Context Intake From Dispatcher
Receive and restate:
- Situation
- Stage
- Time pressure
- Matched module (
B2 A or B2 B)
- Confidence and routing reason
Before starting any coaching steps, update blueprint/Blueprint-YYYY-MM-DD.md:
- Fill
**Module:** with the matched B2 module name.
- Fill
**Archetype:** with the pattern from the routing table (omit under tight deadline).
- Fill
**Routing reason:** with one sentence explaining why this module was selected.
- Fill
**Signal confidence:** with High / Medium / Low.
- Fill
**Time pressure:** with the user's stated constraint.
- Fill
## 1. Situation Summary with a paraphrase confirmed back to the user before proceeding.
SOP Reference Files
Before coaching, load the relevant reference file:
- B2 A (de-anchoring, problem definition): read
references/b2a-de-anchoring.md
- B2 B (issue tree, hypothesis tree, workplan): read
references/b2b-issue-tree.md
These files contain exact SOP techniques (agree→reframe→expand script, influence toolkit sequence, ghost charting method, move-the-needle math, fast-fail gates). All coaching content must come from these files, not generic LLM consulting knowledge.
B2 A: Client Alignment, De-Anchor, and Guiding Question
Core method
- Separate objective from preferred lever.
- Use
agree -> reframe -> expand to de-anchor without relationship damage.
- Reframe with objective structure before choosing tactics.
- Define success, scope, constraints, precision level, and sign-off path.
- Distill one guiding question at the right specificity.
- Run client alignment check before any deep tree-building.
B2 A coaching checklist
- State objective in one sentence.
- List at least 2-3 alternative drivers.
- Clarify constraints, deliverable shape, and decision owner.
- Draft guiding question as a decision question.
- Confirm alignment with stakeholder language.
- Propose a short diagnostic scan and decision checkpoint.
B2 B: Issue Tree, Hypothesis Tree, and Feasibility
Core method
- Build a MECE issue tree first for legitimacy and coverage.
- Prune branches using move-the-needle math and benchmark gaps.
- Use hypothesis trees when speed is needed and priors are credible.
- Convert big gaps to dollars before prioritizing.
- Apply fast-fail feasibility gates (regulatory, IT, capability, timeline, cost).
- Convert surviving leaves into leaf-level workplan and ghost-charted outputs.
B2 B coaching checklist
- Build first-level MECE branches.
- Score branch upside (order-of-magnitude).
- Prune low-impact branches.
- Build "what must be true" conditions for top hypotheses.
- Check feasibility kill criteria early.
- Define leaf workplan: analysis, end-product, data, timeline, owner.
Pattern-Adaptive Delivery
Match delivery style to the routed archetype.
Diagnostic Tree mode
- Lead with branching questions.
- Use if/then forks to expose root cause, blockers, and choice points.
- Stop when one branch clearly dominates.
Linear Process mode
- Give a strict step order and required outputs per step.
- Use for execution clarity, handoffs, and pacing.
Heuristic mode
- Give compact rules-of-thumb and trigger phrases.
- Use for high-friction conversations and fast judgment under ambiguity.
Adaptive Depth by Time Pressure
tight deadline: provide full checklist upfront, fastest path, and immediate next action.
moderate timeline: guide step-by-step with checkpoint after each major step.
exploratory: coach deeply, explain pattern choice, and compare alternatives.
Pattern Trigger
If user says explain pattern or why this approach?, state:
- Active archetype
- Why it fits the current signal
- Why alternatives are second-best now
Report Mode: Problem Framing Document Blueprint
Use when dispatcher flags deliverable-building behavior.
Stage 0: Skeleton
Create section skeleton for a problem framing document:
- Objective and decision question
- Scope and constraints
- Working hypotheses
- Issue tree snapshot
- Prioritization logic
- Required analyses and owners
- Risks and mitigations
- Decision checkpoints
Stage 1: Section blueprint
For requested section, provide:
- Required argument logic
- Evidence required
- Quality bar and failure modes
Stage 2: Quality gate
Pass only if:
- Objective is explicit and testable
- Scope is defensible
- Tree is MECE
- Prioritization is impact-led
- Feasibility blockers are addressed
Consulting Blueprint Section Mapping (B2)
Always keep all 8 sections.
