Quick Summary
Goal: Build structured course material with learning objectives, modules, lessons, exercises, and assessments.
Workflow:
- Define scope — Target audience, prerequisites, duration, objectives
- Map objectives — Align to Bloom's taxonomy
- Structure curriculum — Modules → Lessons → Exercises → Assessments
- Develop content — Per lesson: concept, explanation, examples, exercises
- Create assessments — Knowledge checks + final assessment
- Review pedagogy — Progressive difficulty, prerequisite chains
Key Rules:
- Every objective mapped to Bloom's taxonomy level
- Progressive complexity (each module builds on previous)
- Use enforced template from
.claude/templates/course-outline-template.md
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Course Builder
Bloom's Taxonomy Reference
| Level |
Verb Examples |
Assessment Type |
| Remember |
Define, list, recall, identify |
Multiple choice, fill-in-blank |
| Understand |
Explain, describe, summarize, interpret |
Short answer, paraphrase |
| Apply |
Use, implement, solve, demonstrate |
Problem sets, exercises |
| Analyze |
Compare, contrast, examine, differentiate |
Case studies, analysis papers |
| Evaluate |
Judge, critique, assess, justify |
Debates, reviews, peer assessment |
| Create |
Design, construct, produce, develop |
Projects, portfolios, presentations |
Step 1: Define Learning Scope
Gather from user or research:
- Target audience — Who? What's their background?
- Prerequisites — What must they know already?
- Duration — Total hours/weeks available
- Desired outcomes — What can they DO after the course?
Step 2: Map Objectives to Bloom's
For each desired outcome, assign a Bloom's level:
- Start with lower levels (Remember, Understand)
- Progress to higher levels (Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create)
- Ensure at least one objective at Apply level or above
Step 3: Structure Curriculum
Organize into modules (3-8 per course):
- Each module has 2-5 lessons
- Each module has its own learning objectives
- Modules build on each other (prerequisite chain)
Step 4: Develop Lesson Content
For each lesson, provide:
- Duration — Estimated time
- Concept — Core idea in 1-2 sentences
- Explanation — Theory, context, why it matters
- Examples — 2-3 real-world illustrations
- Exercise — Hands-on practice activity
- Assessment — How to verify learning
Step 5: Create Assessments
Per module:
- Knowledge check — 3-5 questions covering key concepts
- Questions aligned to module's Bloom's level
Final:
- Comprehensive assessment — Covers all modules
- Mix of Bloom's levels — At least 1 question per level taught
Output
Write to docs/knowledge/courses/{descriptive-slug}.md using enforced template from .claude/templates/course-outline-template.md.
[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Re-read files after context changes. Context compaction, resume, or long-running work can make memory stale; verify current files before acting.
Verify generated content against source evidence. AI hallucinates APIs, names, claims, and document facts. Check the relevant source before documenting or referencing.
Check downstream references before deleting or renaming. Removing an artifact can stale docs, generated mirrors, configs, and callers; map references first.
Trace the full impact chain after edits. Changing a definition can miss derived outputs and consumers. Follow the affected chain before declaring done.
Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. One green check is not all green checks; validate every output surface the change can affect.
Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing OR flagging one as a defect. Before changing or reporting a constant, limit, flag, cutoff, wording, or pattern, read nearby context and history, the CALLER's ordering, and 2+ sibling call sites of the same convention. A doc stating WHAT without WHY is missing rationale, not proof of a missing guard.
Surface ambiguity before acting — don't pick silently. Multiple valid interpretations require an explicit question or stated assumption with risk.
Assert the outcome your system owns, not the intermediate state your infrastructure owns. When verifying async work, assert the final business state — never the delivery/retry bookkeeping held in shared infrastructure that any co-running process can write. Such a check passes when run alone and flakes the moment anything else shares that infrastructure.
Keep shared guidance role-relevant. Universal guidance must help every receiving skill or agent; code-specific obligations belong only in code-specific protocols.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act.
Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical + sequential thinking — every claim needs appropriate traced evidence (file:line for repo/code claims; source URL or artifact section for research, product, content, and docs claims); confidence >80% to act, <60% DO NOT recommend. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact, admit uncertainty freely, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references before deleting or renaming, verify all affected outputs, re-read files after context loss, and surface ambiguity before acting.
Project Protocol Overlay — Before executing this skill, resolve any PROJECT overlay rules layered onto it: match this skill's name against the Target column of the project's skill-protocol index (docs/project-reference/skill-protocols-reference.md by default; a referenceDocs entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path), taking the most specific matching tier ONLY — exact name > glob > *. That precedence orders overlays against EACH OTHER, never against this skill. Read ONLY the matched bodies, resolved as <protocols-dir>/<Name>.md; a row's Body link is display text, never a read path. A matched body that is missing or malformed is REPORTED and skipped — never reconstructed from the index Description. No index, or no match -> proceed with no overlay, silently. Full contract: .claude/skills/project-skill-protocol/references/registry.md.
Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY: they ADD rules on top of this skill's own protocol and NEVER replace, override, disable, or reinterpret a rule it already states — removing every overlay must return this skill to exactly its documented behavior. An overlay is a BRIEF, not an authority escalation: it can NEVER waive a workflow gate, git discipline, a review gate, or a user-confirmation gate. A genuine overlay-vs-skill conflict, or two equally-specific overlays that directly contradict -> surface both to the user; NEVER resolve silently.
MUST ATTENTION resolve project protocol overlays for this skill BEFORE executing — most specific matching tier only (exact > glob > *, which ranks overlays against each other, NEVER against this skill), read only matched bodies at <protocols-dir>/<Name>.md; a missing or malformed body is reported, never reconstructed. Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY (they never replace this skill's own rules) and are a brief, NEVER an authority escalation; an equal-specificity contradiction goes to the user.
Closing Reminders
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal: Build structured course material with learning objectives, modules, lessons, exercises, and assessments.
Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):
AI Mistake Prevention: verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references, verify all affected outputs, re-read after context loss, surface ambiguity.
Critical Thinking: MUST ATTENTION critical + sequential thinking, traced proof, confidence >80% to act, never guess as fact.
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.
1---2name: course-builder-33description: [Content] Use when you need to build structured learning/teaching course material with Bloom taxonomy objectives, modules, lessons, exercises, and assessments.4---56## Quick Summary78**Goal:** Build structured course material with learning objectives, modules, lessons, exercises, and assessments.910**Workflow:**11121. **Define scope** — Target audience, prerequisites, duration, objectives132. **Map objectives** — Align to Bloom's taxonomy143. **Structure curriculum** — Modules → Lessons → Exercises → Assessments154. **Develop content** — Per lesson: concept, explanation, examples, exercises165. **Create assessments** — Knowledge checks + final assessment176. **Review pedagogy** — Progressive difficulty, prerequisite chains1819**Key Rules:**2021- Every objective mapped to Bloom's taxonomy level22- Progressive complexity (each module builds on previous)23- Use enforced template from `.claude/templates/course-outline-template.md`2425**Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).**2627# Course Builder2829## Bloom's Taxonomy Reference3031| Level | Verb Examples | Assessment Type |32| -------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |33| **Remember** | Define, list, recall, identify | Multiple choice, fill-in-blank |34| **Understand** | Explain, describe, summarize, interpret | Short answer, paraphrase |35| **Apply** | Use, implement, solve, demonstrate | Problem sets, exercises |36| **Analyze** | Compare, contrast, examine, differentiate | Case studies, analysis papers |37| **Evaluate** | Judge, critique, assess, justify | Debates, reviews, peer assessment |38| **Create** | Design, construct, produce, develop | Projects, portfolios, presentations |3940## Step 1: Define Learning Scope4142Gather from user or research:4344- **Target audience** — Who? What's their background?45- **Prerequisites** — What must they know already?46- **Duration** — Total hours/weeks available47- **Desired outcomes** — What can they DO after the course?4849## Step 2: Map Objectives to Bloom's5051For each desired outcome, assign a Bloom's level:5253- Start with lower levels (Remember, Understand)54- Progress to higher levels (Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create)55- Ensure at least one objective at Apply level or above5657## Step 3: Structure Curriculum5859Organize into modules (3-8 per course):6061- Each module has 2-5 lessons62- Each module has its own learning objectives63- Modules build on each other (prerequisite chain)6465## Step 4: Develop Lesson Content6667For each lesson, provide:68691. **Duration** — Estimated time702. **Concept** — Core idea in 1-2 sentences713. **Explanation** — Theory, context, why it matters724. **Examples** — 2-3 real-world illustrations735. **Exercise** — Hands-on practice activity746. **Assessment** — How to verify learning7576## Step 5: Create Assessments7778Per module:7980- **Knowledge check** — 3-5 questions covering key concepts81- Questions aligned to module's Bloom's level8283Final:8485- **Comprehensive assessment** — Covers all modules86- **Mix of Bloom's levels** — At least 1 question per level taught8788## Output8990Write to `docs/knowledge/courses/{descriptive-slug}.md` using enforced template from `.claude/templates/course-outline-template.md`.9192---9394> **[IMPORTANT]** Use `TaskCreate` to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.9596<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->9798> **AI Mistake Prevention** — Failure modes to avoid on every task:99>100> **Re-read files after context changes.** Context compaction, resume, or long-running work can make memory stale; verify current files before acting.101> **Verify generated content against source evidence.** AI hallucinates APIs, names, claims, and document facts. Check the relevant source before documenting or referencing.102> **Check downstream references before deleting or renaming.** Removing an artifact can stale docs, generated mirrors, configs, and callers; map references first.103> **Trace the full impact chain after edits.** Changing a definition can miss derived outputs and consumers. Follow the affected chain before declaring done.104> **Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first.