Blind Spot Advisor
Source: Atlas UX Proactive Advisor pattern, adapted for K3 Agentic Infrastructure Version: 1.0 Trigger: Run AFTER an implementation plan is drafted, BEFORE execution begins
Purpose
GAG executes what's asked. This skill checks what's NOT being asked. It surfaces blind spots across five domains: compliance, conversion, trust, retention, and competitive positioning.
Execution Protocol
Step 1: Ingest the Plan
Read the implementation plan or feature spec that was just drafted. Identify:
- What is being built
- Who the target user is
- What data flows are involved
- What external services are touched
- What the deployment target is
Step 2: Run the Blind Spot Checklist
Evaluate the plan against EVERY item below. For each category, output findings only if a blind spot exists. Skip categories with no findings.
Blind Spot Checklists
🔴 Compliance & Legal
- Data Privacy (GDPR/CCPA): Does the feature collect, store, or process PII? Is consent captured and revocable?
- Industry Licensing: Does the feature involve activities that require professional licensure in the target jurisdiction?
- Advertising Rules: Does any AI-generated content constitute advertising? Are required disclosures present?
- Data Redistribution: Does the feature use third-party data (APIs, feeds)? Are redistribution terms verified?
- Accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA): Does the feature meet minimum accessibility requirements?
- Professional Credentials: Are any professional credentials, certifications, or qualifications accurately and compliantly represented?
- CAN-SPAM / Commercial Email: Does the feature send unsolicited commercial messages?
- Terms of Service: Does the feature comply with third-party platform ToS (APIs, embeds, data providers)?
🟢 Conversion & UX
- CTA Clarity: Is there a clear next step on every page/screen?
- Mobile Experience: Has mobile been tested? Is touch target size ≥ 44px?
- Page Speed: Will this addition push LCP above 2.5s?
- Form Friction: Are forms asking for more data than needed at this stage?
- Social Proof: Is there visible trust evidence (reviews, credentials, case studies)?
🔵 Retention & Engagement
- Notification Strategy: Will users know when to come back?
- Value Frequency: Does this feature create a reason to return weekly?
- Onboarding Gap: Can a new user understand this without a tutorial?
- Churn Signals: Are we tracking drop-off points?
⚪ Competitive & Strategic
- Differentiation: Does this exist on competing realtor sites? If so, what's our edge?
- Defensibility: Can this be copied in a weekend?
- Platform Risk: Are we building on a third-party that could change terms?
- Scaling Assumptions: Does this work at 10x current volume?
Output Format
# Blind Spot Advisory — [Plan/Feature Name]
**Reviewed:** [Date]
**Plan Source:** [Link to implementation_plan.md or feature spec]
## 🔴 CRITICAL (Must Address Before Execution)
- [Finding with specific regulatory citation or risk]
## 🟡 HIGH (Should Address Before Launch)
- [Finding with impact assessment]
## 🟢 MEDIUM (Consider for V2)
- [Finding with recommendation]
## 💡 Ideas to Consider
- [Opportunities or enhancements the plan didn't mention]
## ✋ What NOT to Build Yet
- [Features that seem tempting but are premature given current stage]
When to Invoke
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| Implementation plan drafted | Run full checklist |
| Feature spec written | Run full checklist |
| PR touches auth, payments, or legal content | Run Compliance section only |
| Jules Day Batch task submitted | Run Compliance + Trust sections |
| Quarterly review | Run full checklist against each active feature |
Integration with Action-Gating Loop
This skill maps to Step 2 (VERIFY) and Step 3 (SGL GATE) of the Action-Gating Loop. Findings rated 🔴 CRITICAL should trigger an SGL REVIEW or BLOCK before execution proceeds.