Launch Brief
Generates the Week 1 foundation brief for an L/XL launch — the document every gate, calendar, and channel asset hangs on. The brief is the launch's constitution: if it's wrong, everything downstream inherits the error, which is why it carries the heaviest approval roster in the process.
When to invoke
- Week 1 of any L/XL launch ("write the launch brief for [product]")
- A launch is being stood up and no brief exists
- Re-baselining after a meaningful product change (canon edge rule 1 — a pure calendar slip does not reopen the brief)
The brief's anatomy (canon Week 1, in order)
- Launch date + feature freeze — confirmed by the product owner or the entire brief is marked DRAFT on its face.
- Subscriber lens — can all our subscribers use it? A "no" here is a strategy conversation, not a footnote.
- Customer profile — one core psychographic or professional target, sub-targets
allowed, laddering to one–two archetypes (Builder, Operator, Seeker, Executive).
Feeling-first archetype analysis per
marketing-science/archetyping, not projection. - Why / success / how — why we're doing this, what defines success, and how we drive it. Separate business, activation, proof, learning, and brand outcomes; name the decisions the measures will inform.
- Dream tweet and dream headline — written out verbatim. These are the retro's scoring rubric; vague versions make the retro unscoreable. The headline should validate the intended category belief or customer outcome, not repeat the tagline.
- Positioning and story — what we made, why we made it, who it's for. For net-new
products, the why-now / why-us / why-this narrative discipline from
launches/new-product-launchapplies. - Competitive picture — the
marketing-science/researchcompetitive-audit summary, source-linked. - Pricing owner named — Brandon + the product GM (canon ruling); target lock at the wireframe gate, hard lock Monday of the Launch Week window.
- Roster — collected for this launch and never inherited.
- Approval record — Douglas, Brandon + GM (co-rule), stakeholders, Dan, Austin; with dates. An unapproved brief blocks Week 2 (canon Rule 3).
- GTM handoff — mark the primary customer, buyer/champion/user roles, market tension,
positioning inputs, verified internal proof, and open product truths that
marketing/gtmmust inherit. Do not pre-write the channel plan inside the brief.
Rules
- Facts the model cannot know (dates, freezes, rosters, product truths) are collected from the humans who own them and attributed; gaps are marked OPEN, never filled with plausible text.
- The brief states its own confirmation status at the top.
- Length discipline: the brief is read at a gate meeting — pages, not a deck.
Dependencies
foundation/marketing-oslaunches/canonical-process.md(Week 1 checklist, rosters, epistemic rules)marketing-science/archetyping·marketing-science/researchpositioning/every-master·positioning/{product}(dynamically)marketing-science/researchcompetitive-audit output as inputlaunches/new-product-launch(narrative discipline, for net-new products)
Downstream: the approved brief becomes an input to the flagship mode in marketing/gtm.
Quick checklist
- Date + freeze confirmation status stated on the face of the doc
- Subscriber lens answered, escalated if "no"
- Customer profile laddered to archetypes, feeling-first
- Dream tweet + dream headline verbatim (the retro rubric)
- GTM handoff names the primary customer, role system, tension, proof, and OPEN truths
- Competitive claims source-linked
- Pricing owner named per the Brandon + GM ruling
- Roster collected fresh; OPEN items marked, not filled
- Approval record present: Douglas, Brandon + GM, stakeholders, Dan, Austin