Bitbucket Automation

Bitbucket Automation via Rube MCP

Overview

This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/bitbucket-automation from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.

Bitbucket Automation via Rube MCP Automate Bitbucket operations including repository management, pull request workflows, branch operations, issue tracking, and workspace administration through Composio's Bitbucket toolkit.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Prerequisites, Common Patterns, Known Pitfalls, Limitations.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
• Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Automate Bitbucket repositories, pull requests, branches, issues, and workspace management via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
• Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
• Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
• Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
• Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.

Operating Table

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming RUBESEARCHTOOLS responds
2. Call RUBEMANAGECONNECTIONS with toolkit bitbucket
3. If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete Bitbucket OAuth
4. Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows
5. BITBUCKETLISTWORKSPACES - Discover accessible workspaces [Prerequisite]
6. BITBUCKETLISTREPOSITORIESINWORKSPACE - Find the target repository [Prerequisite]
7. BITBUCKETLISTBRANCHES - Verify source and destination branches exist [Prerequisite]

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Setup

Get Rube MCP: Add https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.

1. Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS responds
2. Call RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS with toolkit bitbucket
3. If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete Bitbucket OAuth
4. Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows

Imported: Core Workflows

1. Manage Pull Requests

When to use: User wants to create, review, or inspect pull requests

Tool sequence:

1. BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACES - Discover accessible workspaces [Prerequisite]
2. BITBUCKET_LIST_REPOSITORIES_IN_WORKSPACE - Find the target repository [Prerequisite]
3. BITBUCKET_LIST_BRANCHES - Verify source and destination branches exist [Prerequisite]
4. BITBUCKET_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST - Create a new PR with title, source branch, and optional reviewers [Required]
5. BITBUCKET_LIST_PULL_REQUESTS - List PRs filtered by state (OPEN, MERGED, DECLINED) [Optional]
6. BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST - Get full details of a specific PR by ID [Optional]
7. BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF - Fetch unified diff for code review [Optional]
8. BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFFSTAT - Get changed files with lines added/removed [Optional]

Key parameters:

• workspace: Workspace slug or UUID (required for all operations)
• repo_slug: URL-friendly repository name
• source_branch: Branch with changes to merge
• destination_branch: Target branch (defaults to repo main branch if omitted)
• reviewers: List of objects with uuid field for reviewer assignment
• state: Filter for LIST_PULL_REQUESTS - OPEN, MERGED, or DECLINED
• max_chars: Truncation limit for GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF to handle large diffs

Pitfalls:

• reviewers expects an array of objects with uuid key, NOT usernames: [{"uuid": "{...}"}]
• UUID format must include curly braces: {123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000}
• destination_branch defaults to the repo's main branch if omitted, which may not be main
• pull_request_id is an integer for GET/DIFF operations but comes back as part of PR listing
• Large diffs can overwhelm context; always set max_chars (e.g., 50000) on GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF

2. Manage Repositories and Workspaces

When to use: User wants to list, create, or delete repositories or explore workspaces

Tool sequence:

1. BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACES - List all accessible workspaces [Required]
2. BITBUCKET_LIST_REPOSITORIES_IN_WORKSPACE - List repos with optional BBQL filtering [Required]
3. BITBUCKET_CREATE_REPOSITORY - Create a new repo with language, privacy, and project settings [Optional]
4. BITBUCKET_DELETE_REPOSITORY - Permanently delete a repository (irreversible) [Optional]
5. BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACE_MEMBERS - List members for reviewer assignment or access checks [Optional]

Key parameters:

• workspace: Workspace slug (find via LIST_WORKSPACES)
• repo_slug: URL-friendly name for create/delete
• q: BBQL query filter (e.g., name~"api", project.key="PROJ", is_private=true)
• role: Filter repos by user role: member, contributor, admin, owner
• sort: Sort field with optional - prefix for descending (e.g., -updated_on)
• is_private: Boolean for repository visibility (defaults to true)
• project_key: Bitbucket project key; omit to use workspace's oldest project

Pitfalls:

• BITBUCKET_DELETE_REPOSITORY is irreversible and does not affect forks
• BBQL string values MUST be enclosed in double quotes: name~"my-repo" not name~my-repo
• repository is NOT a valid BBQL field; use name instead
• Default pagination is 10 results; set pagelen explicitly for complete listings
• CREATE_REPOSITORY defaults to private; set is_private: false for public repos

3. Manage Issues

When to use: User wants to create, update, list, or comment on repository issues

Tool sequence:

1. BITBUCKET_LIST_ISSUES - List issues with optional filters for state, priority, kind, assignee [Required]
2. BITBUCKET_CREATE_ISSUE - Create a new issue with title, content, priority, and kind [Required]
3. BITBUCKET_UPDATE_ISSUE - Modify issue attributes (state, priority, assignee, etc.) [Optional]
4. BITBUCKET_CREATE_ISSUE_COMMENT - Add a markdown comment to an existing issue [Optional]
5. BITBUCKET_DELETE_ISSUE - Permanently delete an issue [Optional]

Key parameters:

