Context Intake From Dispatcher
Receive and restate:
- Situation
- Stage
- Time pressure
- Matched module (
B1 S1 or B1 S2)
- Confidence and routing reason
Before starting any coaching steps, update blueprint/Blueprint-YYYY-MM-DD.md:
- Fill
**Module:** with the matched B1 module name.
- Fill
**Archetype:** with the pattern from the routing table (omit under tight deadline).
- Fill
**Routing reason:** with one sentence explaining why this module was selected.
- Fill
**Signal confidence:** with High / Medium / Low.
- Fill
**Time pressure:** with the user's stated constraint.
- Fill
## 1. Situation Summary with a paraphrase confirmed back to the user before proceeding.
SOP Reference Files
Before coaching, load the relevant reference file:
- B1 S1 (interviews, stakeholder targeting): read
references/b1s1-interviews.md
- B1 S2 (data analysis, robustness): read
references/b1s2-data-analysis.md
These files contain exact SOP techniques (5-filter stakeholder targeting, resistance handling, ghost charting template method, 80/20 assumption audit, definition drill, market research critique formula). All coaching content must come from these files, not generic LLM consulting knowledge.
B1 S1: Data Collection, Interviews, and Expert Engagement
Core method
- Start with stakeholder targeting by org map, not functional guesswork.
- Select interviewees by information ownership, bias counterweight, level altitude, buy-in value, and execution credibility.
- Under resistance, pivot from extraction to trust + access path.
- Use open questions first, then clarifying and probing questions.
- Handle talkative experts with precision prompts, paraphrase loops, and ghost-chart templates.
- Structure sessions as intro -> core -> close -> same-day documentation.
B1 S1 coaching checklist
- Build stakeholder map and targeting rationale.
- Define interview objective and success signal.
- Prepare resistance handling script.
- Use clarifying/probing sequence to force useful numbers.
- Co-create ghost chart when output ambiguity appears.
- Confirm next steps and document immediately.
B1 S2: Analyze Data to Draw Robust Conclusions
Core method
- Validate external numbers: source, incentives, assumptions, recency, scope.
- Run definition drill before any comparison.
- Critique market research design: sample frame, comparability, attribute coverage, importance weighting.
- Apply 80/20: test high-impact assumptions first.
- Triangulate top-down and bottom-up where possible.
- Synthesize many datapoints into 2-3 executable conclusions with clear implications.
B1 S2 coaching checklist
- List critical assumptions and rank by impact.
- Validate high-risk third-party numbers.
- Align metric definitions across sources.
- Audit sample quality and attribute relevance.
- Convert key gaps into dollar impact.
- Produce concise synthesis with next decision implications.
Pattern-Adaptive Delivery
Match delivery style to routed archetype.
Diagnostic Tree mode
- Use branching tests for data credibility and root-cause uncertainty.
- Prioritize disconfirming checks first.
Linear Process mode
- Give ordered workflow from data intake to synthesis output.
- Define artifact at each step.
Heuristic mode
- Use practical rules for interview dynamics, evidence quality, and skepticism control.
Adaptive Depth by Time Pressure
tight deadline: give full checklist immediately and run minimum viable validation.
moderate timeline: execute one step at a time with frequent quality checks.
exploratory: teach full rationale, alternatives, and anti-patterns.
Pattern Trigger
If user says explain pattern or why this approach?, state:
- Active archetype
- Why it best fits the current data/interview signal
- Why alternative patterns are less efficient now
Report Mode: Data/Analysis Report Blueprint
Use when dispatcher flags deliverable-building behavior.
Stage 0: Skeleton
Create section skeleton:
- Objective and key questions
- Data sources and definitions
- Methodology and validation checks
- Findings and synthesis
- Risks, limitations, and confidence
- Decision implications and next tests
Stage 1: Section blueprint
For requested section, provide:
- Required argument chain
- Evidence checklist
- Common logic failures to avoid
Stage 2: Quality gate
Pass only if:
- Definitions are explicit and consistent
- Source credibility is defensible
- Findings are prioritized by impact
- Conclusion is actionable and not a data dump
Consulting Blueprint Section Mapping (B1)
Always keep all 8 sections.
