SEO Content Skill
Purpose
Evaluate content quality through the lens of Google's E-E-A-T framework, modern content quality signals, and AI citation readiness (GEO). This skill assesses whether content meets the standards required for strong organic rankings and visibility in AI-generated search results (Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT search).
E-E-A-T Scoring Model
Weight Distribution
| Signal |
Weight |
Rationale |
| Experience |
20% |
First-hand experience signals authenticity and practical value |
| Expertise |
25% |
Demonstrated subject-matter depth drives topical authority |
| Authoritativeness |
25% |
External validation and recognition establish domain credibility |
| Trustworthiness |
30% |
The foundation; without trust, other signals lose impact |
Note: Trustworthiness receives the highest weight because Google's Quality Rater Guidelines explicitly state: "Trust is the most important member of the E-E-A-T family."
Experience (20 points)
Demonstrates that the content creator has first-hand, real-world experience with the topic.
| Signal |
What to Check |
Points |
| First-person narratives |
"I tested this...", "In my experience...", "When I built..." |
4 |
| Original data or research |
Proprietary surveys, experiments, case studies with real numbers |
4 |
| Specific examples |
Named tools, specific configurations, exact steps taken |
3 |
| Visual proof |
Screenshots, photos, videos showing hands-on experience |
3 |
| Timeline references |
"Over the past 3 years...", "Since 2021..." |
2 |
| Practical tips |
Advice that only comes from doing, not just researching |
2 |
| Limitations disclosed |
Honest about what did not work or constraints encountered |
2 |
Expertise (25 points)
Demonstrates deep subject-matter knowledge and technical competence.
| Signal |
What to Check |
Points |
| Technical depth |
Content goes beyond surface level; explains "why" not just "what" |
5 |
| Author credentials |
Author bio with relevant qualifications, certifications, roles |
4 |
| Accurate information |
Facts are correct, up to date, and verifiable |
4 |
| Nuanced analysis |
Acknowledges complexity, trade-offs, and context-dependent answers |
3 |
| Industry terminology |
Correct use of domain-specific terms (not keyword stuffing) |
3 |
| Comprehensive coverage |
Addresses the topic fully; no obvious gaps |
3 |
| Methodology transparency |
Explains how conclusions were reached |
3 |
Authoritativeness (25 points)
Demonstrates that the site, brand, or author is a recognized authority on the topic.
| Signal |
What to Check |
Points |
| Outbound citations |
Links to authoritative sources (academic, industry leaders, government) |
5 |
| Inbound link profile |
(When available) Other authoritative sites link to this content |
4 |
| Author recognition |
Author is known in the industry; has other published work |
4 |
| Brand authority signals |
About page, team page, company history, media mentions |
3 |
| Content depth across topic |
Multiple related articles showing topical cluster coverage |
3 |
| Social proof |
Testimonials, case studies, client logos, partnerships |
3 |
| Consistent publishing |
Regular content updates showing ongoing commitment to topic |
3 |
Trustworthiness (30 points)
Demonstrates that the content, site, and organization can be trusted.
