DNYoussef /============================================================================/ /* SOURCE-CREDIBILITY-ANALYZER SKILL :: VERILINGUA x VERIX EDITION / /============================================================================*/
name: source-credibility-analyzer version: 2.0 description: | [assert|neutral] Standalone tool for automated source evaluation using program-of-thought scoring rubrics. Outputs credibility (1-5), bias (1-5), and priority (1-5) scores with transparent explanations. Use when evalu [ground:given] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed] category: research tags:
- general author: system cognitive_frame: primary: evidential goal_analysis: first_order: "Execute source-credibility-analyzer workflow" second_order: "Ensure quality and consistency" third_order: "Enable systematic research processes"
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S0 META-IDENTITY / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] SKILL := { name: "source-credibility-analyzer", category: "research", version: "2.0", layer: L1 } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S1 COGNITIVE FRAME / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] COGNITIVE_FRAME := { frame: "Evidential", source: "Turkish", force: "How do you know?" } [ground:cognitive-science] [conf:0.92] [state:confirmed]
Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation)
Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin.
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S2 TRIGGER CONDITIONS / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] TRIGGER_POSITIVE := { keywords: ["source-credibility-analyzer", "research", "workflow"], context: "user needs source-credibility-analyzer capability" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S3 CORE CONTENT / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Source Credibility Analyzer
Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation)
Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin.
Purpose
Automate evaluation of research sources using transparent program-of-thought rubrics. Outputs structured JSON with credibility, bias, and priority scores (1-5) plus explanations showing calculation logic. Can be used as standalone tool OR integrated into general-research-workflow Step 3.
When to Use This Tool
Use this tool when:
- ✅ Evaluating research sources for academic projects
- ✅ Automating source classification (general-research-workflow Step 3)
- ✅ Scoring large batches of sources consistently
- ✅ Getting objective second opinion on source quality
Do NOT use for:
- ❌ Entertainment content (movies, novels) - not designed for this
- ❌ Source quality already obvious (Nature paper = high, random blog = low)
- ❌ Unique/irreplaceable source (only source on obscure topic) - read anyway
Decision Tree: If manual source evaluation takes >10 min → use this tool (saves 15-45 min per source)
Quick Reference
| Step | Objective | Deliverable | Duration | Quality Gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Validate inputs | Confirmed metadata | 30 sec | Required fields present |
| 0.5 | Classify source type | Source category | 1 min | Type assigned |
| 1 | Calculate credibility | Score 1-5 + explanation | 2-5 min | Score justified |
| 2 | Calculate bias | Score 1-5 + explanation | 2-5 min | Score justified |
| 3 | Calculate priority | Score 1-5 + explanation | 1-3 min | Score justified |
| 4 | Resolve conflicts | Final recommendation | 1 min | Logic correct |
| 5 | Generate output | JSON + storage | 1 min | Complete + stored |
Agent Coordination Protocol
Single Agent Execution
- Agent: analyst
- Role: Evaluate source using program-of-thought rubrics
- Workflow: Sequential steps 0 → 0.5 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5
Input Format
{
"title": "[Required]",
"author": "[Required]",
"year": [Required, 1500-2025],
"venue": "[Required]",
"type": "[Required]",
"citations": [Optional],
"doi": "[Optional]",
"url": "[Optional]",
"institution": "[Optional]",
"credentials": "[Optional]"
}
Output Format
{
"source": { ... },
"scores": {
"credibility": {"score": [1-5], "explanation": "..."},
"bias": {"score": [1-5], "explanation": "..."},
"priority": {"score": [1-5], "explanation": "..."}
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "[READ_FIRST | READ_LATER | VERIFY_CLAIMS | SKIP]",
"reason": "...",
"conflicts": "..."
},
"metadata": { ... }
}
Memory MCP Tags
Store with: WHO=analyst, WHEN=[timestamp], PROJECT=[topic], WHY=source-scoring, CREDIBILITY=[score], BIAS=[score], PRIORITY=[score], RECOMMENDATION=[action]
Step-by-Step Workflow
STEP 0: Validate Input Metadata
Agent: analyst Objective: Ensure required metadata is present and valid
Procedure:
Check for ✅ required fields:
title(string, non-empty)author(string, non-empty)year(integer, 1500-2025)venue(string, non-empty)type(string, non-empty)
Note ⚠️ optional fields if present:
citations(improves credibility scoring)doi(improves credibility scoring)institution(improves credibility scoring)credentials(improves credibility scoring)url(for reference)
Validate data types and ranges:
- Year must be integer 1500-2025
- All required strings non-empty
If validation fails → Return error with missing/invalid field name
Deliverable: Validated metadata object
Quality Gate 0:
- GO: All required fields present, year valid (1500-2025)
- NO-GO: Missing/invalid field → Return error to user
STEP 0.5: Classify Source Type (Edge Case Handling)
Agent: analyst Objective: Assign source to appropriate category for rubric baseline
Edge Case Decision Tree:
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S4 SUCCESS CRITERIA / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] SUCCESS_CRITERIA := { primary: "Skill execution completes successfully", quality: "Output meets quality thresholds", verification: "Results validated against requirements" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S5 MCP INTEGRATION / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] MCP_INTEGRATION := { memory_mcp: "Store execution results and patterns", tools: ["mcp__memory-mcp__memory_store", "mcp__memory-mcp__vector_search"] } [ground:witnessed:mcp-config] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S6 MEMORY NAMESPACE / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] MEMORY_NAMESPACE := { pattern: "skills/research/source-credibility-analyzer/{project}/{timestamp}", store: ["executions", "decisions", "patterns"], retrieve: ["similar_tasks", "proven_patterns"] } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
[define|neutral] MEMORY_TAGGING := { WHO: "source-credibility-analyzer-{session_id}", WHEN: "ISO8601_timestamp", PROJECT: "{project_name}", WHY: "skill-execution" } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S7 SKILL COMPLETION VERIFICATION / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[direct|emphatic] COMPLETION_CHECKLIST := { agent_spawning: "Spawn agents via Task()", registry_validation: "Use registry agents only", todowrite_called: "Track progress with TodoWrite", work_delegation: "Delegate to specialized agents" } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S8 ABSOLUTE RULES / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[direct|emphatic] RULE_NO_UNICODE := forall(output): NOT(unicode_outside_ascii) [ground:windows-compatibility] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
[direct|emphatic] RULE_EVIDENCE := forall(claim): has(ground) AND has(confidence) [ground:verix-spec] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
[direct|emphatic] RULE_REGISTRY := forall(agent): agent IN AGENT_REGISTRY [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* PROMISE / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[commit|confident] SOURCE_CREDIBILITY_ANALYZER_VERILINGUA_VERIX_COMPLIANT [ground:self-validation] [conf:0.99] [state:confirmed]