Create Design System Document
Repository continuity composition
For repository-scoped work, compose maintain-repository-continuity in
Resume mode before selecting work. After an authorized repository change
passes domain validation, compose Refresh and Verify immediately before
presenting the pull request, and include the reconciled root CONTINUITY.md in
the same change. A policy-permitted no-change or exemption result must be
documented instead of fabricating an edit.
- Contribute: Design tokens, components, accessibility constraints, adoption state, and validation
- Never claim: That a documented design-system rule is implemented or adopted without evidence
Purpose
Create or update DESIGN_SYSTEM.md in conformance with
architecture-design-system.
The document must answer:
How should the intended experience be expressed consistently across products, platforms, and implementations?
Use This Skill When
- the canonical experience document is missing
- experience intent or design language is inconsistent
- upstream identity or personal-model architecture has changed
- a product is establishing or repairing its experience architecture
- downstream design or implementation needs a stable source of truth
Required Inputs
Resolve:
- the governing specification
- required upstream architecture documents
- relevant user, accessibility, and design evidence
- existing product experiences
- known inconsistencies and exceptions
- downstream consumers
Missing evidence must be recorded rather than invented.
Workflow
- read the design philosophy and personal model
- inventory existing visual, interaction, content, and motion patterns
- separate semantic roles from implementation values
- identify reusable patterns, variants, and local exceptions
- define accessibility guarantees and input-state coverage
- define hierarchy, typography, color, spacing, surfaces, imagery, and motion
- define feedback, errors, recovery, responsive behavior, and content patterns
- define product-identity variation and theming boundaries
- define contribution, governance, and deprecation behavior
- validate downstream token and component implementability
Output Contract
Produce:
DESIGN_SYSTEM.md
- governing specification identifier and version
- evidence, assumptions, and unresolved questions
- validation results
- downstream migration or review recommendations
Constraints
- Preserve human agency and accessibility.
- Separate experience intent from implementation.
- Do not fabricate user needs or research findings.
- Do not silently resolve contradictions.
- Do not treat one product implementation as universally canonical.
- Do not claim completion when required evidence is missing.
Validation
Use:
references/validation-checklist.md
and the acceptance criteria in:
architecture-design-system
Completion Criteria
1---2name: create-design-system-document3description: Creates or refines DESIGN_SYSTEM.md using the corresponding Aether architecture specification. Use when a project needs to establish or update its canonical design system documentation.4license: MIT5---67# Create Design System Document89<!-- aether-continuity-disposition: reader-writer -->1011## Repository continuity composition1213For repository-scoped work, compose `maintain-repository-continuity` in14**Resume** mode before selecting work. After an authorized repository change15passes domain validation, compose **Refresh** and **Verify** immediately before16presenting the pull request, and include the reconciled root `CONTINUITY.md` in17the same change. A policy-permitted no-change or exemption result must be18documented instead of fabricating an edit.1920- **Contribute:** Design tokens, components, accessibility constraints, adoption state, and validation21- **Never claim:** That a documented design-system rule is implemented or adopted without evidence2223## Purpose2425Create or update `DESIGN_SYSTEM.md` in conformance with26`architecture-design-system`.2728The document must answer:2930> How should the intended experience be expressed consistently across products, platforms, and implementations?3132## Use This Skill When3334- the canonical experience document is missing35- experience intent or design language is inconsistent36- upstream identity or personal-model architecture has changed37- a product is establishing or repairing its experience architecture38- downstream design or implementation needs a stable source of truth3940## Required Inputs4142Resolve:4344- the governing specification45- required upstream architecture documents46- relevant user, accessibility, and design evidence47- existing product experiences48- known inconsistencies and exceptions49- downstream consumers5051Missing evidence must be recorded rather than invented.5253## Workflow54551. read the design philosophy and personal model562. inventory existing visual, interaction, content, and motion patterns573. separate semantic roles from implementation values584. identify reusable patterns, variants, and local exceptions595. define accessibility guarantees and input-state coverage606. define hierarchy, typography, color, spacing, surfaces, imagery, and motion617. define feedback, errors, recovery, responsive behavior, and content patterns628. define product-identity variation and theming boundaries639. define contribution, governance, and deprecation behavior6410. validate downstream token and component implementability6566## Output Contract6768Produce:6970- `DESIGN_SYSTEM.md`71- governing specification identifier and version72- evidence, assumptions, and unresolved questions73- validation results74- downstream migration or review recommendations7576## Constraints7778- Preserve human agency and accessibility.79- Separate experience intent from implementation.80- Do not fabricate user needs or research findings.81- Do not silently resolve contradictions.82- Do not treat one product implementation as universally canonical.83- Do not claim completion when required evidence is missing.8485## Validation8687Use:8889 references/validation-checklist.md9091and the acceptance criteria in:9293 architecture-design-system9495## Completion Criteria9697- [ ] The governing specification is identified.98- [ ] Required upstream artifacts have been read.99- [ ] The primary question is answered.100- [ ] Responsibilities and non-responsibilities are respected.101- [ ] Accessibility and agency are addressed.102- [ ] Evidence, assumptions, and open questions are visible.103- [ ] Downstream impacts are reported.