| Signal |
What to Check |
Points |
| HTTPS enforced |
Site uses HTTPS with valid certificate |
4 |
| Contact information |
Physical address, phone number, or clear contact form |
4 |
| Privacy policy |
Linked and comprehensive |
3 |
| Terms of service |
Present and accessible |
2 |
| Editorial policy |
Content review process disclosed |
3 |
| Date transparency |
Published date and last updated date visible |
3 |
| Source attribution |
Claims are backed with citations or links |
4 |
| Error correction |
Corrections or updates noted when content changes |
2 |
| No deceptive practices |
No misleading headlines, bait-and-switch, or hidden affiliates |
3 |
| Advertising transparency |
Sponsored content and affiliate links clearly disclosed |
2 |
Word Count Analysis by Page Type
| Page Type |
Minimum |
Optimal Range |
Maximum Before Concern |
| Blog Post (informational) |
800 |
1,500 to 2,500 |
5,000+ (check for fluff) |
| Blog Post (how-to/tutorial) |
1,000 |
2,000 to 3,000 |
6,000+ (check readability) |
| Blog Post (listicle) |
600 |
1,000 to 2,000 |
4,000+ (check item depth) |
| Landing Page |
300 |
500 to 1,000 |
2,000+ (check conversion focus) |
| Product Page |
200 |
300 to 800 |
1,500+ (check buying intent focus) |
| Category Page |
100 |
200 to 500 |
1,000+ (check user intent) |
| Homepage |
300 |
500 to 1,000 |
2,000+ (check focus) |
| Pillar Page |
2,000 |
3,000 to 5,000 |
10,000+ (check navigation) |
| FAQ Page |
500 |
1,000 to 2,000 |
3,000+ (check relevance) |
| About Page |
300 |
500 to 1,000 |
2,000+ (check focus) |
Readability Assessment
Flesch Reading Ease Score
| Score Range |
Difficulty Level |
Target Audience |
Assessment |
| 90-100 |
Very Easy |
5th grade |
Too simple for most B2B content |
| 80-89 |
Easy |
6th grade |
Consumer content, broad audience |
| 70-79 |
Fairly Easy |
7th grade |
Good for general web content |
| 60-69 |
Standard |
8th-9th grade |
Optimal for most informational content |
| 50-59 |
Fairly Difficult |
10th-12th grade |
Acceptable for technical/professional |
| 30-49 |
Difficult |
College |
Only for highly technical audiences |
| 0-29 |
Very Difficult |
College graduate |
Likely too complex; consider simplifying |
Readability Checks
| Check |
Target |
Severity |
| Flesch Reading Ease |
60-70 for general; 50-60 for technical |
Medium |
| Average sentence length |
15-20 words |
Medium |
| Paragraph length |
2-4 sentences (or 40-80 words) |
Low |
| Passive voice usage |
Under 10% of sentences |
Low |
| Transition words |
Present in at least 30% of sentences |
Low |
| Subheading frequency |
One every 200-300 words |
Medium |
| Bullet/list usage |
At least one list per 500 words of content |
Low |
| Short paragraphs |
No single paragraph exceeds 150 words |
Medium |
Keyword Optimization
| Check |
Pass Criteria |
Severity |
| Primary keyword in title |
Within first 60 characters of title tag |
High |
| Primary keyword in H1 |
Present in visible H1 text |
High |
| Primary keyword in first 100 words |
Appears naturally in opening paragraph |
High |
| Primary keyword density |
1-2% (natural usage) |
Medium |
| No keyword stuffing |
Density under 3%; reads naturally |
High |
| Secondary keywords present |
2-3 related keywords used throughout |
Medium |
| Semantic variations (LSI) |
Synonyms and related terms used naturally |
Medium |
| Keyword in URL |
Present in URL slug |
Medium |
| Keyword in meta description |
Included naturally (Google may bold it in SERPs) |
Medium |
| Keyword in image alt text |
At least one image alt contains keyword |
Low |
| Keyword in subheadings |
Present in at least one H2 or H3 |
Medium |
Content Structure Analysis
| Check |
Pass Criteria |
Severity |
| Clear heading hierarchy |
H1 > H2 > H3 (no skipped levels) |
High |
| Table of contents |
Present for content over 2,000 words |
Medium |
| Introduction with hook |
First paragraph establishes topic and reader value |
Medium |
| Conclusion with CTA |
Clear summary and next step for the reader |
Medium |
| Internal links |
3+ links to relevant pages on the same site |
High |
| External links |
2+ links to authoritative external sources |
High |
| Visual content |
At least 1 image per 500 words; tables for data |
Medium |
| FAQ section |
Present for informational content (addresses related queries) |
Medium |
| Scannable format |
Short paragraphs, bullet points, bold key terms |
Medium |
| Content freshness |
Updated within last 12 months (or topic is evergreen) |
Medium |
AI Content Assessment
Per September 2025 Quality Rater Guidelines
Google's position: AI-generated content is acceptable if it is helpful, reliable, and created for people. The focus is on content quality, not content origin.
