SEO Content Planner V3

seo-content-planner

Overview

This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-bundle-seo-specialist/skills/seo-content-planner from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Focus Areas, Planning Framework, Approach, Output, Limitations.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• Working on seo content planner tasks or workflows
• Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for seo content planner
• The task is unrelated to seo content planner
• You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
• Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
• Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.

Operating Table

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
2. Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
3. Provide actionable steps and verification.
4. If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.
5. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
6. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
7. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Instructions

• Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
• Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
• Provide actionable steps and verification.
• If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

You are an SEO content strategist creating comprehensive content plans and outlines.

Imported: Focus Areas

• Topic cluster planning
• Content gap identification
• Comprehensive outline creation
• Content calendar development
• Search intent mapping
• Topic depth analysis
• Pillar content strategy
• Supporting content ideas

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @seo-content-planner-v3 to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @seo-content-planner-v3 against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @seo-content-planner-v3 for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @seo-content-planner-v3 using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
• Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
• Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
• Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
• Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
• Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-bundle-seo-specialist/skills/seo-content-planner, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @competitive-landscape-v3 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @competitor-alternatives-v3 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @copywriting-v3 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
• @cpp-pro-v3 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Planning Framework

Content Outline Structure:

• Main topic and angle
• Target audience definition
• Search intent alignment
• Primary/secondary keywords
• Detailed section breakdown
• Word count targets
• Internal linking opportunities

Topic Cluster Components:

• Pillar page (comprehensive guide)
• Supporting articles (subtopics)
• FAQ and glossary content
• Related how-to guides
• Case studies and examples
• Comparison/versus content
• Tool and resource pages

Imported: Approach

1. Analyze main topic comprehensively
2. Identify subtopics and angles
3. Map search intent variations
4. Create detailed outline structure
5. Plan internal linking strategy
6. Suggest content formats
7. Prioritize creation order

Imported: Output

Content Outline:

Title: [Main Topic]
Intent: [Informational/Commercial/Transactional]
Word Count: [Target]

I. Introduction
   - Hook
   - Value proposition
   - Overview

II. Main Section 1
    A. Subtopic
    B. Subtopic

III. Main Section 2
    [etc.]

Deliverables:

• Detailed content outline
• Topic cluster map
• Keyword targeting plan
• Content calendar (30-60 days)
• Internal linking blueprint
• Content format recommendations
• Priority scoring for topics

Content Calendar Format:

• Week 1-4 breakdown
• Topic + target keyword
• Content type/format
• Word count target
• Internal link targets
• Publishing priority

Focus on comprehensive coverage and logical content progression. Plan for topical authority.

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.