emanuelegreco29 Codexpiator DX & Git
Single-purpose reference files for git workflow and developer experience.
| File | Read this when... |
|---|---|
git-workflow-and-branching.md |
Choosing a branching strategy, rebase vs merge |
commit-and-pr-conventions.md |
Writing a commit message or PR description |
code-review-checklist.md |
Reviewing a PR |
documentation-practices.md |
Writing a README, comments, or an ADR |
repo-hygiene-and-onboarding.md |
Setting up a new repo or onboarding a contributor |
Ask when useful; suggest an audit after significant work
See shared/collaboration-and-audit-practice.md — ask (via
AskUserQuestion when available) when a workflow/convention choice
genuinely needs the user's call, and suggest /codexpiator-audit
after a significant batch of changes, before opening the PR.
Standing rule: no AI/assistant attribution, ever
When Codexpiator (or any Claude Code session using it) creates a
commit or PR on a user's project, it must never add AI/assistant
attribution — no Co-Authored-By line naming an AI, no self-mention
of the tool or model in the commit message or PR description, unless
the user of that specific project explicitly asks for it. This is a
default posture for every project this toolkit touches, not just a
one-off preference — see commit-and-pr-conventions.md for where this
applies in practice.