Combine Prs

Arguments

• $ARGUMENTS - Two PR numbers or branch names to compare (e.g., "230 231" or "#230 #231")

If no arguments are provided, ask the user for two PR numbers.

Context

• Current branch: !git branch --show-current
• Git status: !git status --short
• Repo slug: !gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner 2>/dev/null | head -1
• Base ref: !git branch -r 2>/dev/null | grep -oE 'origin/(main|master)' | head -1
• Remotes: !git remote -v 2>/dev/null | head -6

Your task

Compare two PRs that implement the same feature, analyze strengths and weaknesses, present a comparison, and on approval combine the best parts into one branch.

Step 1: Parse arguments and fetch PR metadata

Extract two PR numbers from the arguments (strip any leading "#" characters). If branch names are given instead, find their associated PRs via gh pr list.

For each PR, fetch metadata:

gh pr view <number> --json number,title,body,headRefName,baseRefName,author,state,additions,deletions,changedFiles

Verify both PRs target the same base branch and address the same feature. If they do not appear related, warn the user and ask whether to proceed.

Step 2: Fetch and analyze both diffs

For each PR, get the full diff:

gh pr diff <number>

Also read the actual changed files from each branch to understand full context (not just diff hunks). Check out each branch temporarily or use git show <branch>:<file> to read files without switching.

Analyze each PR across these dimensions:

• Files changed - which files each PR touches
• Lines added/removed - scope of changes
• Package/module placement - where new code lives, architectural fit
• Code liveness - is the code wired in and working, or dead/placeholder code
• Test coverage - what tests exist, what is covered
• Fail-fast vs graceful fallback - error handling approach
• API design - interfaces, contracts, extensibility
• Architectural implications - impact on future work, dependency direction

Step 3: Present comparison table

Present a structured comparison to the user:

## PR Comparison: #<A> vs #<B>

| Dimension | #<A> | #<B> | Verdict |
|-----------|------|------|---------|
| Files changed | ... | ... | ... |
| Lines +/- | ... | ... | ... |
| Package placement | ... | ... | ... |
| Code liveness | ... | ... | ... |
| Test coverage | ... | ... | ... |
| Error handling | ... | ... | ... |
| API design | ... | ... | ... |
| Future implications | ... | ... | ... |

## Recommended Combination Strategy

Take from #<A>:
- ...

Take from #<B>:
- ...

Resulting branch: #<winner> (will be updated, #<loser> will be superseded)

Wait for the user to approve, modify, or reject the strategy before proceeding.

Step 4: Combine onto one branch

After user approval:

1. Determine the surviving PR. Use whichever branch has the better foundation (or whichever the user specified). Check it out.

2. Reset to base. Soft-reset to the merge base so all changes become staged:

git checkout <surviving-branch>
git reset --soft <base-branch>

3. Unstage everything so you can selectively apply the combined result:

git reset HEAD .

4. Apply the combined changes. Read the relevant files from both branches using git show <branch>:<file> and write the combined version that incorporates the best parts of each. This requires judgment — it is not a mechanical merge. For files where both PRs made changes:

   • Read both versions in full
   • Determine which parts to keep from each
   • Write the combined result

5. Stage and commit with a descriptive squashed commit message:

git add <files...>
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<concise summary of the combined feature>

Combined from #<A> and #<B>:
- From #<A>: <what was taken>
- From #<B>: <what was taken>
EOF
)"

6. Force-push with lease to update the surviving PR:

git push --force-with-lease origin <surviving-branch>

Step 5: Update PR descriptions

Update the surviving PR body to note the combination:

gh pr edit <surviving-number> --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
<original or updated description>

---
Supersedes #<other-number>. Combined the best of both implementations:
- From #<other>: <what was taken>
- From this PR: <what was kept>
EOF
)"

Step 6: Handle the superseded PR

Ask the user whether to close the superseded PR. If approved:

gh pr close <other-number> --comment "Superseded by #<surviving-number>, which combines the best parts of both implementations."

If the user declines, leave it open but add a comment noting the relationship:

gh pr comment <other-number> --body "See #<surviving-number> for a combined implementation that incorporates the best of both PRs."

Step 7: Report

Summarize what was done:

## Combined PR Result

- **Surviving PR:** #<number> (<url>)
- **Superseded PR:** #<number> (<status>)
- **Commit:** <short-sha> - <message>
- **From #<A>:** <what was taken>
- **From #<B>:** <what was taken>

Failure Handling