How do I install the Endo Vitd No Testing Over75 skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add dromlakhani/endo-vitd-no-testing-over75 in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Endo Vitd No Testing Over75 safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Endo Vitd No Testing Over75?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Endo Vitd No Testing Over75 free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Endo Vitd No Testing Over75?

dromlakhani (@dromlakhani) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Endo Vitd No Testing Over75 by dromlakhani

Name: Endo Vitd No Testing Over75
Rating: 4.666666666666667 (3 reviews)
Author: dromlakhani

Endo Vitd No Testing Over75

Recommends against routine 25(OH)D testing in adults aged 75 years and older. Triggered by questions such as "Should I order a vitamin D level for this patient over 75?" or "Is vitamin D testing indicated for asymptomatic elderly adults?"

dromlakhani Updated Sep 8, 2026 10 repo stars

File contents

Against routine vitamin D testing in adults over 75

STEP 1 — Gather Information

Collect patient age, presence of symptoms or conditions that constitute established indications for 25(OH)D testing (e.g., hypocalcemia, osteoporosis, history of falls/fractures, malabsorption, chronic kidney disease, or current vitamin D supplementation therapy requiring monitoring).

STEP 2 — Rule In / Rule Out

If patient is <75 years old OR has any established indication for vitamin D testing → consider testing per other guidelines (rule out). If patient is ≥75 years old AND has no established indications for testing → proceed (rule in).

STEP 3 — Classify or Stratify

Classify as "No routine testing indicated" for all patients meeting rule‑in criteria; further stratification by risk factors (obesity, dark complexion, institutionalization) does not change the recommendation against routine screening.

STEP 4 — Decide

Do not order a routine 25(OH)D test; if vitamin D supplementation is desired per guideline recommendation 6, prescribe empiric low‑dose supplementation (e.g., 800–1000 IU daily) without prior testing.

Clinical Guardrails / Mimics / Pitfalls

Do not test solely based on age; do not delay empiric supplementation awaiting test results; do not interpret low 25(OH)D as deficiency in asymptomatic older adults without clinical correlates; avoid testing in patients with hypocalcemia, malabsorption, osteoporosis, or recent fractures—these are indications for testing, not screening.

Concrete Clinical Example

An 80‑year‑old woman with well‑controlled hypertension asks whether she should have a vitamin D level drawn. She reports no bone pain, falls, fractures, malabsorption, or hypocalcemia, and is not currently taking vitamin D. According to the guideline, routine testing is not recommended; instead, empiric vitamin D supplementation of 800–1000 IU daily may be considered if not already supplementing.

Source: Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, Endocrine Society, 2024, DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae290

---name: endo-vitd-no-testing-over75description: Recommends against routine 25(OH)D testing in adults aged 75 years and older. Triggered by questions such as "Should I order a vitamin D level for this patient over 75?" or "Is vitamin D testing indicated for asymptomatic elderly adults?"---# Against routine vitamin D testing in adults over 75## STEP 1 — Gather InformationCollect patient age, presence of symptoms or conditions that constitute established indications for 25(OH)D testing (e.g., hypocalcemia, osteoporosis, history of falls/fractures, malabsorption, chronic kidney disease, or current vitamin D supplementation therapy requiring monitoring).## STEP 2 — Rule In / Rule OutIf patient is <75 years old OR has any established indication for vitamin D testing → consider testing per other guidelines (rule out). If patient is ≥75 years old AND has no established indications for testing → proceed (rule in).## STEP 3 — Classify or StratifyClassify as "No routine testing indicated" for all patients meeting rule‑in criteria; further stratification by risk factors (obesity, dark complexion, institutionalization) does not change the recommendation against routine screening.## STEP 4 — DecideDo not order a routine 25(OH)D test; if vitamin D supplementation is desired per guideline recommendation 6, prescribe empiric low‑dose supplementation (e.g., 800–1000 IU daily) without prior testing.## Clinical Guardrails / Mimics / PitfallsDo not test solely based on age; do not delay empiric supplementation awaiting test results; do not interpret low 25(OH)D as deficiency in asymptomatic older adults without clinical correlates; avoid testing in patients with hypocalcemia, malabsorption, osteoporosis, or recent fractures—these are indications for testing, not screening.## Concrete Clinical ExampleAn 80‑year‑old woman with well‑controlled hypertension asks whether she should have a vitamin D level drawn. She reports no bone pain, falls, fractures, malabsorption, or hypocalcemia, and is not currently taking vitamin D. According to the guideline, routine testing is not recommended; instead, empiric vitamin D supplementation of 800–1000 IU daily may be considered if not already supplementing.**Source:** Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, Endocrine Society, 2024, DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae290

Frequently asked questions