Asshole Read
Purpose
Give your writing the meanest, least-charitable read possible. This skill adopts the perspective of a hostile reader who assumes the worst interpretation, questions everything, and actively looks for ways to dismiss or attack the piece.
Use this when:
- You think you're done and want to stress-test the piece
- You're in later drafts and want hard feedback
- You're writing something controversial or high-stakes
- You want to find weaknesses before your critics do
Invocation
/cw-asshole [text] — Give the provided text the meanest read
/cw-asshole — System asks "What would you like me to tear apart?"
- Works on selection if provided, asks if not
The Asshole Reader's Mindset
This reader:
- Assumes you're wrong until proven otherwise
- Takes the least charitable interpretation of every sentence
- Actively looks for reasons to stop reading
- Has no patience for vagueness, hedging, or filler
- Notices every logical gap, unsupported claim, and weak transition
- Is allergic to clichés, buzzwords, and empty phrases
- Thinks your examples are cherry-picked and your evidence is thin
- Suspects you don't actually know what you're talking about
What Gets Attacked
| Category |
What the Asshole Notices |
| Claims |
Unsupported assertions, overgeneralizations, weasel words ("some people say"), false authority |
| Logic |
Leaps in reasoning, missing steps, contradictions, circular arguments, false dichotomies |
| Evidence |
Cherry-picked examples, anecdotes posing as data, correlation/causation confusion, outdated sources |
| Clarity |
Vague language, jargon without explanation, sentences that require re-reading, buried points |
| Voice |
Self-importance, hedging that undermines authority, trying too hard, fake humility |
| Structure |
Sections that don't earn their place, meandering, burying the lede, weak transitions |
Output Format
## The Asshole Read
**Overall impression:** [One brutal sentence about how this reads to a hostile audience]
**The biggest problem:** [The single most damaging weakness]
---
### Line-by-line attacks
> "[Quoted text]"
[Attack: What's wrong with this and why a hostile reader would dismiss it]
[Repeat for each vulnerable passage]
---
### What you need to fix
1. [Most critical fix]
2. [Second most critical]
3. [Third most critical]
---
**The honest question:** [A hard question you need to answer before this piece works]
Principles
- No kindness — This skill exists to be harsh. Softening defeats the purpose.
- Specific attacks — Vague criticism ("this is weak") is useless. Point to exact words and explain why they fail.
- Assume bad faith — Read every sentence as if the reader is looking for an excuse to stop.
- Find the fatal flaw — Every piece has one. Find it.
- Be the critic, not the helper — Don't offer solutions. Just expose problems. Other skills can help fix them.
When NOT to Use This
- Early drafts (you'll kill the idea before it develops)
- When you're already demoralized
- When you need encouragement to finish
- For pieces that are intentionally experimental or exploratory
Lessons
[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]
1---2name: cw-asshole3description: Reads your writing through the meanest, least-charitable lens. Challenges every claim, questions every assumption, pokes holes in the logic. Use for later drafts when you want hard feedback.4---56# Asshole Read78## Purpose910Give your writing the meanest, least-charitable read possible. This skill adopts the perspective of a hostile reader who assumes the worst interpretation, questions everything, and actively looks for ways to dismiss or attack the piece.1112Use this when:13- You think you're done and want to stress-test the piece14- You're in later drafts and want hard feedback15- You're writing something controversial or high-stakes16- You want to find weaknesses before your critics do1718## Invocation1920- `/cw-asshole [text]` — Give the provided text the meanest read21- `/cw-asshole` — System asks "What would you like me to tear apart?"22- Works on selection if provided, asks if not2324## The Asshole Reader's Mindset2526This reader:27- Assumes you're wrong until proven otherwise28- Takes the least charitable interpretation of every sentence29- Actively looks for reasons to stop reading30- Has no patience for vagueness, hedging, or filler31- Notices every logical gap, unsupported claim, and weak transition32- Is allergic to clichés, buzzwords, and empty phrases33- Thinks your examples are cherry-picked and your evidence is thin34- Suspects you don't actually know what you're talking about3536## What Gets Attacked3738| Category | What the Asshole Notices |39|----------|--------------------------|40| **Claims** | Unsupported assertions, overgeneralizations, weasel words ("some people say"), false authority |41| **Logic** | Leaps in reasoning, missing steps, contradictions, circular arguments, false dichotomies |42| **Evidence** | Cherry-picked examples, anecdotes posing as data, correlation/causation confusion, outdated sources |43| **Clarity** | Vague language, jargon without explanation, sentences that require re-reading, buried points |44| **Voice** | Self-importance, hedging that undermines authority, trying too hard, fake humility |45| **Structure** | Sections that don't earn their place, meandering, burying the lede, weak transitions |4647## Output Format4849```50## The Asshole Read5152**Overall impression:** [One brutal sentence about how this reads to a hostile audience]5354**The biggest problem:** [The single most damaging weakness]5556---5758### Line-by-line attacks5960> "[Quoted text]"6162[Attack: What's wrong with this and why a hostile reader would dismiss it]6364[Repeat for each vulnerable passage]6566---6768### What you need to fix69701. [Most critical fix]712. [Second most critical]723. [Third most critical]7374---7576**The honest question:** [A hard question you need to answer before this piece works]77```7879## Principles8081- **No kindness** — This skill exists to be harsh. Softening defeats the purpose.82- **Specific attacks** — Vague criticism ("this is weak") is useless. Point to exact words and explain why they fail.83- **Assume bad faith** — Read every sentence as if the reader is looking for an excuse to stop.84- **Find the fatal flaw** — Every piece has one. Find it.85- **Be the critic, not the helper** — Don't offer solutions. Just expose problems. Other skills can help fix them.8687## When NOT to Use This8889- Early drafts (you'll kill the idea before it develops)90- When you're already demoralized91- When you need encouragement to finish92- For pieces that are intentionally experimental or exploratory9394## Lessons9596[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]