Conductor Revert

Revert Track

Overview

This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/conductor-revert from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.

Revert Track Revert changes by logical work unit with full git awareness. Supports reverting entire tracks, specific phases, or individual tasks.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Pre-flight Checks, Target Selection, Commit Discovery, Execution Plan Display, Revert Execution, Plan.md Updates.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• Working on revert track tasks or workflows
• Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for revert track
• The task is unrelated to revert track
• You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
• Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Git-aware undo by logical work unit (track, phase, or task).
• Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.

Operating Table

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
2. Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
3. Provide actionable steps and verification.
4. If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.
5. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
6. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
7. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Instructions

• Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
• Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
• Provide actionable steps and verification.
• If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

Imported: Pre-flight Checks

1. Verify Conductor is initialized:

   • Check conductor/tracks.md exists
   • If missing: Display error and suggest running /conductor:setup first

2. Verify git repository:

   • Run git status to confirm git repo

   • Check for uncommitted changes

   • If uncommitted changes exist:

     WARNING: Uncommitted changes detected
     
     Files with changes:
     {list of files}
     
     Options:
     1. Stash changes and continue
     2. Commit changes first
     3. Cancel revert
     

3. Verify git is clean enough to revert:

   • No merge in progress
   • No rebase in progress
   • If issues found: Halt and explain resolution steps

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @conductor-revert to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @conductor-revert against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @conductor-revert for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @conductor-revert using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• NEVER use git reset --hard - Only use git revert
• NEVER use git push --force - Only safe push operations
• NEVER auto-resolve conflicts - Always halt for human intervention
• ALWAYS show full plan - User must see exactly what will happen
• REQUIRE explicit 'YES' - Not 'y', not enter, only 'YES'
• HALT on ANY error - Do not attempt to continue past failures
• PRESERVE history - Revert commits are preferred over history rewriting

Imported Operating Notes

Imported: Safety Rules

1. NEVER use git reset --hard - Only use git revert
2. NEVER use git push --force - Only safe push operations
3. NEVER auto-resolve conflicts - Always halt for human intervention
4. ALWAYS show full plan - User must see exactly what will happen
5. REQUIRE explicit 'YES' - Not 'y', not enter, only 'YES'
6. HALT on ANY error - Do not attempt to continue past failures
7. PRESERVE history - Revert commits are preferred over history rewriting

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/conductor-revert, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @00-andruia-consultant - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @00-andruia-consultant-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Target Selection

If argument provided:

Parse the argument format:

Full track: {trackId}

• Example: auth_20250115
• Reverts all commits for the entire track

Specific phase: {trackId}:phase{N}

• Example: auth_20250115:phase2
• Reverts commits for phase N and all subsequent phases

Specific task: {trackId}:task{X.Y}

• Example: auth_20250115:task2.3
• Reverts commits for task X.Y only

If no argument:

Display guided selection menu:

What would you like to revert?

Currently In Progress:
1. [~] Task 2.3 in dashboard_20250112 (most recent)

Recently Completed:
2. [x] Task 2.2 in dashboard_20250112 (1 hour ago)
3. [x] Phase 1 in dashboard_20250112 (3 hours ago)
4. [x] Full track: auth_20250115 (yesterday)

Options:
5. Enter specific reference (track:phase or track:task)
6. Cancel

Select option:

Imported: Commit Discovery

For Task Revert

1. Search git log for task-specific commits:

   git log --oneline --grep="{trackId}" --grep="Task {X.Y}" --all-match
   

2. Also find the plan.md update commit:

   git log --oneline --grep="mark task {X.Y} complete" --grep="{trackId}" --all-match
   

3. Collect all matching commit SHAs

For Phase Revert

1. Determine task range for the phase by reading plan.md

2. Search for all task commits in that phase:

   git log --oneline --grep="{trackId}" | grep -E "Task {N}\.[0-9]"
   

3. Find phase verification commit if exists

4. Find all plan.md update commits for phase tasks

5. Collect all matching commit SHAs in chronological order

For Full Track Revert

1. Find ALL commits mentioning the track:

   git log --oneline --grep="{trackId}"
   

2. Find track creation commits:

   git log --oneline -- "conductor/tracks/{trackId}/"
   

3. Collect all matching commit SHAs in chronological order

Imported: Execution Plan Display

Before any revert operations, display full plan:

================================================================================
                           REVERT EXECUTION PLAN
================================================================================

