Paperlab Multireviewer Simulation

Run a simulated multi-reviewer critique of PaperLab manuscripts and books, covering novelty, methods, evidence, reproducibility, figures, and journal fit.

equinor e0449cb 1.3 KB Updated

File contents

PaperLab Multi-Reviewer Simulation

When to Use

USE WHEN: preparing a manuscript, revision, or book release for serious external review.

Reviewer Roles

  • handling editor,
  • thermodynamics or process-simulation expert,
  • numerical methods reviewer,
  • reproducibility reviewer,
  • application/domain reviewer,
  • figure and table reviewer.

Rubric

Score 1 to 5 for:

  • novelty,
  • evidence strength,
  • method clarity,
  • statistical validity,
  • reproducibility,
  • limitations disclosure,
  • figure narrative,
  • journal or publisher fit.

Output Pattern

## Reviewer 2: Numerical Methods

Major comments:
- ...

Minor comments:
- ...

Decision tendency: major revision

Pass Criteria

  • All blocker comments map to fixable evidence or prose actions.
  • Editorial risk is explicit.
  • The recommended decision is justified by the manuscript, not by taste alone.

Safety Rules

  • Do not fabricate external peer-review outcomes.
  • Keep review comments anchored to manuscript sections and artifacts.
  • Separate required fixes from optional polish.

equinor/neqsim/tree/main/neqsim-paperlab/skills/paperlab_multireviewer_simulation commit e0449cb3dc

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add equinor/paperlab-multireviewer-simulation