| Check |
What to Evaluate |
Severity |
| Adds unique value |
Content provides insights, analysis, or perspectives not available elsewhere |
High |
| Not generic filler |
Avoids vague, surface-level content that could apply to any topic |
High |
| Factually accurate |
All claims are verifiable and correct |
Critical |
| Human editorial oversight |
Evidence of human review, editing, and quality control |
High |
| Original analysis |
Not just rephrased from top-ranking competitors |
Medium |
| Personal voice |
Consistent tone and perspective throughout |
Medium |
| No hallucinated facts |
No fabricated statistics, quotes, or citations |
Critical |
| Disclosure (if applicable) |
AI assistance disclosed where required by regulations or policy |
Low |
Content Quality Red Flags
| Red Flag |
What It Indicates |
Severity |
| Generic opening ("In today's world...") |
Low-effort, potentially mass-produced content |
Medium |
| Repetitive phrasing |
Same idea restated multiple ways to inflate word count |
High |
| Vague claims without evidence |
"Many experts say..." without naming experts |
High |
| Perfect grammar with no personality |
Robotic tone, no human voice |
Medium |
| Excessive hedging |
"It could potentially be argued that perhaps..." |
Medium |
| Keyword-first writing |
Content organized around keywords, not user intent |
High |
| No original insights |
Entirely derivative of existing top-ranking content |
High |
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) Signals
AI Search Landscape (Current as of 2025)
| Platform |
Feature |
Impact on SEO |
| Google AI Mode (May 2025) |
Full conversational AI search experience |
Cited sources get visibility; uncited sources lose clicks |
| Google AI Overviews |
AI-generated summaries at top of SERPs |
Sources cited in overviews see increased CTR |
| Perplexity |
AI search engine with source citations |
Direct citations drive referral traffic |
| ChatGPT Search |
OpenAI's web search feature |
Sources influence AI responses |
| Bing Copilot |
Microsoft's AI search integration |
Cited sources displayed alongside AI answers |
Helpful Content System (Merged into Core Ranking March 2024)
The Helpful Content System is no longer a separate ranking system; it was merged into Google's core ranking algorithm in March 2024. The principles remain critical:
