How do I install the Contract Review Risk Scoring skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add eigent-ai/contract-review-risk-scoring in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Contract Review Risk Scoring safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Contract Review Risk Scoring?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Contract Review Risk Scoring free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Contract Review Risk Scoring?

eigent-ai (@eigent-ai) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Contract Review Risk Scoring by eigent-ai

Name: Contract Review Risk Scoring
Author: eigent-ai

Contract Review Risk Scoring

Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.

eigent-ai Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Contract Review & Risk Scoring

Focused contract review built on CUAD (41 risk categories), ContractEval benchmarks, and LegalBench.

Source Repository

GitHub: evolsb/claude-legal-skill
Install upstream: npx skills add evolsb/claude-legal-skill

Covers NDAs, SaaS/MSA, M&A, payment agreements, and finder/broker agreements.

`/review [contract] as [your position]`

Core skill. Reads the full contract, maps clauses against CUAD's 41 risk categories, assigns severity (low / medium / high / critical), benchmarks key terms against market norms, and outputs a prioritised fix list with concrete redline language. Finishes with an overall Contract Safety Score.

Workflow:

Confirm document type and user's position (customer, vendor, receiving party, acquirer, etc.).
Parse and enumerate all material clauses.
Score each clause against CUAD risk categories.
Benchmark flagged terms vs market norms.
Assign negotiability rating per issue (easy / moderate / hard).
Draft specific redline language for top issues.
Output Contract Safety Score (0–100) with summary.

Output structure:

## Contract Safety Score: [score]/100

## Critical Issues (fix before signing)
## High / Medium / Low Issues
## Market Benchmark Comparison
## Recommended Redlines (prioritised)
## Negotiation Strategy Notes

Example Prompts

Review this NDA [paste] — I'm the receiving party. Flag unusual confidentiality scope, one-sided carve-outs, non-compete buried in obligations. Contract Safety Score + top 3 redlines.
Review this SaaS subscription agreement [paste] — I'm the customer. Check liability caps, data ownership, unilateral change clauses, auto-renewal. Compare to market norms.
Review this LOI [paste] — I'm the acquirer. Flag provisions locking us in early, limiting diligence rights, or unusual exclusivity. Score overall risk; critical issues first.

Guardrails

This is decision support, not legal advice. Include a disclaimer when delivering output.
Do not skip boilerplate — buried risk often lives in definitions and general provisions.
When contract text is incomplete, state what cannot be assessed.
Prefer specific redline language over vague "negotiate this" notes.

---name: contract-review-risk-scoringdescription: Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.---# Contract Review & Risk ScoringFocused contract review built on CUAD (41 risk categories), ContractEval benchmarks, and LegalBench.## Source Repository- **GitHub:** [evolsb/claude-legal-skill](https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill)- **Install upstream:** `npx skills add evolsb/claude-legal-skill`Covers NDAs, SaaS/MSA, M&A, payment agreements, and finder/broker agreements.---## `/review [contract] as [your position]`Core skill. Reads the full contract, maps clauses against CUAD's 41 risk categories, assigns severity (low / medium / high / critical), benchmarks key terms against market norms, and outputs a prioritised fix list with concrete redline language. Finishes with an overall **Contract Safety Score**.**Workflow:**1. Confirm document type and user's position (customer, vendor, receiving party, acquirer, etc.).2. Parse and enumerate all material clauses.3. Score each clause against CUAD risk categories.4. Benchmark flagged terms vs market norms.5. Assign negotiability rating per issue (easy / moderate / hard).6. Draft specific redline language for top issues.7. Output Contract Safety Score (0–100) with summary.**Output structure:**```## Contract Safety Score: [score]/100## Critical Issues (fix before signing)## High / Medium / Low Issues## Market Benchmark Comparison## Recommended Redlines (prioritised)## Negotiation Strategy Notes```---## Example Prompts- Review this NDA [paste] — I'm the receiving party. Flag unusual confidentiality scope, one-sided carve-outs, non-compete buried in obligations. Contract Safety Score + top 3 redlines.- Review this SaaS subscription agreement [paste] — I'm the customer. Check liability caps, data ownership, unilateral change clauses, auto-renewal. Compare to market norms.- Review this LOI [paste] — I'm the acquirer. Flag provisions locking us in early, limiting diligence rights, or unusual exclusivity. Score overall risk; critical issues first.---## Guardrails- This is decision support, not legal advice. Include a disclaimer when delivering output.- Do not skip boilerplate — buried risk often lives in definitions and general provisions.- When contract text is incomplete, state what cannot be assessed.- Prefer specific redline language over vague "negotiate this" notes.

Frequently asked questions