Cloud Solution Architect

Design well-architected Azure cloud systems — 10 design principles, 6 architecture styles, 44 design patterns, technology choices, WAF pillars

fabioc-aloha Updated Sep 22, 2026

Install

Press C to copy

$ npx skillmds@latest add fabioc-aloha/cloud-solution-architect-4

Installs into ~/.claude/skills (or .claude/skills inside a project). Restart Claude Code to pick it up.

Download SKILL.md

＋ Add to plugin

README badge

[![SkillMD](https://skillmd.com/badge/fabioc-aloha/cloud-solution-architect-4.svg)](https://skillmd.com/skills/fabioc-aloha/cloud-solution-architect-4)

Trust & safety

2 of 3 audits passed

Last audited Sep 23, 2026 · commit 8ea4675

Permissions this skill uses

Makes network calls
The instructions fetch remote URLs or call external services.

Works with: Claude Code Claude.ai OpenAI Codex +

File contents

Cloud Solution Architect

Design well-architected, production-grade cloud systems following Azure Architecture Center best practices

Ten Design Principles for Azure Applications

#	Principle	Key Tactics
1	Design for self-healing	Retry with backoff, circuit breaker, bulkhead isolation, health endpoint monitoring, graceful degradation
2	Make all things redundant	Eliminate single points of failure, use availability zones, deploy multi-region, replicate data
3	Minimize coordination	Decouple services, use async messaging, embrace eventual consistency, use domain events
4	Design to scale out	Horizontal scaling, autoscaling rules, stateless services, avoid session stickiness, partition workloads
5	Partition around limits	Data partitioning (shard/hash/range), respect compute & network limits, use CDNs for static content
6	Design for operations	Structured logging, distributed tracing, metrics & dashboards, runbook automation, infrastructure as code
7	Use managed services	Prefer PaaS over IaaS, reduce operational burden, leverage built-in HA/DR/scaling
8	Use an identity service	Microsoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC, avoid storing credentials, zero-trust principles
9	Design for evolution	Loose coupling, versioned APIs, backward compatibility, async messaging for integration, feature flags
10	Build for business needs	Define SLAs/SLOs, establish RTO/RPO targets, domain-driven design, cost modeling, composite SLAs

Architecture Styles

Style	Description	When to Use	Key Services
N-tier	Horizontal layers (presentation, business, data)	Traditional enterprise apps, lift-and-shift	App Service, SQL Database, VNets
Web-Queue-Worker	Web frontend → message queue → backend worker	Moderate-complexity apps with long-running tasks	App Service, Service Bus, Functions
Microservices	Small autonomous services, bounded contexts, independent deploy	Complex domains, independent team scaling	AKS, Container Apps, API Management
Event-driven	Pub/sub model, event producers/consumers	Real-time processing, IoT, reactive systems	Event Hubs, Event Grid, Functions
Big data	Batch + stream processing pipeline	Analytics, ML pipelines, large-scale data	Synapse, Data Factory, Databricks
Big compute	HPC, parallel processing	Simulations, modeling, rendering, genomics	Batch, CycleCloud, HPC VMs

Selection Criteria

Domain complexity → Microservices (high), N-tier (low-medium)
Team autonomy → Microservices (independent teams), N-tier (single team)
Data volume → Big data (TB+), others (GB)
Latency requirements → Event-driven (real-time), Web-Queue-Worker (tolerant)

Cloud Design Patterns (44 Patterns)

WAF pillar mapping: R=Reliability, S=Security, CO=Cost Optimization, OE=Operational Excellence, PE=Performance Efficiency.

Messaging & Communication

Pattern	Summary	Pillars
Asynchronous Request-Reply	Decouple request/response with polling or callbacks	R, PE
Claim Check	Split large messages; store payload separately, pass reference	R, PE
Choreography	Services coordinate via events without central orchestrator	R, OE
Competing Consumers	Multiple consumers process messages from shared queue concurrently	R, PE
Pipes and Filters	Decompose complex processing into reusable filter stages	R, OE
Priority Queue	Prioritize requests so higher-priority work is processed first	R, PE
Publisher/Subscriber	Decouple senders from receivers via topics/subscriptions	R, PE
Queue-Based Load Leveling	Buffer requests with a queue to smooth intermittent loads	R, PE
Sequential Convoy	Process related messages in order while allowing parallel groups	R, PE

