Academic register — MBS4820
The core distinction: descriptive vs critical
Almost every mark lost on writing quality traces to one habit — describing what sources say
instead of doing something with them.
| Descriptive (Pass) |
Critical (Distinction) |
| "Porter (1980) identifies five forces." |
"Porter's (1980) framework treats industry structure as stable, which understates how quickly platform entrants have reshaped last-mile economics." |
| "The market is growing rapidly." |
"Growth of X% annually (Source, 2025) outpaces incumbent capacity expansion of Y% (Source, 2024), leaving an addressable gap of roughly Z parcels per day." |
| "Several authors have studied this." |
"Autio and Zander (2016) attribute this to institutional voids; Sarasvathy (2001) locates it in founder logic instead. The distinction matters here because…" |
| "FedEx is a large logistics company." |
"FedEx's scale advantage in intercontinental air freight does not transfer to intra-GCC ground density, where its cost per drop is structurally higher than a regional operator's." |
Every paragraph should either advance an argument or be cut.
Paragraph architecture
Build each paragraph on this spine:
- Claim — the point, stated first. One sentence.
- Evidence — cited data or literature supporting it.
- Analysis — what the evidence means, why it holds, where it is contestable.
- Link — how this bears on the venture or the next point.
The most common failure is a paragraph that stops after step 2. Evidence without
interpretation is a quotation, not an argument.
Calibrating claims
Match the strength of the language to the strength of the evidence.
| Evidence |
Language |
| Audited filing, official statistic |
"FedEx reported…", "The data show…" |
| Multiple independent sources agree |
"The evidence indicates…", "Consistently across sources…" |
| Single credible source |
"Statista (2025) reports…", "One estimate places…" |
| Your inference from data |
"This suggests…", "A plausible reading is…" |
| Projection or assumption |
"On the assumption that…", "This model assumes…" |
Never write "clearly", "obviously", or "it is well known that" — they assert rather than
evidence. Never present a projection as a finding.
British English
Middlesex is a UK institution. Hold these throughout:
-ise not -ize: organise, analyse, recognise, prioritise, emphasise
-our: behaviour, labour, favourable
-re: centre, metre, theatre
- programme (not program, except software), licence (noun) / license (verb),
practice (noun) / practise (verb), enquiry, defence, fulfil, modelling, labelled
- Dates: 18 August 2026
- Currency: state the basis — AED or USD — and any conversion rate with its date
- Single quotation marks for article titles in the reference list, as shown in
harvard-mdx
Structural conventions
- Paragraph form, not bullets. The module team says so explicitly. Bullets are
acceptable only for genuine lists — SMART objectives, appendix items.
- Third person. Avoid "I" and "we" in the proposal and report body; use "this project",
"the proposed venture", "the analysis". Some supervisors permit first person in
reflective sections — ask before using it.
- Present tense for what sources argue ("Porter argues"), past tense for what was done
("data were collected"), future or conditional for the plan ("the venture will target").
- Define every acronym at first use: "courier, express and parcel (CEP)".
- Tables and figures numbered and captioned, each referred to in the text. A figure nobody
refers to is decoration.
Editing out AI tells
These patterns read as machine-generated to markers and to Turnitin's AI indicator. Strip
them. (The humanizer skill covers this ground in depth; this is the capstone-specific
subset.)
Vocabulary to cut: delve, leverage (as a verb), robust, pivotal, crucial, seamless,
underscore, testament, landscape (figurative), realm, tapestry, myriad, plethora,
navigate (figurative), foster, harness, unlock, transformative, game-changing,
comprehensive, holistic, multifaceted, ever-evolving, rapidly changing.
Constructions to cut:
- Rule of three — "efficient, scalable, and sustainable". Real analysis rarely arrives in
perfect triples. Use one precise adjective or two, and vary.
- Negative parallelism — "It is not just X, it is Y." Almost always padding.
- Superficial -ing analysis — "…, highlighting the importance of…", "…, reflecting the
growing need for…". These append an unearned conclusion to a fact. State the conclusion
properly or drop it.
- Vague attribution — "experts suggest", "studies show", "it is widely believed". Name
the source or delete the claim.
- Promotional register — "stands as a testament to", "plays a vital role in",
"revolutionary". Academic writing is flat and precise.
- Em-dash overuse — one per paragraph at most; prefer commas, colons, and full stops.
- Formulaic openers — "In today's fast-paced business environment", "In an era of".
- Hollow closers — "Ultimately, success will depend on a range of factors."
Rhythm: vary sentence length deliberately. Uniform 20-to-25-word sentences are the
strongest AI signal of all. Put a short sentence after a long one. Let some paragraphs run
five sentences and others two.
Section-opening patterns that work
Instead of "This section will discuss…", open with the substance:
- "The UAE's courier market divides into three tiers, and only one is contestable by a new
entrant."
- "Two features of FedEx's cost structure matter for this venture."
- "The methodology is shaped by a single constraint: no primary data."
Signposting is fine in a 10,000-word report; announcing is not.
Before submission
Read the full draft aloud, or have it read aloud. Every sentence that is hard to say is
hard to read. This catches more than any checklist.
