Development V2

Development Workflow Bundle

Overview

This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/development from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.

Development Workflow Bundle

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Quality Gates, Limitations.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• Building new web or mobile applications
• Adding features to existing applications
• Refactoring or modernizing legacy code
• Setting up new projects with best practices
• Full-stack feature development
• Cross-platform application development

Operating Table

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. app-builder - Main application building orchestrator
2. senior-fullstack - Full-stack development guidance
3. environment-setup-guide - Development environment setup
4. concise-planning - Task planning and breakdown
5. Determine project type (web, mobile, full-stack)
6. Select technology stack
7. Scaffold project structure

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Workflow Phases

Phase 1: Project Setup and Scaffolding

Skills to Invoke

• app-builder - Main application building orchestrator
• senior-fullstack - Full-stack development guidance
• environment-setup-guide - Development environment setup
• concise-planning - Task planning and breakdown

Actions

1. Determine project type (web, mobile, full-stack)
2. Select technology stack
3. Scaffold project structure
4. Configure development environment
5. Set up version control and CI/CD

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @app-builder to scaffold a new React + Node.js full-stack application

Use @senior-fullstack to set up a Next.js 14 project with App Router

Use @environment-setup-guide to configure my development environment

Phase 2: Frontend Development

Skills to Invoke

• frontend-developer - React/Next.js component development
• frontend-design - UI/UX design implementation
• react-patterns - Modern React patterns
• typescript-pro - TypeScript best practices
• tailwind-patterns - Tailwind CSS styling
• nextjs-app-router-patterns - Next.js 14+ patterns

Actions

1. Design component architecture
2. Implement UI components
3. Set up state management
4. Configure routing
5. Apply styling and theming
6. Implement responsive design

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @frontend-developer to create a dashboard component with React and TypeScript

Use @react-patterns to implement proper state management with Zustand

Use @tailwind-patterns to style components with a consistent design system

Phase 3: Backend Development

Skills to Invoke

• backend-architect - Backend architecture design
• backend-dev-guidelines - Backend development standards
• nodejs-backend-patterns - Node.js/Express patterns
• fastapi-pro - FastAPI development
• api-design-principles - REST/GraphQL API design
• auth-implementation-patterns - Authentication implementation

Actions

1. Design API architecture
2. Implement REST/GraphQL endpoints
3. Set up database connections
4. Implement authentication/authorization
5. Configure middleware
6. Set up error handling

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @backend-architect to design a microservices architecture for my application

Use @nodejs-backend-patterns to create Express.js API endpoints

Use @auth-implementation-patterns to implement JWT authentication

Phase 4: Database Development

Skills to Invoke

• database-architect - Database design
• database-design - Schema design principles
• prisma-expert - Prisma ORM
• postgresql - PostgreSQL optimization
• neon-postgres - Serverless Postgres

Actions

1. Design database schema
2. Create migrations
3. Set up ORM
4. Optimize queries
5. Configure connection pooling

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @database-architect to design a normalized schema for an e-commerce platform

Use @prisma-expert to set up Prisma ORM with TypeScript

Phase 5: Testing

Skills to Invoke

• test-driven-development - TDD workflow
• javascript-testing-patterns - Jest/Vitest testing
• python-testing-patterns - pytest testing
• e2e-testing-patterns - Playwright/Cypress E2E
• playwright-skill - Browser automation testing

Actions

1. Write unit tests
2. Create integration tests
3. Set up E2E tests
4. Configure CI test runners
5. Achieve coverage targets

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @test-driven-development to implement features with TDD

Use @playwright-skill to create E2E tests for critical user flows

Phase 6: Code Quality and Review

Skills to Invoke

• code-reviewer - AI-powered code review
• clean-code - Clean code principles
• lint-and-validate - Linting and validation
• security-scanning-security-sast - Static security analysis

Actions

1. Run linters and formatters
2. Perform code review
3. Fix code quality issues
4. Run security scans
5. Address vulnerabilities

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @code-reviewer to review my pull request

Use @lint-and-validate to check code quality

Phase 7: Build and Deployment

Skills to Invoke

• deployment-engineer - Deployment orchestration
• docker-expert - Containerization
• vercel-deployment - Vercel deployment
• github-actions-templates - CI/CD workflows
• cicd-automation-workflow-automate - CI/CD automation

Actions

1. Create Dockerfiles
2. Configure build pipelines
3. Set up deployment workflows
4. Configure environment variables
5. Deploy to production

Copy-Paste Prompts

Use @docker-expert to containerize my application

Use @vercel-deployment to deploy my Next.js app to production

Use @github-actions-templates to set up CI/CD pipeline

Imported: Technology-Specific Workflows

React/Next.js Development

Skills: frontend-developer, react-patterns, nextjs-app-router-patterns, typescript-pro, tailwind-patterns

Python/FastAPI Development

Skills: fastapi-pro, python-pro, python-patterns, pydantic-models-py

Node.js/Express Development

Skills: nodejs-backend-patterns, javascript-pro, typescript-pro, express (via nodejs-backend-patterns)

Full-Stack Development

Skills: senior-fullstack, app-builder, frontend-developer, backend-architect, database-architect

Mobile Development

Skills: mobile-developer, react-native-architecture, flutter-expert, ios-developer

Imported: Related Workflow Bundles

• wordpress - WordPress-specific development
• security-audit - Security testing workflow
• testing-qa - Comprehensive testing workflow
• documentation - Documentation generation workflow

Imported: Overview

Consolidated workflow for end-to-end software development covering web, mobile, and backend development. This bundle orchestrates skills for building production-ready applications from scaffolding to deployment.

Imported: Quality Gates

Before moving to next phase, verify:

• All tests passing
• Code review completed
• Security scan passed
• Linting/formatting clean
• Documentation updated

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @development-v2 to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @development-v2 against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @development-v2 for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @development-v2 using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
• Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
• Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
• Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
• Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
• Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/development, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @00-andruia-consultant - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @00-andruia-consultant-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @10-andruia-skill-smith-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.