Coding Lead

Coding Lead

This skill supersedes inline coding rules in agent SOUL.md files.

Route by complexity. ACP fails → auto-fallback to direct execution.

Task Classification

When in doubt, go one level up.

Tech Stack (New Projects)

Existing projects: follow current stack. New: propose first, wait for confirmation.

Tool Detection & Fallback

All tools are optional. Detect once per session:

Notation: [memory] [qmd] [acp] = use if available, fallback if not.

ACP Agent Routing

ACP access: sessions_spawn(runtime="acp") may not be available (platform limitation). Use acpx CLI as the reliable path:

# One-shot execution via acpx (works from any session type)
cmd /c "C:\Users\beyou\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules\openclaw\extensions\acpx\node_modules\.bin\acpx.cmd --verbose --agent \"node C:/Users/beyou/AppData/Roaming/npm/node_modules/@zed-industries/claude-agent-acp/dist/index.js\" exec \"<your prompt>\" 2>&1"

If sessions_spawn(runtime="acp") is available in your session, use it. Otherwise fall back to acpx CLI via exec.

Check acp.allowedAgents in openclaw.json for available agents:

How to route

# Default (uses acp.defaultAgent, typically "claude"):
sessions_spawn(runtime: "acp", task: <prompt>, cwd: <dir>)

# Explicit agent:
sessions_spawn(runtime: "acp", agentId: "claude", task: <prompt>, cwd: <dir>)
sessions_spawn(runtime: "acp", agentId: "codex", task: <prompt>, cwd: <dir>)

Fallback chain

1. Try preferred agent → 2. Try alternate agent → 3. Direct execution

If one agent fails/unavailable, try the other before falling back to direct execution.

Parallel with different agents

For complex tasks with independent sub-tasks (max 2 parallel):

Session 1: claude → backend refactor (needs deep reasoning)
Session 2: codex → frontend fixes (needs fast iteration)

Coding Standards — Two Layers, No Overlap

Layer 1: Project-level (Claude Code owns)

Projects may have their own CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, docs/ — these are Claude Code's responsibility. It reads them automatically. Do NOT paste project-level rules into ACP prompts.

Layer 2: Team-level (OpenClaw owns)

shared/knowledge/tech-standards.md — cross-project standards (security, change control, tech stack preferences). Only relevant for direct execution (simple tasks without ACP).

When spawning ACP

• Don't embed coding standards in the prompt — Claude Code has its own CLAUDE.md
• Do include: task description, acceptance criteria, relevant context (file paths, decisions)
• Do include task-specific constraints if any (e.g., "don't change the API contract")

When executing directly (no ACP)

Load standards once per session, first match wins:

1. shared/knowledge/tech-standards.md (team-level, if exists)
2. Built-in defaults (below, if nothing exists)

Built-in Defaults (fallback for direct execution)

• KISS + SOLID + DRY, research before modifying
• Methods <200 lines, follow existing architecture
• No hardcoded secrets, minimal change scope, clear commits
• DB changes via SQL scripts, new tech requires confirmation

Simple Tasks

1. Read target file(s) (standards already loaded per above)
2. [memory] Recall related decisions
3. Execute with read/write/edit/exec
4. [memory] Record what changed and why

Medium/Complex Tasks

Step 1: Build Context File

Write to <project>/.openclaw/context-<task-id>.md (ACP reads from disk, not from prompt):

# [qmd] or grep: find relevant code
# [memory] recall + lessons: find past decisions
# Standards already loaded (see "Coding Standards Loading" above)
# Write context file with 3-5 key rules from loaded standards — do NOT paste full file

Minimal context file structure:

# Task Context: <id>
## Project — path, stack, architecture style
## Relevant Code — file paths + brief descriptions from qmd/grep
## History — past decisions/lessons from memory (if any)
## Constraints — task-specific rules only (NOT general coding standards — Claude Code has CLAUDE.md)

Full template with examples → see references/prompt-templates.md

Step 2: Lean Prompt

Project: <path> | Stack: <e.g. Laravel 10 + React 18 + TS>
Context file: .openclaw/context-<task-id>.md (read it first if it exists)

## Task
<description>

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] <criteria>
- [ ] Tests pass, no unrelated changes, clean code

Before finishing: run linter + tests, include results.
When done: openclaw system event --text "Done: <summary>" --mode now

Step 3: Spawn

# Option A: sessions_spawn (if available in your session)
sessions_spawn(runtime: "acp", task: <prompt>, cwd: <project-dir>, mode: "run")

# Option B: acpx CLI (always works)
exec: acpx --agent "node C:/Users/beyou/AppData/Roaming/npm/node_modules/@zed-industries/claude-agent-acp/dist/index.js" exec "<prompt>"
# Set cwd to project dir in exec command

Step 4: Fallback Detection

Fallback: [memory] log failure → agent executes directly → report to user.

Never silently fail. Always complete or report why not.

Step 5: Verify & Record

1. Check acceptance criteria + run tests
2. [memory] Record: what changed, decisions, lessons
3. Clean up context file

Complex Tasks

Read references/complex-tasks.md only for Complex-level tasks — roles, QA isolation, parallel strategies, RESEARCH→PLAN→EXECUTE→REVIEW flow.

Context Reuse (Token Savings)

• Context file on disk instead of prompt embedding → ~90% token savings per spawn
• Parallel: one context file, multiple ACP sessions read it
• Serial: use mode: "session" + sessions_send for follow-ups
• [qmd]: precision search → only relevant snippets in context file
• No standards in ACP prompts: Claude Code reads its own CLAUDE.md/.cursorrules — don't duplicate
• ACP prompt stays lean: task + acceptance criteria + context file path. No generic rules
• Direct execution: load team standards once per session, not per task

Memory Integration

[memory] Before: recall related work + lessons for context file. [memory] After: record what changed, decisions made, lessons learned. Cross-session: agent remembers across sessions; Claude Code doesn't. This is the core advantage.

Multi-Project Parallel

• Each project gets its own context file in its own .openclaw/ dir
• Spawn with different cwd per project — zero cross-contamination
• Tag memory entries per project: --tags code,<project-name>
• Max 2 parallel ACP sessions — keep token/resource use predictable
• ACP runs in background while agent works on simple tasks directly

See references/prompt-templates.md for multi-project examples.

Smart Retry (max 3)

1. Analyze failure → 2. Adjust prompt → 3. Retry improved → 4. Max 3 then fallback/report. Each retry must be meaningfully different.

Progress Updates

Start → 1 short message. Error → immediate report. Completion → summary. Fallback → explain.

Safety

• Never spawn in ~/.openclaw/ — coding agents may damage config
• Always set cwd to project directory
• Review before commit — especially complex tasks
• Kill runaway sessions — timeout or nonsensical output

See Also

• references/complex-tasks.md — roles, QA, parallel (Complex only)
• references/prompt-templates.md — context file template, prompt examples