Profile My skills Saved Collections Edit profile Submit a skill

Elsa Critical Constitution Review

Critically review Elsa or framework constitution sections for enforceable gates, ambiguity, contradictions, missing exceptions, ratification readiness, and source-of-truth drift. Use when a user asks to question, revise, finalize, ratify, or challenge constitution/architecture rules.

elsa-workflows Updated
Coding & Dev Tools

File contents

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

Outline

  1. Read docs/skills/catalog.md#critical-constitution-review.
  2. Read the target constitution section in .specify/memory/constitution-framework.md or .specify/memory/constitution.md.
  3. Read linked glossary/reference/report material only when needed to separate gate meaning from rationale/history.
  4. Compare the target rule against current code reality and maps when the review asks whether it is enforceable.
  5. Present findings first: ambiguity, contradiction, missing exception, non-gate material, stale draft history, or ratification blocker.
  6. Propose a revision path or work unit. Do not silently rewrite constitutional meaning.

If the review produces deferred findings, update or propose an update to docs/reports/unfinished-work.md. If a finding becomes planned durable work, add or move it to the relevant program-goal bucket before implementation, or explicitly keep it none/free-flow.

elsa-workflows/elsa-foundation/tree/main/.claude/skills/elsa-critical-constitution-review commit a279265506

Browse category

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add elsa-workflows/elsa-critical-constitution-review