| Principle |
What It Means |
Check |
| People-first content |
Written for humans, not search engines |
Does removing SEO terms still make this content worth reading? |
| Satisfying experience |
Reader gets what they came for |
Does the content fully answer the query implied by the title? |
| Demonstrates E-E-A-T |
All four signals present |
See E-E-A-T scoring above |
| Not search-engine-first |
Content not primarily designed to attract search visits |
Would you feel confident sharing this with a friend? |
| Adds value beyond sources |
Not just rephrasing or aggregating |
What does this content provide that source material does not? |
GEO Optimization Checks
| Signal |
Why It Matters for AI Search |
Check |
| Clear, quotable statements |
AI engines extract concise statements for citations |
Content contains 2-3 sentence summaries of key points |
| Structured data (JSON-LD) |
Helps AI understand content semantics |
Schema markup present and accurate |
| Definitive answers |
AI prefers content that directly answers questions |
Key questions answered in 1-2 sentences before elaboration |
| Statistics and data |
AI engines cite sources with specific data points |
Original or properly cited statistics included |
| Author authority |
AI engines prefer citing authoritative sources |
Author bio with credentials, expertise signals present |
| Recency signals |
AI engines prefer current information |
Published date and last updated date visible |
| FAQ format |
Question-answer format is directly extractable by AI |
FAQ section with clear, concise answers |
| Source citations |
Content that cites sources is itself more citable |
Outbound links to authoritative references |
| Topical depth |
AI engines favor comprehensive, in-depth coverage |
Content covers the topic more thoroughly than competitors |
| Unique perspective |
AI engines value novel viewpoints over repetition |
Content includes original analysis, opinions, or data |
Output Format
# Content Quality Assessment: [URL]
**Analyzed:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Page Type:** [blog/landing/product/etc.]
**Word Count:** [N]
**Primary Keyword:** [keyword]
## E-E-A-T Score: XX/100
| Signal | Score | Max | Assessment |
|--------|-------|-----|------------|
| Experience | XX | 20 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |
| Expertise | XX | 25 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |
| Authoritativeness | XX | 25 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |
| Trustworthiness | XX | 30 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |
| **Total** | **XX** | **100** | |
## Content Quality Metrics
| Metric | Value | Target | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Word Count | [N] | [range for page type] | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
| Flesch Reading Ease | [N] | 60-70 | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
| Avg Sentence Length | [N] words | 15-20 | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
| Keyword Density | [N]% | 1-2% | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
| Internal Links | [N] | 3+ | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
| External Links | [N] | 2+ | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
| Images | [N] | 1 per 500 words | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |
## AI Content Assessment
[Evaluation of content quality, originality, and helpfulness per QRG]
## GEO Readiness: XX/100
[Assessment of AI citation readiness, quotable statements, structured data]
## Recommendations
1. [Most impactful improvement]
2. [Second improvement]
3. ...
Usage
# Assess content quality of a page
/seo-content https://example.com/blog/article
# Assess with specific keyword focus
/seo-content https://example.com/blog/article --keyword "saas validation"
# Assess with industry context
/seo-content https://example.com/pricing --industry saas
Notes
- E-E-A-T is not a direct ranking factor but informs the quality signals that are used for ranking
- The Helpful Content System was merged into core ranking in March 2024; it no longer operates as a separate system
- GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is an emerging discipline; best practices will evolve
- Google AI Mode launched in May 2025 and represents a fundamental shift in how search results are displayed
- AI content assessment follows the September 2025 Quality Rater Guidelines: quality matters, not origin
- Word count targets are guidelines, not rules; some topics genuinely require more or fewer words
- Readability scores should match the target audience; B2B SaaS content can be more complex than consumer content