Reliability & Resilience

Pattern	Summary	Pillars
Bulkhead	Isolate resources per workload to prevent cascading failure	R
Circuit Breaker	Stop calling a failing service; fail fast to protect resources	R
Compensating Transaction	Undo previously committed steps when a later step fails	R
Health Endpoint Monitoring	Expose health checks for load balancers and orchestrators	R, OE
Leader Election	Coordinate distributed instances by electing a leader	R
Retry	Handle transient faults by retrying with exponential backoff	R
Saga	Manage data consistency across microservices with compensating transactions	R
Scheduler Agent Supervisor	Coordinate distributed actions with retry and failure handling	R

Data Management

Pattern	Summary	Pillars
Cache-Aside	Load data on demand into cache from data store	PE
CQRS	Separate read and write models for independent scaling	PE, R
Event Sourcing	Store state as append-only sequence of domain events	R, OE
Index Table	Create indexes over frequently queried fields in data stores	PE
Materialized View	Pre-compute views over data for efficient queries	PE
Sharding	Distribute data across partitions for scale and performance	PE, R
Static Content Hosting	Serve static content from cloud storage/CDN directly	PE, CO
Valet Key	Grant clients limited direct access to storage resources	S, PE

Design & Structure

Pattern	Summary	Pillars
Ambassador	Offload cross-cutting concerns to a helper sidecar proxy	OE
Anti-Corruption Layer	Translate between new and legacy system models	OE, R
Backends for Frontends	Create separate backends per frontend type (mobile, web, etc.)	OE, PE
Compute Resource Consolidation	Combine multiple workloads into fewer compute instances	CO
External Configuration Store	Externalize configuration from deployment packages	OE
Sidecar	Deploy helper components alongside the main service	OE
Strangler Fig	Incrementally migrate legacy systems by replacing pieces	OE, R

Security & Access

Pattern	Summary	Pillars
Federated Identity	Delegate authentication to an external identity provider	S
Gatekeeper	Protect services using a dedicated broker that validates requests	S
Quarantine	Isolate and validate external assets before allowing use	S
Rate Limiting	Control consumption rate of resources by consumers	R, S
Throttling	Control resource consumption to sustain SLAs under load	R, PE

Deployment & Scaling

Pattern	Summary	Pillars
Deployment Stamps	Deploy multiple independent copies of application components	R, PE
Gateway Aggregation	Aggregate multiple backend calls into a single client request	PE
Gateway Offloading	Offload shared functionality (SSL, auth) to a gateway	OE, S
Gateway Routing	Route requests to multiple backends using a single endpoint	OE
Geode	Deploy backends to multiple regions for active-active serving	R, PE

Technology Choices

Decision Framework

For each technology area, evaluate: requirements → constraints → tradeoffs → select.

Area	Key Options	Selection Criteria
Compute	App Service, Functions, Container Apps, AKS, VMs, Batch	Hosting model, scaling, cost, team skills
Storage	Blob Storage, Data Lake, Files, Disks, Managed Lustre	Access patterns, throughput, cost tier
Data stores	SQL Database, Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL, Redis, Table Storage	Consistency model, query patterns, scale
Messaging	Service Bus, Event Hubs, Event Grid, Queue Storage	Ordering, throughput, pub/sub vs queue
Networking	Front Door, Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Traffic Manager	Global vs regional, L4 vs L7, WAF
AI services	Azure OpenAI, AI Search, AI Foundry, Document Intelligence	Model needs, data grounding, orchestration
Containers	Container Apps, AKS, Container Instances	Operational control vs simplicity

Well-Architected Framework (WAF) Pillars

Pillar	Focus	Key Questions
Reliability	Resiliency, availability, disaster recovery	What is the RTO/RPO? How does it handle failures? Is there redundancy?
Security	Threat protection, identity, data protection	Is identity managed? Is data encrypted? Are there network controls?
Cost Optimization	Cost management, efficiency, right-sizing	Is compute right-sized? Are there reserved instances? Is there waste?
Operational Excellence	Monitoring, deployment, automation	Is deployment automated? Is there observability? Are there runbooks?
Performance Efficiency	Scaling, load testing, performance targets	Can it scale horizontally? Are there performance baselines? Is caching used?

