Create Prd

Create PRD

When to Use

• Before starting a new feature — to align engineering, product, and stakeholders on scope
• When a GitHub Issue or Slack request needs formal requirements before implementation
• When writing a PRD from scratch for a feature you're about to build solo
• As a handoff document: from discovery → design → implementation
• When the current conversation already contains enough context to synthesize a first PRD draft

Note: This skill works best for well-scoped, single-feature PRDs. For large epics with many sub-features, use this per sub-feature and link them together.

Before You Write This PRD (Risk Gate)

Before formalizing requirements, briefly verify that the feature is worth building. Skip this gate only when the build decision is already validated (e.g., a committed roadmap item, a contractual requirement, or a P0 bug fix).

Feature Demand Level Check

Proceed to a full PRD for Level 3 or Level 4. For Level 0–2, start with the smallest validation step (a buyer conversation, a landing page, a manual pilot) and feed the findings into the PRD's Problem Statement and JTBD sections instead of skipping straight to requirements.

Minimum Risk Check (for Level 1–2)

Answer these before writing requirements:

• Demand: Is there evidence a specific user urgently needs this?
• Switching reason: What makes the current alternative insufficient?
• Distribution: Is there a repeatable way to reach the target user after launch?
• Retention: Is there a reason users would return after the first use?

If any answer is "unknown", record it in the PRD's Open Questions section and tag it needs-validation-before-implementation rather than silently assuming a "yes".

Prerequisites

• A feature idea, GitHub Issue, or user request to formalize
• Access to any existing context: user research, analytics, prior PRDs, or CLAUDE.md/copilot-instructions.md

Workflow

1. Gather Context

If the current conversation, issue, or spec thread already contains enough information, draft from that context first. Do not restart discovery from zero unless the missing gaps would materially change scope.

Before writing, collect:

# What does the product currently do?
Get-Content README.md | Select-Object -First 40
if (Test-Path .github/copilot-instructions.md) {
    Get-Content .github/copilot-instructions.md | Select-Object -First 50
}

# Any existing product docs?
Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Include "*.md" | Where-Object { $_.Name -match 'product|spec|prd|requirements' }

# Related GitHub issues
# Tool: github-mcp-server-search_issues
#   query: "feature-keyword in:title is:open"
#   owner: "my-org"
#   repo: "my-app"

2. Define the Job-to-be-Done (JTBD)

Before writing requirements, anchor in the user's actual goal:

When [situation/trigger],
I want to [motivation],
So that I can [expected outcome].

Example:

When I've finished coding a feature and want to commit, I want to automatically format my commit message to follow conventions, So that I can maintain a clean, readable git history without remembering the format.

3. Write the PRD

Use this template:

# PRD: [Feature Name]

## Overview
One paragraph: what this feature does and why it matters.

## Problem Statement
What user pain point or business opportunity does this address?
Include data or quotes if available.

## Jobs-to-be-Done
**Primary JTBD:**
> When [situation], I want to [motivation], so that [outcome].

**Secondary JTBDs (optional):**
- ...

## Goals & Success Metrics
| Goal | Metric | Target |
|------|--------|--------|
| Reduce time to commit | Time from ready-to-commit to pushed | < 30 seconds |
| Adoption | % of commits using conventional format | > 80% after 30 days |

## Non-Goals (Out of Scope)
- Explicit list of what this does NOT include
- Helps prevent scope creep

## User Stories
### Must Have (P0)
- As a [user], I can [action] so that [benefit]
- As a [user], I can [action] so that [benefit]

### Should Have (P1)
- As a [user], I can [action] so that [benefit]

### Nice to Have (P2)
- As a [user], I can [action] so that [benefit]

## Functional Requirements
### Core Behavior
1. [Requirement] — [Acceptance criterion]
2. [Requirement] — [Acceptance criterion]

### Edge Cases
- [Edge case] → [Expected behavior]
- [Edge case] → [Expected behavior]

## Technical Constraints
- Platform: [e.g., Windows + macOS + Linux]
- Existing systems to integrate with: [e.g., GitHub MCP, git CLI]
- Performance: [e.g., < 2s response time]

## Open Questions
- [ ] [Question that needs decision before implementation]
- [ ] [Question that needs design input]

## Appendix
- Related issues: #123, #456
- Inspired by: [prior art, competitor feature, user research]

4. Save and Link

# Save to docs directory or alongside issue
$featureName = "commit-workflow"
$prdPath = "docs/prd-$featureName.md"
# (Write the PRD content to file)

# Link from GitHub Issue (via comment or issue body update)
# gh issue comment 123 --body "PRD: docs/prd-$featureName.md"

If your workflow uses GitHub Issues as the system of record, link the PRD from the issue or publish the summary there so implementation and triage can find it later.

Examples

Minimal PRD (Solo Developer)

For a solo project, a PRD can be much lighter:

# PRD: Commit Workflow Skill

## What & Why
Add a skill that guides conventional commit message creation with emoji.
Developers lose time formatting commits manually; this automates the pattern.

## JTBD
When I'm ready to commit, I want auto-formatted conventional commit messages,
so that my git history is readable without manual effort.

## Must Have
- Emoji + type + scope + description format
- Atomic commit splitting guidance
- PowerShell code blocks for Windows compat

## Non-Goals
- Automatic commit (user still types `git commit -m`)
- Integration with GUI git clients

PRD from GitHub Issue

Issue #145: "Users can't tell which commits are breaking changes"

JTBD: When I'm reviewing git log, I want breaking changes visually distinct,
so that I can identify risky commits without reading every message.

Requirements:
- 💥 emoji + `!` suffix for breaking changes
- BREAKING CHANGE footer in body
- CI lint rule for enforcement

Tips

• Start with JTBD, not features: features are solutions; jobs are the problems worth solving
• Synthesize before interviewing again: if the conversation already answers the key questions, produce the first draft and ask only targeted follow-ups for true unknowns
• Non-goals are as important as goals: they prevent scope creep during implementation
• Acceptance criteria are testable: "users can X" is not; "clicking Save triggers validation and shows error within 200ms" is
• PRD ≠ design spec: leave implementation details out; focus on what, not how
• Link your PRD to the GitHub Issue: keeps traceability from discovery → delivery

See Also

• github-issue-triage — understand the issue backlog first
• fix-github-issue — execute after PRD is approved
• Inspired by: awesome-claude-code/resources/slash-commands/create-prd