1---2name: seo-content3description: Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment with AI citation readiness scoring. Evaluates Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness alongside word count analysis, readability metrics, keyword optimization, content structure, and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) signals.4---56# SEO Content Skill78## Purpose910Evaluate content quality through the lens of Google's E-E-A-T framework, modern content quality signals, and AI citation readiness (GEO). This skill assesses whether content meets the standards required for strong organic rankings and visibility in AI-generated search results (Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT search).1112---1314## E-E-A-T Scoring Model1516### Weight Distribution1718| Signal | Weight | Rationale |19|--------|--------|-----------|20| **Experience** | 20% | First-hand experience signals authenticity and practical value |21| **Expertise** | 25% | Demonstrated subject-matter depth drives topical authority |22| **Authoritativeness** | 25% | External validation and recognition establish domain credibility |23| **Trustworthiness** | 30% | The foundation; without trust, other signals lose impact |2425> **Note**: Trustworthiness receives the highest weight because Google's Quality Rater Guidelines explicitly state: "Trust is the most important member of the E-E-A-T family."2627---2829### Experience (20 points)3031Demonstrates that the content creator has first-hand, real-world experience with the topic.3233| Signal | What to Check | Points |34|--------|---------------|--------|35| First-person narratives | "I tested this...", "In my experience...", "When I built..." | 4 |36| Original data or research | Proprietary surveys, experiments, case studies with real numbers | 4 |37| Specific examples | Named tools, specific configurations, exact steps taken | 3 |38| Visual proof | Screenshots, photos, videos showing hands-on experience | 3 |39| Timeline references | "Over the past 3 years...", "Since 2021..." | 2 |40| Practical tips | Advice that only comes from doing, not just researching | 2 |41| Limitations disclosed | Honest about what did not work or constraints encountered | 2 |4243---4445### Expertise (25 points)4647Demonstrates deep subject-matter knowledge and technical competence.4849| Signal | What to Check | Points |50|--------|---------------|--------|51| Technical depth | Content goes beyond surface level; explains "why" not just "what" | 5 |52| Author credentials | Author bio with relevant qualifications, certifications, roles | 4 |53| Accurate information | Facts are correct, up to date, and verifiable | 4 |54| Nuanced analysis | Acknowledges complexity, trade-offs, and context-dependent answers | 3 |55| Industry terminology | Correct use of domain-specific terms (not keyword stuffing) | 3 |56| Comprehensive coverage | Addresses the topic fully; no obvious gaps | 3 |57| Methodology transparency | Explains how conclusions were reached | 3 |5859---6061### Authoritativeness (25 points)6263Demonstrates that the site, brand, or author is a recognized authority on the topic.6465| Signal | What to Check | Points |66|--------|---------------|--------|67| Outbound citations | Links to authoritative sources (academic, industry leaders, government) | 5 |68| Inbound link profile | (When available) Other authoritative sites link to this content | 4 |69| Author recognition | Author is known in the industry; has other published work | 4 |70| Brand authority signals | About page, team page, company history, media mentions | 3 |71| Content depth across topic | Multiple related articles showing topical cluster coverage | 3 |72| Social proof | Testimonials, case studies, client logos, partnerships | 3 |73| Consistent publishing | Regular content updates showing ongoing commitment to topic | 3 |7475---7677### Trustworthiness (30 points)7879Demonstrates that the content, site, and organization can be trusted.8081| Signal | What to Check | Points |82|--------|---------------|--------|83| HTTPS enforced | Site uses HTTPS with valid certificate | 4 |84| Contact information | Physical address, phone number, or clear contact form | 4 |85| Privacy policy | Linked and comprehensive | 3 |86| Terms of service | Present and accessible | 2 |87| Editorial policy | Content review process disclosed | 3 |88| Date transparency | Published date and last updated date visible | 3 |89| Source attribution | Claims are backed with citations or links | 4 |90| Error correction | Corrections or updates noted when content changes | 2 |91| No deceptive practices | No misleading headlines, bait-and-switch, or hidden affiliates | 3 |92| Advertising transparency | Sponsored content and affiliate links clearly disclosed | 2 |9394---9596## Word Count Analysis by Page Type9798| Page Type | Minimum | Optimal Range | Maximum Before Concern |99|-----------|---------|---------------|----------------------|100| Blog Post (informational) | 800 | 1,500 to 2,500 | 5,000+ (check for fluff) |101| Blog Post (how-to/tutorial) | 1,000 | 2,000 to 3,000 | 6,000+ (check readability) |102| Blog Post (listicle) | 600 | 1,000 to 2,000 | 4,000+ (check item depth) |103| Landing Page | 300 | 500 to 1,000 | 2,000+ (check conversion focus) |104| Product Page | 200 | 300 to 800 | 1,500+ (check buying intent focus) |105| Category Page | 100 | 200 to 500 | 1,000+ (check user intent) |106| Homepage | 300 | 500 to 1,000 | 2,000+ (check focus) |107| Pillar Page | 2,000 | 3,000 to 5,000 | 10,000+ (check navigation) |108| FAQ Page | 500 | 1,000 to 2,000 | 3,000+ (check relevance) |109| About Page | 300 | 500 to 1,000 | 2,000+ (check focus) |110111---112113## Readability Assessment114115### Flesch Reading Ease Score116117| Score Range | Difficulty Level | Target Audience | Assessment |118|-------------|-----------------|-----------------|------------|119| 90-100 | Very Easy | 5th grade | Too simple for most B2B content |120| 80-89 | Easy | 6th grade | Consumer content, broad audience |121| 70-79 | Fairly Easy | 7th grade | Good for general web content |122| 60-69 | Standard | 8th-9th grade | Optimal for most informational content |123| 50-59 | Fairly Difficult | 10th-12th grade | Acceptable for technical/professional |124| 30-49 | Difficult | College | Only for highly technical audiences |125| 0-29 | Very Difficult | College graduate | Likely too complex; consider simplifying |126127### Readability Checks128129| Check | Target | Severity |130|-------|--------|----------|131| Flesch Reading Ease | 60-70 for general; 50-60 for technical | Medium |132| Average sentence length | 15-20 words | Medium |133| Paragraph length | 2-4 sentences (or 40-80 words) | Low |134| Passive voice usage | Under 10% of sentences | Low |135| Transition words | Present in at least 30% of sentences | Low |136| Subheading frequency | One every 200-300 words | Medium |137| Bullet/list usage | At least one list per 500 words of content | Low |138| Short paragraphs | No single paragraph exceeds 150 words | Medium |139140---141142## Keyword Optimization143144| Check | Pass Criteria | Severity |145|-------|---------------|----------|146| Primary keyword in title | Within first 60 characters of title tag | High |147| Primary keyword in H1 | Present in visible H1 text | High |148| Primary keyword in first 100 words | Appears naturally in opening paragraph | High |149| Primary keyword density | 1-2% (natural usage) | Medium |150| No keyword stuffing | Density under 3%; reads naturally | High |151| Secondary keywords present | 2-3 related keywords used throughout | Medium |152| Semantic variations (LSI) | Synonyms and related terms used naturally | Medium |153| Keyword in URL | Present in URL slug | Medium |154| Keyword in meta description | Included naturally (Google may bold it in SERPs) | Medium |155| Keyword in image alt text | At least one image alt contains keyword | Low |156| Keyword in subheadings | Present in at least one H2 or H3 | Medium |157158---159160## Content Structure Analysis161162| Check | Pass Criteria | Severity |163|-------|---------------|----------|164| Clear heading hierarchy | H1 > H2 > H3 (no skipped levels) | High |165| Table of contents | Present for content over 2,000 words | Medium |166| Introduction with hook | First paragraph establishes topic and reader value | Medium |167| Conclusion with CTA | Clear summary and next step for the reader | Medium |168| Internal links | 3+ links to relevant pages on the same site | High |169| External links | 2+ links to authoritative external sources | High |170| Visual content | At least 1 image per 500 words; tables for data | Medium |171| FAQ section | Present for informational content (addresses related queries) | Medium |172| Scannable format | Short paragraphs, bullet points, bold key terms | Medium |173| Content freshness | Updated within last 12 months (or topic is evergreen) | Medium |174175---176177## AI Content Assessment178179### Per September 2025 Quality Rater Guidelines180181Google's position: AI-generated content is acceptable if it is helpful, reliable, and created for people. The focus is on content quality, not content origin.182183| Check | What to Evaluate | Severity |184|-------|------------------|----------|185| Adds unique value | Content provides insights, analysis, or perspectives not available elsewhere | High |186| Not generic filler | Avoids vague, surface-level content that could apply to any topic | High |187| Factually accurate | All claims are verifiable and correct | Critical |188| Human editorial oversight | Evidence of human review, editing, and quality control | High |189| Original analysis | Not just rephrased from top-ranking competitors | Medium |190| Personal voice | Consistent tone and perspective throughout | Medium |191| No hallucinated facts | No fabricated statistics, quotes, or citations | Critical |192| Disclosure (if applicable) | AI assistance disclosed where required by regulations or policy | Low |193194### Content Quality Red Flags195196| Red Flag | What It Indicates | Severity |197|----------|-------------------|----------|198| Generic opening ("In today's world...") | Low-effort, potentially mass-produced content | Medium |199| Repetitive phrasing | Same idea restated multiple ways to inflate word count | High |200| Vague claims without evidence | "Many experts say..." without naming experts | High |201| Perfect grammar with no personality | Robotic tone, no human voice | Medium |202| Excessive hedging | "It could potentially be argued that perhaps..." | Medium |203| Keyword-first writing | Content organized around keywords, not user intent | High |204| No original insights | Entirely derivative of existing top-ranking content | High |205206---207208## Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) Signals209210### AI Search Landscape (Current as of 2025)211212| Platform | Feature | Impact on SEO |213|----------|---------|---------------|214| **Google AI Mode** (May 2025) | Full conversational AI search experience | Cited sources get visibility; uncited sources lose clicks |215| **Google AI Overviews** | AI-generated summaries at top of SERPs | Sources cited in overviews see increased CTR |216| **Perplexity** | AI search engine with source citations | Direct citations drive referral traffic |217| **ChatGPT Search** | OpenAI's web search feature | Sources influence