WAF Tradeoff Matrix

Optimizing for...	May impact...
Reliability (redundancy)	Cost (more resources)
Security (isolation)	Performance (added latency)
Cost (consolidation)	Reliability (shared failure domains)
Performance (caching)	Cost (cache infrastructure), Reliability (stale data)

Performance Antipatterns

Antipattern	Problem	Fix
Busy Database	Offloading too much processing to the database	Move logic to application tier, use caching
Busy Front End	Resource-intensive work on frontend request threads	Offload to background workers/queues
Chatty I/O	Many small I/O requests instead of fewer large ones	Batch requests, use bulk APIs, buffer writes
Extraneous Fetching	Retrieving more data than needed	Project only required fields, paginate, filter server-side
Improper Instantiation	Recreating expensive objects per request	Use singletons, connection pooling, HttpClientFactory
Monolithic Persistence	Single data store for all data types	Polyglot persistence — right store for each workload
No Caching	Repeatedly fetching unchanged data	Cache-aside pattern, CDN, output caching, Redis
Noisy Neighbor	One tenant consuming all shared resources	Bulkhead isolation, per-tenant quotas, throttling
Retry Storm	Aggressive retries overwhelming a recovering service	Exponential backoff + jitter, circuit breaker, retry budgets
Synchronous I/O	Blocking threads on I/O operations	Async/await, non-blocking I/O, reactive streams

Mission-Critical Design (99.99%+ SLO)

Design Area	Key Considerations
Application platform	Multi-region active-active, availability zones, Container Apps or AKS with zone redundancy
Application design	Stateless services, idempotent operations, graceful degradation, bulkhead isolation
Networking	Azure Front Door (global LB), DDoS Protection, private endpoints, redundant connectivity
Data platform	Multi-region Cosmos DB, zone-redundant SQL, async replication, conflict resolution
Deployment & testing	Blue-green deployments, canary releases, chaos engineering, automated rollback
Health modeling	Composite health scores, dependency health tracking, automated remediation, SLI dashboards
Security	Zero-trust, managed identity everywhere, key rotation, WAF policies, threat modeling
Operational procedures	Automated runbooks, incident response playbooks, game days, postmortems

Architecture Review Workflow

Step 1: Identify Requirements

Functional: What must the system do?
Non-functional:
  - Availability target (e.g., 99.9%, 99.99%)
  - Latency requirements (p50, p95, p99)
  - Throughput (requests/sec, messages/sec)
  - Data residency and compliance
  - Recovery targets (RTO, RPO)
  - Cost constraints

Step 2: Select Architecture Style

Match requirements to architecture style using the selection criteria table above.

Step 3: Choose Technology Stack

Use the technology choices decision framework. Prefer managed services (PaaS) over IaaS.

Step 4: Apply Design Patterns

Select relevant patterns from the 44 cloud design patterns based on identified concerns.

Step 5: Address Cross-Cutting Concerns

Identity & access — Microsoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC
Monitoring — Application Insights, Azure Monitor, Log Analytics
Security — Network segmentation, encryption at rest/in transit, Key Vault
CI/CD — GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps Pipelines, infrastructure as code

Step 6: Validate Against WAF Pillars

Review each pillar systematically. Document tradeoffs explicitly.

Step 7: Document Decisions

Use Architecture Decision Records (ADRs):

# ADR-NNN: [Decision Title]

## Status: [Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated]

## Context
[What is the issue we're addressing?]

## Decision
[What did we decide and why?]

## Consequences
[What are the positive and negative impacts?]

Related Skills

This skill complements:

azure-architecture-patterns — Detailed Azure-specific patterns
bicep-avm-mastery — Infrastructure as code for Azure
security-review — STRIDE, threat modeling
observability-monitoring — Production visibility

