Gstack Plan Eng Review

GStack Engineering Plan Review Adapter

This is a Codex role-system adapter for Garry Tan's gstack gstack-plan-eng-review method.

When To Use

Use this when:

• an implementation plan is concrete enough to harden;
• architecture is about to open development windows;
• data/API/migration/test/release risk needs review;
• the user explicitly invokes $gstack-plan-eng-review.

Workflow

1. Keep the active role boundary. Do not expand scope just because this gstack method is useful.
2. Read the relevant repo/docs/evidence first when the task depends on current state.
3. Read ../gstack/references/methodology.md if you need the shared method map, then use the section named Architecture And Product Methods.
4. Produce: engineering risks, missing decisions, file boundary refinements, validation plan, and downstream prompt adjustments.
5. Return the result in the active role's normal format, including boundaries, validation, and unresolved decisions when applicable.

Boundaries

• Treat upstream gstack as external methodology, not local-owned project state.
• Do not run upstream gstack runtime, telemetry, browser-cookie import, upgrade checks, or host routing injection automatically.
• Do not create or edit CLAUDE.md, .claude/, .agents/, or upstream routing files unless the user explicitly asks for upstream gstack installation work.
• Do not write files, commit, push, deploy, restart, migrate, clean, delete, or change production unless the active role prompt explicitly allows it.
• Preserve this repository's QA versus 测试 split: formal test cases/reports belong to 测试 and $test-case-report-builder.