Skill: Research Synthesizer
Metadata
- Name: research-synthesizer
- Version: 1.0
- Purpose: Analyze YouTube research data and identify content opportunities
- Token Budget: Medium (Sonnet recommended)
When to Use This Skill
Invoke when:
- Processing research engine output
- Analyzing competitor videos
- Identifying content gaps
- Creating idea briefs from raw data
Input Data Expected
This skill processes output from the research engine:
{
"idea_id": "seed_001_mod_003",
"seed_idea": "Statin side effects myths",
"modifier": "myth-busting + data",
"youtube_research": {
"top_videos": [...],
"total_views": 2500000,
"avg_views": 250000,
"comment_themes": [...],
"transcript_insights": [...]
}
}
Analysis Framework
1. Demand Analysis
Question: Is there audience interest in this topic?
Signals to check:
- Total views across top 10 videos
- View velocity (views per day since publish)
- Search volume indicators
- Comment volume and engagement
Scoring:
| Signal | Low (1-3) | Medium (4-6) | High (7-10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total views (top 10) | <500K | 500K-2M | >2M |
| Avg views per video | <50K | 50K-200K | >200K |
| Comments per video | <100 | 100-500 | >500 |
2. Gap Analysis
Question: What's missing in existing content?
Gaps to identify:
- Angle gaps: Topics covered but not from this perspective
- Depth gaps: Surface-level only, no deep-dives
- Format gaps: No Hinglish, no Indian context
- Recency gaps: Outdated information, no recent videos
- Authority gaps: No credentialed experts
Gap Detection Process:
- List what existing videos cover
- Identify what they DON'T cover
- Find questions in comments that aren't answered
- Check publish dates (>2 years = recency gap)
- Check creator credentials
3. Competition Assessment
Question: Can we compete/win?
Factors:
- Channel size of top performers
- Production quality required
- Content depth of existing videos
- Engagement rates
Competitive Positioning:
| Their Strength | Our Counter |
|---|---|
| High production | Authenticity + expertise |
| English content | Hinglish accessibility |
| Generic health | Specialist cardiology |
| Western context | Indian-specific |
| Clickbait | Evidence-based trust |
4. Alignment Scoring
Question: How well does this fit our channel?
Check against:
- Content pillars (1-5 score)
- Target archetypes (which ones?)
- Expertise match (can we add value?)
- Hinglish potential (natural or forced?)
Comment Theme Analysis
Process:
- Sample 50-100 comments from top videos
- Categorize by type:
- Questions (what they want to know)
- Objections (what they doubt)
- Stories (what they've experienced)
- Requests (what they want more of)
Theme Template:
## Comment Themes for: [Topic]
### Top Questions (Content Opportunities)
1. [Question theme] - [Frequency: X comments]
2. [Question theme] - [Frequency: X comments]
### Common Objections (Must Address)
1. [Objection] - "But what about..."
2. [Objection] - "This doesn't work because..."
### Personal Stories (Connection Points)
1. [Story pattern] - "My father had..."
2. [Story pattern] - "I experienced..."
### Explicit Requests
1. "[Request]" - X viewers asked for this
Transcript Insight Extraction
What to Extract:
- Key points covered
- Examples/analogies used
- Questions posed to audience
- Calls to action used
- What's missing/weak
Transcript Analysis Template:
## Video: [Title]
**Channel**: [Name] | **Views**: [X] | **Length**: [X min]
### Content Covered:
- Point 1
- Point 2
- Point 3
### Effective Elements:
- Hook used: [describe]
- Best analogy: [quote]
- Engagement technique: [describe]
### Weaknesses/Gaps:
- Missing: [what wasn't covered]
- Weak: [what was poorly explained]
- Outdated: [what needs updating]
### Our Opportunity:
[How we can do this better]
Output: Idea Brief
After analysis, generate an idea brief:
# Idea Brief: [Title]
## Opportunity Score: [X/10]
- Demand: [X/10]
- Gap: [X/10]
- Competition: [X/10]
- Alignment: [X/10]
## The Opportunity
[2-3 sentence summary of why this is worth making]
## Target Audience
**Primary archetype**: [Name]
**Awareness level**: [Level]
**Key pain point addressed**: [Pain point]
## Content Angle
[How we'll approach this differently than existing content]
## Key Points to Cover
1. [Point 1]
2. [Point 2]
3. [Point 3]
## Must Address (from comments)
- [Question/objection 1]
- [Question/objection 2]
## Suggested Hook
[Hook concept based on research]
## Recommended Format
- **Length**: [X minutes]
- **Style**: [Educational/Story/Myth-bust/etc.]
- **Visuals**: [Any specific suggestions]
## Research Sources
- [Source 1]
- [Source 2]
- [Competitor video to reference]
## Priority: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
**Reason**: [Why this priority]
Batch Processing Mode
When processing multiple ideas:
- Quick filter (eliminate obvious low-potential)
- Score remaining (all criteria)
- Rank by total score
- Generate briefs for top 20-30
- Final selection to 100-day calendar
Integration Points
- Input from: Research engine (YouTube API data)
- Output to: Content calendar, Script skill
- Feeds into: Hook generator, Script writer
This skill transforms raw research into actionable content opportunities.