AI responses |218| **Bing Copilot** | Microsoft's AI search integration | Cited sources displayed alongside AI answers |219220### Helpful Content System (Merged into Core Ranking March 2024)221222The Helpful Content System is no longer a separate ranking system; it was merged into Google's core ranking algorithm in March 2024. The principles remain critical:223224| Principle | What It Means | Check |225|-----------|---------------|-------|226| People-first content | Written for humans, not search engines | Does removing SEO terms still make this content worth reading? |227| Satisfying experience | Reader gets what they came for | Does the content fully answer the query implied by the title? |228| Demonstrates E-E-A-T | All four signals present | See E-E-A-T scoring above |229| Not search-engine-first | Content not primarily designed to attract search visits | Would you feel confident sharing this with a friend? |230| Adds value beyond sources | Not just rephrasing or aggregating | What does this content provide that source material does not? |231232### GEO Optimization Checks233234| Signal | Why It Matters for AI Search | Check |235|--------|------------------------------|-------|236| Clear, quotable statements | AI engines extract concise statements for citations | Content contains 2-3 sentence summaries of key points |237| Structured data (JSON-LD) | Helps AI understand content semantics | Schema markup present and accurate |238| Definitive answers | AI prefers content that directly answers questions | Key questions answered in 1-2 sentences before elaboration |239| Statistics and data | AI engines cite sources with specific data points | Original or properly cited statistics included |240| Author authority | AI engines prefer citing authoritative sources | Author bio with credentials, expertise signals present |241| Recency signals | AI engines prefer current information | Published date and last updated date visible |242| FAQ format | Question-answer format is directly extractable by AI | FAQ section with clear, concise answers |243| Source citations | Content that cites sources is itself more citable | Outbound links to authoritative references |244| Topical depth | AI engines favor comprehensive, in-depth coverage | Content covers the topic more thoroughly than competitors |245| Unique perspective | AI engines value novel viewpoints over repetition | Content includes original analysis, opinions, or data |246247---248249## Output Format250251```markdown252# Content Quality Assessment: [URL]253**Analyzed:** [YYYY-MM-DD]254**Page Type:** [blog/landing/product/etc.]255**Word Count:** [N]256**Primary Keyword:** [keyword]257258## E-E-A-T Score: XX/100259260| Signal | Score | Max | Assessment |261|--------|-------|-----|------------|262| Experience | XX | 20 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |263| Expertise | XX | 25 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |264| Authoritativeness | XX | 25 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |265| Trustworthiness | XX | 30 | [Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing] |266| **Total** | **XX** | **100** | |267268## Content Quality Metrics269270| Metric | Value | Target | Status |271|--------|-------|--------|--------|272| Word Count | [N] | [range for page type] | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |273| Flesch Reading Ease | [N] | 60-70 | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |274| Avg Sentence Length | [N] words | 15-20 | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |275| Keyword Density | [N]% | 1-2% | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |276| Internal Links | [N] | 3+ | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |277| External Links | [N] | 2+ | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |278| Images | [N] | 1 per 500 words | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] |279280## AI Content Assessment281[Evaluation of content quality, originality, and helpfulness per QRG]282283## GEO Readiness: XX/100284[Assessment of AI citation readiness, quotable statements, structured data]285286## Recommendations2871. [Most impactful improvement]2882. [Second improvement]2893. ...290```291292---293294## Usage295296```bash297# Assess content quality of a page298/seo-content https://example.com/blog/article299300# Assess with specific keyword focus301/seo-content https://example.com/blog/article --keyword "saas validation"302303# Assess with industry context304/seo-content https://example.com/pricing --industry saas305```306307---308309## Notes310311- E-E-A-T is not a direct ranking factor but informs the quality signals that are used for ranking312- The Helpful Content System was merged into core ranking in March 2024; it no longer operates as a separate system313- GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is an emerging discipline; best practices will evolve314- Google AI Mode launched in May 2025 and represents a fundamental shift in how search results are displayed315- AI content assessment follows the September 2025 Quality Rater Guidelines: quality matters, not origin316- Word count targets are guidelines, not rules; some topics genuinely require more or fewer words317- Readability scores should match the target audience; B2B SaaS content can be more complex than consumer content