References

---name: cloud-solution-architect-4description: Design well-architected Azure cloud systems — 10 design principles, 6 architecture styles, 44 design patterns, technology choices, WAF pillars---# Cloud Solution Architect> Design well-architected, production-grade cloud systems following Azure Architecture Center best practices---## Ten Design Principles for Azure Applications| # | Principle | Key Tactics ||---|-----------|-------------|| 1 | **Design for self-healing** | Retry with backoff, circuit breaker, bulkhead isolation, health endpoint monitoring, graceful degradation || 2 | **Make all things redundant** | Eliminate single points of failure, use availability zones, deploy multi-region, replicate data || 3 | **Minimize coordination** | Decouple services, use async messaging, embrace eventual consistency, use domain events || 4 | **Design to scale out** | Horizontal scaling, autoscaling rules, stateless services, avoid session stickiness, partition workloads || 5 | **Partition around limits** | Data partitioning (shard/hash/range), respect compute & network limits, use CDNs for static content || 6 | **Design for operations** | Structured logging, distributed tracing, metrics & dashboards, runbook automation, infrastructure as code || 7 | **Use managed services** | Prefer PaaS over IaaS, reduce operational burden, leverage built-in HA/DR/scaling || 8 | **Use an identity service** | Microsoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC, avoid storing credentials, zero-trust principles || 9 | **Design for evolution** | Loose coupling, versioned APIs, backward compatibility, async messaging for integration, feature flags || 10 | **Build for business needs** | Define SLAs/SLOs, establish RTO/RPO targets, domain-driven design, cost modeling, composite SLAs |---## Architecture Styles| Style | Description | When to Use | Key Services ||-------|-------------|-------------|--------------|| **N-tier** | Horizontal layers (presentation, business, data) | Traditional enterprise apps, lift-and-shift | App Service, SQL Database, VNets || **Web-Queue-Worker** | Web frontend → message queue → backend worker | Moderate-complexity apps with long-running tasks | App Service, Service Bus, Functions || **Microservices** | Small autonomous services, bounded contexts, independent deploy | Complex domains, independent team scaling | AKS, Container Apps, API Management || **Event-driven** | Pub/sub model, event producers/consumers | Real-time processing, IoT, reactive systems | Event Hubs, Event Grid, Functions || **Big data** | Batch + stream processing pipeline | Analytics, ML pipelines, large-scale data | Synapse, Data Factory, Databricks || **Big compute** | HPC, parallel processing | Simulations, modeling, rendering, genomics | Batch, CycleCloud, HPC VMs |### Selection Criteria- **Domain complexity** → Microservices (high), N-tier (low-medium)- **Team autonomy** → Microservices (independent teams), N-tier (single team)- **Data volume** → Big data (TB+), others (GB)- **Latency requirements** → Event-driven (real-time), Web-Queue-Worker (tolerant)---## Cloud Design Patterns (44 Patterns)WAF pillar mapping: **R**=Reliability, **S**=Security, **CO**=Cost Optimization, **OE**=Operational Excellence, **PE**=Performance Efficiency.### Messaging & Communication| Pattern | Summary | Pillars ||---------|---------|---------|| **Asynchronous Request-Reply** | Decouple request/response with polling or callbacks | R, PE || **Claim Check** | Split large messages; store payload separately, pass reference | R, PE || **Choreography** | Services coordinate via events without central orchestrator | R, OE || **Competing Consumers** | Multiple consumers process messages from shared queue concurrently | R, PE || **Pipes and Filters** | Decompose complex processing into reusable filter stages | R, OE || **Priority Queue** | Prioritize requests so higher-priority work is processed first | R, PE || **Publisher/Subscriber** | Decouple senders from receivers via topics/subscriptions | R, PE || **Queue-Based Load Leveling** | Buffer requests with a queue to smooth intermittent loads | R, PE || **Sequential Convoy** | Process related messages in order while allowing parallel groups | R, PE |### Reliability & Resilience| Pattern | Summary | Pillars ||---------|---------|---------|| **Bulkhead** | Isolate resources per workload to prevent cascading failure | R || **Circuit Breaker** | Stop calling a failing service; fail fast to protect resources | R || **Compensating Transaction** | Undo previously committed steps when a later step fails | R || **Health Endpoint Monitoring** | Expose health checks for load balancers and orchestrators | R, OE || **Leader Election** | Coordinate distributed instances by electing a leader | R || **Retry** | Handle transient faults by