DY Marketing
Persuasion that works, drawn from the operators and copywriters whose results are independently verifiable — not the loudest names. Every framework here survived an adversarial credibility-and-accuracy audit. Use them as procedures, not inspiration.
Prime directive: You cannot create desire — you can only channel desire that already exists onto this product (Schwartz). Marketing therefore starts with the prospect's existing wants, words, and beliefs — never with the product. Find the dominant desire already in the market; aim it at what you sell.
The operating procedure
Work in this order. Skipping diagnosis is the #1 reason copy "sounds fine" and converts nothing.
- Research first (before any writing) — Study the product and the prospect more than you write. Surface the single dominant desire, the exact language they use, what they've already tried, what they believe, and the objection they'll raise. (Ogilvy spent three weeks with the Rolls-Royce engineers before one word.) → tools in references/copy.md.
- Diagnose the market — Pin two independent axes: Awareness (Unaware → Most-Aware) and Sophistication (how worn-out the market is from hearing the claim). Together they decide what kind of copy to write before you write it. → references/copy.md (Diagnose).
- Position — Choose the frame: the competitive alternative, your one ownable differentiated claim, and the market category that sets the buyer's yardstick. → references/positioning.md.
- Build the offer — Make the thing worth far more than its price (Value Equation), de-risk it (guarantee), enhance it (scarcity/urgency/bonuses), and name it. A great offer beats great copy. → references/offers.md.
- Plan the content — Decide what the page says before how it says it: harvest the customer's own words, ladder every claim from attribute to the value it serves, generate angles systematically, then choose blocks by the objection each retires. → references/content.md.
- Write — Pick the structure that matches the awareness stage; lead with the headline (5× as many read it as the body); open the conversation already running in their mind; prove every claim with specifics; layer in persuasion primitives; make it slippery (every line earns the next); before sending, run the primal-brain packaging checklist (six stimuli — personal, contrast, tangible, beginning/end, visual, emotion). → references/copy.md + references/persuasion.md. Optional finishing pass: once the copy is clear and converting, elevate only the parts where resonance matters — the headline, a manifesto, the brand line, the emotional peak — with the
eloquenceskill. Never the spec list, guarantee, or CTA mechanics; ornament there lowers response. - Distribute — Win the third-party authorities the crowd already trusts before shouting at the crowd — endorsement flows downhill (Bernays); put it in front of a starving crowd via the Core Four channels; engineer it to spread (STEPPS); remove resistance (REDUCE); follow up 6+ times. → references/distribution.md + references/persuasion.md (Engineering Consent).
- Test & measure — Two versions, keyed/tracked response, scale the winner. Opinions lose to split tests (Hopkins/Caples).
The laws (override any tactic)
- Channel existing desire; don't manufacture it. Enter the conversation already happening in their head (Collier).
- Specificity beats superlatives. "Softens the beard in one minute" beats "amazing." Exact numbers, named proof, concrete nouns (Hopkins, Berger).
- Proof before promises. Trust and belief are the toll gates every persuasion passes through; lead with proof when the market is skeptical (Bencivenga).
- One reader, one big idea. Write to a single person and carry one dominant emotion/idea per piece.
- Clarity beats cleverness. Confused people don't buy. Plain, grade-school language.
- Match the message to the stage. A price headline for an Unaware market converts zero; a story lead for a Most-Aware buyer wastes them (Schwartz).
- Honesty is the long game. Never fake proof or independence — it's the difference between a 40-year career and an FTC order (the Sugarman cautionary tale). Substance first; truthful, attractive, then famous — in that causal order.
When to read what
| The task | Open |
|---|---|
| Headlines, ads, emails, sales/landing pages, VSLs, any copy | references/copy.md |
| What a page should say — content strategy, page blocks, generating angles, "who this is NOT for" | references/content.md |
| Live/synchronous selling — demos, webinars, sales calls, livestreams | references/copy.md (The Live-Commerce Close) |
| Create / price / name / de-risk an offer; bundles; lead magnets | references/offers.md |
| Position, differentiate, or message a product or category | references/positioning.md |
| Content strategy, channels, virality, lead gen, follow-up | references/distribution.md |
| Persuasion principles to layer into anything above; final message-packaging checklist (primal-brain stimuli) | references/persuasion.md |
| Elevate the resonant parts — manifesto, brand line, emotional peak | the eloquence skill (optional finishing pass, after copy converts) |
| Who to trust, who to discount, and why | EXPERTS.md |
Stance on sources
Built on the verified canon. Famous frameworks that did not survive the audit are kept as tools, not authorities: StoryBrand's SB7 is a fine homepage wireframe but yields samey messaging; Godin is strategy, not execution; the "22 Immutable Laws" are hypotheses, not laws. Ignore unverified guru revenue claims — trust acquisitions, third-party records, peer-reviewed studies, and campaign longevity. Details in EXPERTS.md.