Target: {description of what's being reverted}

Commits to revert (in reverse chronological order):
  1. abc1234 - feat: add chart rendering (dashboard_20250112)
  2. def5678 - chore: mark task 2.3 complete (dashboard_20250112)
  3. ghi9012 - feat: add data hooks (dashboard_20250112)
  4. jkl3456 - chore: mark task 2.2 complete (dashboard_20250112)

Files that will be affected:
  - src/components/Dashboard.tsx (modified)
  - src/hooks/useData.ts (will be deleted - was created in these commits)
  - conductor/tracks/dashboard_20250112/plan.md (modified)

Plan updates:
  - Task 2.2: [x] -> [ ]
  - Task 2.3: [~] -> [ ]

================================================================================
                              !! WARNING !!
================================================================================

This operation will:
- Create {N} revert commits
- Modify {M} files
- Reset {P} tasks to pending status

This CANNOT be easily undone without manual intervention.

================================================================================

Type 'YES' to proceed, or anything else to cancel:

CRITICAL: Require explicit 'YES' confirmation. Do not proceed on 'y', 'yes', or enter.

Imported: Revert Execution

Execute reverts in reverse chronological order (newest first):

Executing revert plan...

[1/4] Reverting abc1234...
      git revert --no-edit abc1234
      ✓ Success

[2/4] Reverting def5678...
      git revert --no-edit def5678
      ✓ Success

[3/4] Reverting ghi9012...
      git revert --no-edit ghi9012
      ✓ Success

[4/4] Reverting jkl3456...
      git revert --no-edit jkl3456
      ✓ Success

On Merge Conflict

If any revert produces a merge conflict:

================================================================================
                           MERGE CONFLICT DETECTED
================================================================================

Conflict occurred while reverting: {sha} - {message}

Conflicted files:
  - src/components/Dashboard.tsx

Options:
1. Show conflict details
2. Abort revert sequence (keeps completed reverts)
3. Open manual resolution guide

IMPORTANT: Reverts 1-{N} have been completed. You may need to manually
resolve this conflict before continuing or fully undo the revert sequence.

Select option:

HALT immediately on any conflict. Do not attempt automatic resolution.

Imported: Plan.md Updates

After successful git reverts, update plan.md:

1. Read current plan.md
2. For each reverted task, change marker:
   • [x] -> [ ]
   • [~] -> [ ]
3. Write updated plan.md
4. Update metadata.json:
   • Decrement tasks.completed
   • Update status if needed
   • Update updated timestamp

Do NOT commit plan.md changes - they are part of the revert operation

Imported: Track Status Updates

If reverting entire track:

• In tracks.md: Change [x] or [~] to [ ]
• Consider offering to delete the track directory entirely

If reverting to incomplete state:

• In tracks.md: Ensure marked as [~] if partially complete, [ ] if fully reverted

Imported: Verification

After revert completion:

================================================================================
                           REVERT COMPLETE
================================================================================

Summary:
  - Reverted {N} commits
  - Reset {P} tasks to pending
  - {M} files affected

Git log now shows:
  {recent commit history}

Plan.md status:
  - Task 2.2: [ ] Pending
  - Task 2.3: [ ] Pending

================================================================================

Verify the revert was successful:
  1. Run tests: {test command}
  2. Check application: {relevant check}

If issues are found, you may need to:
  - Fix conflicts manually
  - Re-implement the reverted tasks
  - Use 'git revert HEAD~{N}..HEAD' to undo the reverts

================================================================================

Imported: Edge Cases

Track Never Committed

No commits found for track: {trackId}

The track exists but has no associated commits. This may mean:
- Implementation never started
- Commits used different format

Options:
1. Delete track directory only
2. Cancel

Commits Already Reverted

Some commits appear to already be reverted:
  - abc1234 was reverted by xyz9876

Options:
1. Skip already-reverted commits
2. Cancel and investigate

Remote Already Pushed

WARNING: Some commits have been pushed to remote

Commits on remote:
  - abc1234 (origin/main)
  - def5678 (origin/main)

Reverting will create new revert commits that you'll need to push.
This is the safe approach (no force push required).

Continue with revert? (YES/no):

Imported: Undo the Revert

If user needs to undo the revert itself:

To undo this revert operation:

  git revert HEAD~{N}..HEAD

This will create new commits that restore the reverted changes.

Alternatively, if not yet pushed:
  git reset --soft HEAD~{N}
  git checkout -- .

(Use with caution - this discards the revert commits)

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.