retrying with exponential backoff | R || **Saga** | Manage data consistency across microservices with compensating transactions | R || **Scheduler Agent Supervisor** | Coordinate distributed actions with retry and failure handling | R |### Data Management| Pattern | Summary | Pillars ||---------|---------|---------|| **Cache-Aside** | Load data on demand into cache from data store | PE || **CQRS** | Separate read and write models for independent scaling | PE, R || **Event Sourcing** | Store state as append-only sequence of domain events | R, OE || **Index Table** | Create indexes over frequently queried fields in data stores | PE || **Materialized View** | Pre-compute views over data for efficient queries | PE || **Sharding** | Distribute data across partitions for scale and performance | PE, R || **Static Content Hosting** | Serve static content from cloud storage/CDN directly | PE, CO || **Valet Key** | Grant clients limited direct access to storage resources | S, PE |### Design & Structure| Pattern | Summary | Pillars ||---------|---------|---------|| **Ambassador** | Offload cross-cutting concerns to a helper sidecar proxy | OE || **Anti-Corruption Layer** | Translate between new and legacy system models | OE, R || **Backends for Frontends** | Create separate backends per frontend type (mobile, web, etc.) | OE, PE || **Compute Resource Consolidation** | Combine multiple workloads into fewer compute instances | CO || **External Configuration Store** | Externalize configuration from deployment packages | OE || **Sidecar** | Deploy helper components alongside the main service | OE || **Strangler Fig** | Incrementally migrate legacy systems by replacing pieces | OE, R |### Security & Access| Pattern | Summary | Pillars ||---------|---------|---------|| **Federated Identity** | Delegate authentication to an external identity provider | S || **Gatekeeper** | Protect services using a dedicated broker that validates requests | S || **Quarantine** | Isolate and validate external assets before allowing use | S || **Rate Limiting** | Control consumption rate of resources by consumers | R, S || **Throttling** | Control resource consumption to sustain SLAs under load | R, PE |### Deployment & Scaling| Pattern | Summary | Pillars ||---------|---------|---------|| **Deployment Stamps** | Deploy multiple independent copies of application components | R, PE || **Gateway Aggregation** | Aggregate multiple backend calls into a single client request | PE || **Gateway Offloading** | Offload shared functionality (SSL, auth) to a gateway | OE, S || **Gateway Routing** | Route requests to multiple backends using a single endpoint | OE || **Geode** | Deploy backends to multiple regions for active-active serving | R, PE |---## Technology Choices### Decision FrameworkFor each technology area, evaluate: **requirements → constraints → tradeoffs → select**.| Area | Key Options | Selection Criteria ||------|-------------|-------------------|| **Compute** | App Service, Functions, Container Apps, AKS, VMs, Batch | Hosting model, scaling, cost, team skills || **Storage** | Blob Storage, Data Lake, Files, Disks, Managed Lustre | Access patterns, throughput, cost tier || **Data stores** | SQL Database, Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL, Redis, Table Storage | Consistency model, query patterns, scale || **Messaging** | Service Bus, Event Hubs, Event Grid, Queue Storage | Ordering, throughput, pub/sub vs queue || **Networking** | Front Door, Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Traffic Manager | Global vs regional, L4 vs L7, WAF || **AI services** | Azure OpenAI, AI Search, AI Foundry, Document Intelligence | Model needs, data grounding, orchestration || **Containers** | Container Apps, AKS, Container Instances | Operational control vs simplicity |---## Well-Architected Framework (WAF) Pillars| Pillar | Focus | Key Questions ||--------|-------|---------------|| **Reliability** | Resiliency, availability, disaster recovery | What is the RTO/RPO? How does it handle failures? Is there redundancy? || **Security** | Threat protection, identity, data protection | Is identity managed? Is data encrypted? Are there network controls? || **Cost Optimization** | Cost management, efficiency, right-sizing | Is compute right-sized? Are there reserved instances? Is there waste? || **Operational Excellence** | Monitoring, deployment, automation | Is deployment automated? Is there observability? Are there runbooks? || **Performance Efficiency** | Scaling, load testing, performance targets | Can it scale horizontally? Are there performance baselines? Is caching used? |### WAF Tradeoff Matrix| Optimizing for... | May impact... ||-------------------|---------------|| Reliability (redundancy) | Cost (more resources) || Security (isolation) | Performance (added