Create Design Document
Repository continuity composition
For repository-scoped work, compose maintain-repository-continuity in
Resume mode before selecting work. After an authorized repository change
passes domain validation, compose Refresh and Verify immediately before
presenting the pull request, and include the reconciled root CONTINUITY.md in
the same change. A policy-permitted no-change or exemption result must be
documented instead of fabricating an edit.
- Contribute: Experience flows, constraints, research evidence, validation, and unresolved design choices
- Never claim: That user evidence, accessibility validation, or design approval exists when it was not observed
Purpose
Create or update DESIGN.md in conformance with
architecture-design.
The document must answer:
What kind of experience should this create, and why should it feel that way?
Use This Skill When
- the canonical experience document is missing
- experience intent or design language is inconsistent
- upstream identity or personal-model architecture has changed
- a product is establishing or repairing its experience architecture
- downstream design or implementation needs a stable source of truth
Required Inputs
Resolve:
- the governing specification
- required upstream architecture documents
- relevant user, accessibility, and design evidence
- existing product experiences
- known inconsistencies and exceptions
- downstream consumers
Missing evidence must be recorded rather than invented.
Workflow
- read purpose, principles, and the personal model
- inventory existing experience claims and assumptions
- separate experience intent from visual or technical implementation
- define experiential qualities, interaction philosophy, and communication philosophy
- define accessibility, agency, cognitive-load, trust, and recovery expectations
- define aesthetic direction and design anti-goals
- test the philosophy across multiple products and surfaces
- record evidence, assumptions, contradictions, and open questions
- identify downstream design-system implications
Output Contract
Produce:
DESIGN.md
- governing specification identifier and version
- evidence, assumptions, and unresolved questions
- validation results
- downstream migration or review recommendations
Constraints
- Preserve human agency and accessibility.
- Separate experience intent from implementation.
- Do not fabricate user needs or research findings.
- Do not silently resolve contradictions.
- Do not treat one product implementation as universally canonical.
- Do not claim completion when required evidence is missing.
Validation
Use:
references/validation-checklist.md
and the acceptance criteria in:
architecture-design
Completion Criteria
1---2name: create-design-document3description: Creates or refines DESIGN.md using the corresponding Aether architecture specification. Use when a project needs to establish, update, or validate its design experience documentation.4license: MIT5---67# Create Design Document89<!-- aether-continuity-disposition: reader-writer -->1011## Repository continuity composition1213For repository-scoped work, compose `maintain-repository-continuity` in14**Resume** mode before selecting work. After an authorized repository change15passes domain validation, compose **Refresh** and **Verify** immediately before16presenting the pull request, and include the reconciled root `CONTINUITY.md` in17the same change. A policy-permitted no-change or exemption result must be18documented instead of fabricating an edit.1920- **Contribute:** Experience flows, constraints, research evidence, validation, and unresolved design choices21- **Never claim:** That user evidence, accessibility validation, or design approval exists when it was not observed2223## Purpose2425Create or update `DESIGN.md` in conformance with26`architecture-design`.2728The document must answer:2930> What kind of experience should this create, and why should it feel that way?3132## Use This Skill When3334- the canonical experience document is missing35- experience intent or design language is inconsistent36- upstream identity or personal-model architecture has changed37- a product is establishing or repairing its experience architecture38- downstream design or implementation needs a stable source of truth3940## Required Inputs4142Resolve:4344- the governing specification45- required upstream architecture documents46- relevant user, accessibility, and design evidence47- existing product experiences48- known inconsistencies and exceptions49- downstream consumers5051Missing evidence must be recorded rather than invented.5253## Workflow54551. read purpose, principles, and the personal model562. inventory existing experience claims and assumptions573. separate experience intent from visual or technical implementation584. define experiential qualities, interaction philosophy, and communication philosophy595. define accessibility, agency, cognitive-load, trust, and recovery expectations606. define aesthetic direction and design anti-goals617. test the philosophy across multiple products and surfaces628. record evidence, assumptions, contradictions, and open questions639. identify downstream design-system implications6465## Output Contract6667Produce:6869- `DESIGN.md`70- governing specification identifier and version71- evidence, assumptions, and unresolved questions72- validation results73- downstream migration or review recommendations7475## Constraints7677- Preserve human agency and accessibility.78- Separate experience intent from implementation.79- Do not fabricate user needs or research findings.80- Do not silently resolve contradictions.81- Do not treat one product implementation as universally canonical.82- Do not claim completion when required evidence is missing.8384## Validation8586Use:8788 references/validation-checklist.md8990and the acceptance criteria in:9192 architecture-design9394## Completion Criteria9596- [ ] The governing specification is identified.97- [ ] Required upstream artifacts have been read.98- [ ] The primary question is answered.99- [ ] Responsibilities and non-responsibilities are respected.100- [ ] Accessibility and agency are addressed.101- [ ] Evidence, assumptions, and open questions are visible.102- [ ] Downstream impacts are reported.