• issue_id: String identifier for the issue
• title, content: Required for creation
• kind: bug, enhancement, proposal, or task
• priority: trivial, minor, major, critical, or blocker
• state: new, open, resolved, on hold, invalid, duplicate, wontfix, closed
• assignee: Bitbucket username for CREATE; assignee_account_id (UUID) for UPDATE
• due_on: ISO 8601 format date string

Pitfalls:

• Issue tracker must be enabled on the repository (has_issues: true) or API calls will fail
• CREATE_ISSUE uses assignee (username string), but UPDATE_ISSUE uses assignee_account_id (UUID) -- they are different fields
• DELETE_ISSUE is permanent with no undo
• state values include spaces: "on hold" not "on_hold"
• Filtering by assignee in LIST_ISSUES uses account ID, not username; use "null" string for unassigned

4. Manage Branches

When to use: User wants to create branches or explore branch structure

Tool sequence:

1. BITBUCKET_LIST_BRANCHES - List branches with optional BBQL filter and sorting [Required]
2. BITBUCKET_CREATE_BRANCH - Create a new branch from a specific commit hash [Required]

Key parameters:

• name: Branch name without refs/heads/ prefix (e.g., feature/new-login)
• target_hash: Full SHA1 commit hash to branch from (must exist in repo)
• q: BBQL filter (e.g., name~"feature/", name="main")
• sort: Sort by name or -target.date (descending commit date)
• pagelen: 1-100 results per page (default is 10)

Pitfalls:

• CREATE_BRANCH requires a full commit hash, NOT a branch name as target_hash
• Do NOT include refs/heads/ prefix in branch names
• Branch names must follow Bitbucket naming conventions (alphanumeric, /, ., _, -)
• BBQL string values need double quotes: name~"feature/" not name~feature/

5. Review Pull Requests with Comments

When to use: User wants to add review comments to pull requests, including inline code comments

Tool sequence:

1. BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST - Get PR details and verify it exists [Prerequisite]
2. BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF - Review the actual code changes [Prerequisite]
3. BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFFSTAT - Get list of changed files [Optional]
4. BITBUCKET_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST_COMMENT - Post review comments [Required]

Key parameters:

• pull_request_id: String ID of the PR
• content_raw: Markdown-formatted comment text
• content_markup: Defaults to markdown; also supports plaintext
• inline: Object with path, from, to for inline code comments
• parent_comment_id: Integer ID for threaded replies to existing comments

Pitfalls:

• pull_request_id is a string in CREATE_PULL_REQUEST_COMMENT but an integer in GET_PULL_REQUEST
• Inline comments require inline.path at minimum; from/to are optional line numbers
• parent_comment_id creates a threaded reply; omit for top-level comments
• Line numbers in inline comments reference the diff, not the source file

Imported: Prerequisites

• Rube MCP must be connected (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS available)
• Active Bitbucket connection via RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS with toolkit bitbucket
• Always call RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS first to get current tool schemas

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @bitbucket-automation to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @bitbucket-automation against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @bitbucket-automation for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @bitbucket-automation using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
• Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
• Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
• Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
• Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
• Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/bitbucket-automation, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @00-andruia-consultant - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @00-andruia-consultant-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Quick Reference

Imported: Common Patterns

ID Resolution

Always resolve human-readable names to IDs before operations:

• Workspace: BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACES to get workspace slugs
• Repository: BITBUCKET_LIST_REPOSITORIES_IN_WORKSPACE with q filter to find repo slugs
• Branch: BITBUCKET_LIST_BRANCHES to verify branch existence before PR creation
• Members: BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACE_MEMBERS to get UUIDs for reviewer assignment

Pagination

Bitbucket uses page-based pagination (not cursor-based):

• Use page (starts at 1) and pagelen (items per page) parameters
• Default page size is typically 10; set pagelen explicitly (max 50 for PRs, 100 for others)
• Check response for next URL or total count to determine if more pages exist
• Always iterate through all pages for complete results

BBQL Filtering

Bitbucket Query Language is available on list endpoints:

• String values MUST use double quotes: name~"pattern"
• Operators: = (exact), ~ (contains), != (not equal), >, >=, <, <=
• Combine with AND / OR: name~"api" AND is_private=true

Imported: Known Pitfalls

ID Formats

• Workspace: slug string (e.g., my-workspace) or UUID in braces ({uuid})
• Reviewer UUIDs must include curly braces: {123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000}
• Issue IDs are strings; PR IDs are integers in some tools, strings in others
• Commit hashes must be full SHA1 (40 characters)

Parameter Quirks

• assignee vs assignee_account_id: CREATE_ISSUE uses username, UPDATE_ISSUE uses UUID
• state values for issues include spaces: "on hold", not "on_hold"
• destination_branch omission defaults to repo main branch, not main literally
• BBQL repository is not a valid field -- use name

Rate Limits

• Bitbucket Cloud API has rate limits; large batch operations should include delays
• Paginated requests count against rate limits; minimize unnecessary page fetches

Destructive Operations

• BITBUCKET_DELETE_REPOSITORY is irreversible and does not remove forks
• BITBUCKET_DELETE_ISSUE is permanent with no recovery option
• Always confirm with the user before executing delete operations

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.