anything with keyboard or focus behavior (Base UI, React Aria, Radix)
• MUST use the project’s existing component primitives first
• NEVER mix primitive systems within the same interaction surface
• SHOULD prefer Base UI for new primitives if compatible with the stack
• MUST add an aria-label to icon-only buttons
• NEVER rebuild keyboard or focus behavior by hand unless explicitly requested

Imported: Interaction

• MUST use an AlertDialog for destructive or irreversible actions
• SHOULD use structural skeletons for loading states
• NEVER use h-screen, use h-dvh
• MUST respect safe-area-inset for fixed elements
• MUST show errors next to where the action happens
• NEVER block paste in input or textarea elements

Imported: Animation

• NEVER add animation unless it is explicitly requested
• MUST animate only compositor props (transform, opacity)
• NEVER animate layout properties (width, height, top, left, margin, padding)
• SHOULD avoid animating paint properties (background, color) except for small, local UI (text, icons)
• SHOULD use ease-out on entrance
• NEVER exceed 200ms for interaction feedback
• MUST pause looping animations when off-screen
• SHOULD respect prefers-reduced-motion
• NEVER introduce custom easing curves unless explicitly requested
• SHOULD avoid animating large images or full-screen surfaces

Imported: Typography

• MUST use text-balance for headings and text-pretty for body/paragraphs
• MUST use tabular-nums for data
• SHOULD use truncate or line-clamp for dense UI
• NEVER modify letter-spacing (tracking-*) unless explicitly requested

Imported: Layout

• MUST use a fixed z-index scale (no arbitrary z-*)
• SHOULD use size-* for square elements instead of w-* + h-*

Imported: Performance

• NEVER animate large blur() or backdrop-filter surfaces
• NEVER apply will-change outside an active animation
• NEVER use useEffect for anything that can be expressed as render logic

Imported: Design

• NEVER use gradients unless explicitly requested
• NEVER use purple or multicolor gradients
• NEVER use glow effects as primary affordances
• SHOULD use Tailwind CSS default shadow scale unless explicitly requested
• MUST give empty states one clear next action
• SHOULD limit accent color usage to one per view
• SHOULD use existing theme or Tailwind CSS color tokens before introducing new ones

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.