latency) || Cost (consolidation) | Reliability (shared failure domains) || Performance (caching) | Cost (cache infrastructure), Reliability (stale data) |---## Performance Antipatterns| Antipattern | Problem | Fix ||-------------|---------|-----|| **Busy Database** | Offloading too much processing to the database | Move logic to application tier, use caching || **Busy Front End** | Resource-intensive work on frontend request threads | Offload to background workers/queues || **Chatty I/O** | Many small I/O requests instead of fewer large ones | Batch requests, use bulk APIs, buffer writes || **Extraneous Fetching** | Retrieving more data than needed | Project only required fields, paginate, filter server-side || **Improper Instantiation** | Recreating expensive objects per request | Use singletons, connection pooling, HttpClientFactory || **Monolithic Persistence** | Single data store for all data types | Polyglot persistence — right store for each workload || **No Caching** | Repeatedly fetching unchanged data | Cache-aside pattern, CDN, output caching, Redis || **Noisy Neighbor** | One tenant consuming all shared resources | Bulkhead isolation, per-tenant quotas, throttling || **Retry Storm** | Aggressive retries overwhelming a recovering service | Exponential backoff + jitter, circuit breaker, retry budgets || **Synchronous I/O** | Blocking threads on I/O operations | Async/await, non-blocking I/O, reactive streams |---## Mission-Critical Design (99.99%+ SLO)| Design Area | Key Considerations ||-------------|-------------------|| **Application platform** | Multi-region active-active, availability zones, Container Apps or AKS with zone redundancy || **Application design** | Stateless services, idempotent operations, graceful degradation, bulkhead isolation || **Networking** | Azure Front Door (global LB), DDoS Protection, private endpoints, redundant connectivity || **Data platform** | Multi-region Cosmos DB, zone-redundant SQL, async replication, conflict resolution || **Deployment & testing** | Blue-green deployments, canary releases, chaos engineering, automated rollback || **Health modeling** | Composite health scores, dependency health tracking, automated remediation, SLI dashboards || **Security** | Zero-trust, managed identity everywhere, key rotation, WAF policies, threat modeling || **Operational procedures** | Automated runbooks, incident response playbooks, game days, postmortems |---## Architecture Review Workflow### Step 1: Identify Requirements```textFunctional: What must the system do?Non-functional: - Availability target (e.g., 99.9%, 99.99%) - Latency requirements (p50, p95, p99) - Throughput (requests/sec, messages/sec) - Data residency and compliance - Recovery targets (RTO, RPO) - Cost constraints```### Step 2: Select Architecture StyleMatch requirements to architecture style using the selection criteria table above.### Step 3: Choose Technology StackUse the technology choices decision framework. Prefer managed services (PaaS) over IaaS.### Step 4: Apply Design PatternsSelect relevant patterns from the 44 cloud design patterns based on identified concerns.### Step 5: Address Cross-Cutting Concerns- **Identity & access** — Microsoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC- **Monitoring** — Application Insights, Azure Monitor, Log Analytics- **Security** — Network segmentation, encryption at rest/in transit, Key Vault- **CI/CD** — GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps Pipelines, infrastructure as code### Step 6: Validate Against WAF PillarsReview each pillar systematically. Document tradeoffs explicitly.### Step 7: Document DecisionsUse Architecture Decision Records (ADRs):```markdown# ADR-NNN: [Decision Title]## Status: [Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated]## Context[What is the issue we're addressing?]## Decision[What did we decide and why?]## Consequences[What are the positive and negative impacts?]```---## Related SkillsThis skill complements:- **azure-architecture-patterns** — Detailed Azure-specific patterns- **bicep-avm-mastery** — Infrastructure as code for Azure- **security-review** — STRIDE, threat modeling- **observability-monitoring** — Production visibility---## References- [Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/)- [Well-Architected Framework](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/)- [Cloud Design Patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)- [Mission-Critical Workloads](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/mission-critical/)

fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecture/tree/main/platforms/vscode-extension/vsix-inspect/extension/brain-files/skills/cloud-solution-architect commit 8ea4675f96

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add fabioc-aloha/cloud-solution-architect-4