1. Situation Summary: core data/interview challenge, stakeholders, decision context.
2. Framework / Approach Selected: B1 S1 or B1 S2 plus pattern.
3. Decision Logic: why this analysis path, confidence, key assumptions.
4. Step-by-Step Playbook: interview/data-validation/synthesis sequence.
5. Evidence Required: source checks, definitions, sample validity, triangulation needs.
6. Quality Gates: credibility tests, consistency checks, synthesis standards.
7. Missing Gaps: unresolved data, blocked access, uncertain assumptions.
8. Next Action: next interview, data pull, validation test, or synthesis draft.
1---2name: consulting-data-insights3description: Internal consulting sub-skill for data collection, expert interviews, and analysis coaching (B1 modules). Activated by consulting-playbook dispatcher when B1 signals detected - dodging stakeholders, conflicting data sources, synthesis gaps. Do not invoke directly; use consulting-playbook as entry point.4---56# Context Intake From Dispatcher7Receive and restate:8- Situation9- Stage10- Time pressure11- Matched module (`B1 S1` or `B1 S2`)12- Confidence and routing reason1314Before starting any coaching steps, update `blueprint/Blueprint-YYYY-MM-DD.md`:15- Fill `**Module:**` with the matched B1 module name.16- Fill `**Archetype:**` with the pattern from the routing table (omit under tight deadline).17- Fill `**Routing reason:**` with one sentence explaining why this module was selected.18- Fill `**Signal confidence:**` with High / Medium / Low.19- Fill `**Time pressure:**` with the user's stated constraint.20- Fill `## 1. Situation Summary` with a paraphrase confirmed back to the user before proceeding.2122# SOP Reference Files23Before coaching, load the relevant reference file:24- **B1 S1** (interviews, stakeholder targeting): read `references/b1s1-interviews.md`25- **B1 S2** (data analysis, robustness): read `references/b1s2-data-analysis.md`2627These files contain exact SOP techniques (5-filter stakeholder targeting, resistance handling, ghost charting template method, 80/20 assumption audit, definition drill, market research critique formula). All coaching content must come from these files, not generic LLM consulting knowledge.2829# B1 S1: Data Collection, Interviews, and Expert Engagement30## Core method31- Start with stakeholder targeting by org map, not functional guesswork.32- Select interviewees by information ownership, bias counterweight, level altitude, buy-in value, and execution credibility.33- Under resistance, pivot from extraction to trust + access path.34- Use open questions first, then clarifying and probing questions.35- Handle talkative experts with precision prompts, paraphrase loops, and ghost-chart templates.36- Structure sessions as intro -> core -> close -> same-day documentation.3738## B1 S1 coaching checklist391. Build stakeholder map and targeting rationale.402. Define interview objective and success signal.413. Prepare resistance handling script.424. Use clarifying/probing sequence to force useful numbers.435. Co-create ghost chart when output ambiguity appears.446. Confirm next steps and document immediately.4546# B1 S2: Analyze Data to Draw Robust Conclusions47## Core method48- Validate external numbers: source, incentives, assumptions, recency, scope.49- Run definition drill before any comparison.50- Critique market research design: sample frame, comparability, attribute coverage, importance weighting.51- Apply 80/20: test high-impact assumptions first.52- Triangulate top-down and bottom-up where possible.53- Synthesize many datapoints into 2-3 executable conclusions with clear implications.5455## B1 S2 coaching checklist561. List critical assumptions and rank by impact.572. Validate high-risk third-party numbers.583. Align metric definitions across sources.594. Audit sample quality and attribute relevance.605. Convert key gaps into dollar impact.616. Produce concise synthesis with next decision implications.6263# Pattern-Adaptive Delivery64Match delivery style to routed archetype.6566## Diagnostic Tree mode67- Use branching tests for data credibility and root-cause uncertainty.68- Prioritize disconfirming checks first.6970## Linear Process mode71- Give ordered workflow from data intake to synthesis output.72- Define artifact at each step.7374## Heuristic mode75- Use practical rules for interview dynamics, evidence quality, and skepticism control.7677# Adaptive Depth by Time Pressure78- `tight deadline`: give full checklist immediately and run minimum viable validation.79- `moderate timeline`: execute one step at a time with frequent quality checks.80- `exploratory`: teach full rationale, alternatives, and anti-patterns.8182# Pattern Trigger83If user says `explain pattern` or `why this approach?`, state:84- Active archetype85- Why it best fits the current data/interview signal86- Why alternative patterns are less efficient now8788# Report Mode: Data/Analysis Report Blueprint89Use when dispatcher flags deliverable-building behavior.9091## Stage 0: Skeleton92Create section skeleton:93- Objective and key questions94- Data sources and definitions95- Methodology and validation checks96- Findings and synthesis97- Risks, limitations, and confidence98- Decision implications and next tests99100## Stage 1: Section blueprint101For requested section, provide:102- Required argument chain103- Evidence checklist104- Common logic failures to avoid105106## Stage 2: Quality gate107Pass only if:108- Definitions are explicit and consistent109- Source credibility is defensible110- Findings are prioritized by impact111- Conclusion is actionable and not a data dump112113# Consulting Blueprint Section Mapping (B1)114Always keep all 8 sections.115116- `1. Situation Summary`: core data/interview challenge, stakeholders, decision context.117- `2. Framework / Approach Selected`: B1 S1 or B1 S2 plus pattern.118- `3. Decision Logic`: why this analysis path, confidence, key assumptions.119- `4. Step-by-Step Playbook`: interview/data-validation/synthesis sequence.120- `5. Evidence Required`: source checks, definitions, sample validity, triangulation needs.121- `6. Quality Gates`: credibility tests, consistency checks, synthesis standards.122- `7. Missing Gaps`: unresolved data, blocked access, uncertain assumptions.123- `8. Next Action`: next interview, data pull, validation test, or synthesis draft.