** One green check is not all green checks; validate every output surface the change can affect.105> **Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing OR flagging one as a defect.** Before changing or reporting a constant, limit, flag, cutoff, wording, or pattern, read nearby context and history, the CALLER's ordering, and 2+ sibling call sites of the same convention. A doc stating WHAT without WHY is missing rationale, not proof of a missing guard.106> **Surface ambiguity before acting — don't pick silently.** Multiple valid interpretations require an explicit question or stated assumption with risk.107> **Assert the outcome your system owns, not the intermediate state your infrastructure owns.** When verifying async work, assert the final business state — never the delivery/retry bookkeeping held in shared infrastructure that any co-running process can write. Such a check passes when run alone and flakes the moment anything else shares that infrastructure.108> **Keep shared guidance role-relevant.** Universal guidance must help every receiving skill or agent; code-specific obligations belong only in code-specific protocols.109110<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->111112<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->113114> **Critical Thinking Mindset** — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act.115> **Anti-hallucination:** Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.116117<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->118119<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->120121**MUST ATTENTION** apply critical + sequential thinking — every claim needs appropriate traced evidence (`file:line` for repo/code claims; source URL or artifact section for research, product, content, and docs claims); confidence >80% to act, <60% DO NOT recommend. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact, admit uncertainty freely, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence.122123<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->124125<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->126127**MUST ATTENTION** apply AI mistake prevention — verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references before deleting or renaming, verify all affected outputs, re-read files after context loss, and surface ambiguity before acting.128129<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->130131<!-- SYNC:project-protocol-overlay -->132133> **Project Protocol Overlay** — Before executing this skill, resolve any PROJECT overlay rules layered onto it: match this skill's name against the `Target` column of the project's skill-protocol index (`docs/project-reference/skill-protocols-reference.md` by default; a `referenceDocs` entry in `docs/project-config.json` overrides the path), taking the most specific matching tier ONLY — exact name > glob > `*`. **That precedence orders overlays against EACH OTHER, never against this skill.** Read ONLY the matched bodies, resolved as `<protocols-dir>/<Name>.md`; a row's Body link is display text, never a read path. A matched body that is missing or malformed is REPORTED and skipped — never reconstructed from the index Description. No index, or no match -> proceed with no overlay, silently. Full contract: `.claude/skills/project-skill-protocol/references/registry.md`.134>135> Overlays are **ADDITIVE ONLY**: they ADD rules on top of this skill's own protocol and NEVER replace, override, disable, or reinterpret a rule it already states — removing every overlay must return this skill to exactly its documented behavior. An overlay is a BRIEF, not an authority escalation: it can NEVER waive a workflow gate, git discipline, a review gate, or a user-confirmation gate. A genuine overlay-vs-skill conflict, or two equally-specific overlays that directly contradict -> surface both to the user; NEVER resolve silently.136137<!-- /SYNC:project-protocol-overlay -->138139<!-- SYNC:project-protocol-overlay:reminder -->140141**MUST ATTENTION** resolve project protocol overlays for this skill BEFORE executing — most specific matching tier only (exact > glob > `*`, which ranks overlays against each other, NEVER against this skill), read only matched bodies at `<protocols-dir>/<Name>.md`; a missing or malformed body is reported, never reconstructed. Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY (they never replace this skill's own rules) and are a brief, NEVER an authority escalation; an equal-specificity contradiction goes to the user.142143<!-- /SYNC:project-protocol-overlay:reminder -->144145## Closing Reminders146147**IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal:** Build structured course material with learning objectives, modules, lessons, exercises, and assessments.148149**Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):**150151- **AI Mistake Prevention:** verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references, verify all affected outputs, re-read after context loss, surface ambiguity.152- **Critical Thinking:** MUST ATTENTION critical + sequential thinking, traced proof, confidence >80% to act, never guess as fact.153154- **MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION** break work into small todo tasks using `TaskCreate` BEFORE starting155- **MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION** search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code156- **MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION** cite `file:line` evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)157- **MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION** add a final review todo task to verify work quality158159**[TASK-PLANNING]** Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.