1. Situation Summary: objective, context, anchor risk, constraints.
2. Framework / Approach Selected: B2 A or B2 B plus pattern.
3. Decision Logic: why this module, confidence, key assumptions.
4. Step-by-Step Playbook: de-anchor sequence or tree-build/prune workflow.
5. Evidence Required: benchmark inputs, definitions, feasibility checks, missing data.
6. Quality Gates: objective clarity, MECE test, move-the-needle threshold, kill criteria.
7. Missing Gaps: unresolved assumptions, unconfirmed constraints, blocked stakeholders.
8. Next Action: immediate next meeting/question/analysis with owner and timing.
1---2name: consulting-problem-structuring3description: Internal consulting sub-skill for problem definition, de-anchoring, and issue tree coaching (B2 modules). Activated by consulting-playbook dispatcher when B2 signals detected - client anchored on solution, unclear objective, scope disputes, issue tree needed. Do not invoke directly; use consulting-playbook.4---56# Context Intake From Dispatcher7Receive and restate:8- Situation9- Stage10- Time pressure11- Matched module (`B2 A` or `B2 B`)12- Confidence and routing reason1314Before starting any coaching steps, update `blueprint/Blueprint-YYYY-MM-DD.md`:15- Fill `**Module:**` with the matched B2 module name.16- Fill `**Archetype:**` with the pattern from the routing table (omit under tight deadline).17- Fill `**Routing reason:**` with one sentence explaining why this module was selected.18- Fill `**Signal confidence:**` with High / Medium / Low.19- Fill `**Time pressure:**` with the user's stated constraint.20- Fill `## 1. Situation Summary` with a paraphrase confirmed back to the user before proceeding.2122# SOP Reference Files23Before coaching, load the relevant reference file:24- **B2 A** (de-anchoring, problem definition): read `references/b2a-de-anchoring.md`25- **B2 B** (issue tree, hypothesis tree, workplan): read `references/b2b-issue-tree.md`2627These files contain exact SOP techniques (agree→reframe→expand script, influence toolkit sequence, ghost charting method, move-the-needle math, fast-fail gates). All coaching content must come from these files, not generic LLM consulting knowledge.2829# B2 A: Client Alignment, De-Anchor, and Guiding Question30## Core method31- Separate objective from preferred lever.32- Use `agree -> reframe -> expand` to de-anchor without relationship damage.33- Reframe with objective structure before choosing tactics.34- Define success, scope, constraints, precision level, and sign-off path.35- Distill one guiding question at the right specificity.36- Run client alignment check before any deep tree-building.3738## B2 A coaching checklist391. State objective in one sentence.402. List at least 2-3 alternative drivers.413. Clarify constraints, deliverable shape, and decision owner.424. Draft guiding question as a decision question.435. Confirm alignment with stakeholder language.446. Propose a short diagnostic scan and decision checkpoint.4546# B2 B: Issue Tree, Hypothesis Tree, and Feasibility47## Core method48- Build a MECE issue tree first for legitimacy and coverage.49- Prune branches using move-the-needle math and benchmark gaps.50- Use hypothesis trees when speed is needed and priors are credible.51- Convert big gaps to dollars before prioritizing.52- Apply fast-fail feasibility gates (regulatory, IT, capability, timeline, cost).53- Convert surviving leaves into leaf-level workplan and ghost-charted outputs.5455## B2 B coaching checklist561. Build first-level MECE branches.572. Score branch upside (order-of-magnitude).583. Prune low-impact branches.594. Build "what must be true" conditions for top hypotheses.605. Check feasibility kill criteria early.616. Define leaf workplan: analysis, end-product, data, timeline, owner.6263# Pattern-Adaptive Delivery64Match delivery style to the routed archetype.6566## Diagnostic Tree mode67- Lead with branching questions.68- Use if/then forks to expose root cause, blockers, and choice points.69- Stop when one branch clearly dominates.7071## Linear Process mode72- Give a strict step order and required outputs per step.73- Use for execution clarity, handoffs, and pacing.7475## Heuristic mode76- Give compact rules-of-thumb and trigger phrases.77- Use for high-friction conversations and fast judgment under ambiguity.7879# Adaptive Depth by Time Pressure80- `tight deadline`: provide full checklist upfront, fastest path, and immediate next action.81- `moderate timeline`: guide step-by-step with checkpoint after each major step.82- `exploratory`: coach deeply, explain pattern choice, and compare alternatives.8384# Pattern Trigger85If user says `explain pattern` or `why this approach?`, state:86- Active archetype87- Why it fits the current signal88- Why alternatives are second-best now8990# Report Mode: Problem Framing Document Blueprint91Use when dispatcher flags deliverable-building behavior.9293## Stage 0: Skeleton94Create section skeleton for a problem framing document:95- Objective and decision question96- Scope and constraints97- Working hypotheses98- Issue tree snapshot99- Prioritization logic100- Required analyses and owners101- Risks and mitigations102- Decision checkpoints103104## Stage 1: Section blueprint105For requested section, provide:106- Required argument logic107- Evidence required108- Quality bar and failure modes109110## Stage 2: Quality gate111Pass only if:112- Objective is explicit and testable113- Scope is defensible114- Tree is MECE115- Prioritization is impact-led116- Feasibility blockers are addressed117118# Consulting Blueprint Section Mapping (B2)119Always keep all 8 sections.120121- `1. Situation Summary`: objective, context, anchor risk, constraints.122- `2. Framework / Approach Selected`: B2 A or B2 B plus pattern.123- `3. Decision Logic`: why this module, confidence, key assumptions.124- `4. Step-by-Step Playbook`: de-anchor sequence or tree-build/prune workflow.125- `5. Evidence Required`: benchmark inputs, definitions, feasibility checks, missing data.126- `6. Quality Gates`: objective clarity, MECE test, move-the-needle threshold, kill criteria.127- `7. Missing Gaps`: unresolved assumptions, unconfirmed constraints, blocked stakeholders.128- `8. Next Action`: immediate next meeting/question/analysis with owner and timing.