Then verify:
1---2name: academic-register3description: How to write MBA capstone prose that reads as distinction-level human academic writing — critical rather than descriptive voice, evidence-led paragraph construction, hedging and claim calibration, British English conventions, and the AI-tell patterns that must be edited out. Use when drafting or revising any prose for the proposal or report, and as the style authority before any submission.4---56# Academic register — MBS482078## The core distinction: descriptive vs critical910Almost every mark lost on writing quality traces to one habit — describing what sources say11instead of doing something with them.1213| Descriptive (Pass) | Critical (Distinction) |14|---|---|15| "Porter (1980) identifies five forces." | "Porter's (1980) framework treats industry structure as stable, which understates how quickly platform entrants have reshaped last-mile economics." |16| "The market is growing rapidly." | "Growth of X% annually (Source, 2025) outpaces incumbent capacity expansion of Y% (Source, 2024), leaving an addressable gap of roughly Z parcels per day." |17| "Several authors have studied this." | "Autio and Zander (2016) attribute this to institutional voids; Sarasvathy (2001) locates it in founder logic instead. The distinction matters here because…" |18| "FedEx is a large logistics company." | "FedEx's scale advantage in intercontinental air freight does not transfer to intra-GCC ground density, where its cost per drop is structurally higher than a regional operator's." |1920Every paragraph should either advance an argument or be cut.2122## Paragraph architecture2324Build each paragraph on this spine:25261. **Claim** — the point, stated first. One sentence.272. **Evidence** — cited data or literature supporting it.283. **Analysis** — what the evidence means, why it holds, where it is contestable.294. **Link** — how this bears on the venture or the next point.3031The most common failure is a paragraph that stops after step 2. Evidence without32interpretation is a quotation, not an argument.3334## Calibrating claims3536Match the strength of the language to the strength of the evidence.3738| Evidence | Language |39|---|---|40| Audited filing, official statistic | "FedEx reported…", "The data show…" |41| Multiple independent sources agree | "The evidence indicates…", "Consistently across sources…" |42| Single credible source | "Statista (2025) reports…", "One estimate places…" |43| Your inference from data | "This suggests…", "A plausible reading is…" |44| Projection or assumption | "On the assumption that…", "This model assumes…" |4546Never write "clearly", "obviously", or "it is well known that" — they assert rather than47evidence. Never present a projection as a finding.4849## British English5051Middlesex is a UK institution. Hold these throughout:5253- `-ise` not `-ize`: organise, analyse, recognise, prioritise, emphasise54- `-our`: behaviour, labour, favourable55- `-re`: centre, metre, theatre56- programme (not program, except software), licence (noun) / license (verb),57 practice (noun) / practise (verb), enquiry, defence, fulfil, modelling, labelled58- Dates: 18 August 202659- Currency: state the basis — AED or USD — and any conversion rate with its date60- Single quotation marks for article titles in the reference list, as shown in `harvard-mdx`6162## Structural conventions6364- **Paragraph form**, not bullets. The module team says so explicitly. Bullets are65 acceptable only for genuine lists — SMART objectives, appendix items.66- Third person. Avoid "I" and "we" in the proposal and report body; use "this project",67 "the proposed venture", "the analysis". Some supervisors permit first person in68 reflective sections — ask before using it.69- Present tense for what sources argue ("Porter argues"), past tense for what was done70 ("data were collected"), future or conditional for the plan ("the venture will target").71- Define every acronym at first use: "courier, express and parcel (CEP)".72- Tables and figures numbered and captioned, each referred to in the text. A figure nobody73 refers to is decoration.7475## Editing out AI tells7677These patterns read as machine-generated to markers and to Turnitin's AI indicator. Strip78them. (The `humanizer` skill covers this ground in depth; this is the capstone-specific79subset.)8081**Vocabulary to cut:** delve, leverage (as a verb), robust, pivotal, crucial, seamless,82underscore, testament, landscape (figurative), realm, tapestry, myriad, plethora,83navigate (figurative), foster, harness, unlock, transformative, game-changing,84comprehensive, holistic, multifaceted, ever-evolving, rapidly changing.8586**Constructions to cut:**8788- *Rule of three* — "efficient, scalable, and sustainable". Real analysis rarely arrives in89 perfect triples. Use one precise adjective or two, and vary.90- *Negative parallelism* — "It is not just X, it is Y." Almost always padding.91- *Superficial -ing analysis* — "…, highlighting the importance of…", "…, reflecting the92 growing need for…". These append an unearned conclusion to a fact. State the conclusion93 properly or drop it.94- *Vague attribution* — "experts suggest", "studies show", "it is widely believed". Name95 the source or delete the claim.96- *Promotional register* — "stands as a testament to", "plays a vital role in",97 "revolutionary". Academic writing is flat and precise.98- *Em-dash overuse* — one per paragraph at most; prefer commas, colons, and full stops.99- *Formulaic openers* — "In today's fast-paced business environment", "In an era of".100- *Hollow closers* — "Ultimately, success will depend on a range of factors."101102**Rhythm:** vary sentence length deliberately. Uniform 20-to-25-word sentences are the103strongest AI signal of all. Put a short sentence after a long one. Let some paragraphs run104five sentences and others two.105106## Section-opening patterns that work107108Instead of "This section will discuss…", open with the substance:109110- "The UAE's courier market divides into three tiers, and only one is contestable by a new111 entrant."112- "Two features of FedEx's cost structure matter for this venture."113- "The methodology is shaped by a single constraint: no primary data."114115Signposting is fine in a 10,000-word report; announcing is not.116117## Before submission118119Read the full draft aloud, or have it read aloud. Every sentence that is hard to say is120hard to read. This catches more than any checklist.121122Then verify:123124- [ ] No paragraph stops at evidence without interpretation125- [ ] No claim stronger than its source126- [ ] No banned vocabulary or construction from the list above127- [ ] British English throughout, consistently128- [ ] Sentence length genuinely varied129- [ ] Every acronym defined at first use130- [ ] Every table and figure referenced in the text131- [ ] Paragraph form, third person