Case Forensics

Case Forensics

Navigation: Skill index

Overview

Convert the unstructured discussion into a reproducible instruction-level case.

Skill is responsible for the thread -> evidence map -> method extraction -> reproducibility report phase.

Workflow

1) Parse Timeline

Restore the chronology:

• who acted,
• What decisions were made,
• What changes have been made,
• That was the result.

2) Build Evidence Map

Mark each thesis:

• EVIDENCE – Confirmed by message/artifact
• ASSUMPTION – conclusion without direct proof
• GAP - critically lacking data

3) Extract Method

Collect the method in consecutive steps:

• entry
• action
• toolkits
• quality control
• completion

4) Quantify Outcome

Record:

• before/after metrics
• Type of effect (time/money/quality/risk)
• failed

5) Reproducibility Score

Evaluate the reproducibility of the contract case-data-contract:

• input_completeness
• method_specificity
• artifact_availability
• metric_verifiability

6) Prepare Final Case

Give me:

• case-case
• How to Repeat in 120 Minutes
• GAP block + questions to clarify from gap-interview-questions

Output

Return the sections:

1. Context and purpose
2. Baseline conditions
3. Method(s)
4. Materials/industry/tools
5. Outcome and metrics
6. That didn't work.
7. Replication in 120 minutes
8. Limits of portability
9. GAP and issues

Quality Gates

• No steps without entry/exit.
• Every numerical metric has a source in a thread.
• Any hypothesis without confirmation is labeled ASSUMPTION.
• There are obvious limitations to the applicability of the case.

Anti-Patterns

• Do not give out a “success story” as a methodology.
• Do not hide failures/limitations.
• Do not replace GAP with guesswork.

References

• case-data-contract
• gap-interview-questions