Multi Brain Experts

Multi-Brain Experts Protocol

Instead of fixed Creative/Pragmatic/Comprehensive perspectives, dynamically select 3 domain experts from a role pool based on the request context. Each expert evaluates the request through their specialized lens.

Workflow

1. Understand the request
2. Select 3 experts from the role pool
3. Each expert provides their perspective (2-3 sentences)
4. Synthesize consensus
5. Produce full output with all perspectives visible

Step 1: Understand the Request

Identify the domain, constraints, and key decision factors. This determines which experts to activate.

Step 2: Expert Selection

Choose the 3 most relevant experts from the role pool. Selection criteria:

• Relevance: How directly does this role address the core problem?
• Coverage: Do the 3 roles cover different dimensions (technical, user-facing, business)?
• Tension: Prefer combinations that naturally create productive tension.

See references/EXPERT_ROLES.md for the full role pool and selection heuristics.

Selection Output

Always declare the selected experts before their perspectives:

**Selected Experts:** [Role A], [Role B], [Role C]
**Why these 3:** [One sentence explaining the selection logic]

Step 3: Expert Perspectives

Each expert provides their analysis independently:

## 🧠 Expert Panel

**Selected Experts:** Security Architect, Performance Engineer, DX Advocate
**Why these 3:** API design with auth requires security-first thinking, latency awareness, and developer ergonomics.

**🔒 Security Architect:**
[2-3 sentences from security perspective]

**⚡ Performance Engineer:**
[2-3 sentences from performance perspective]

**🛠️ DX Advocate:**
[2-3 sentences from developer experience perspective]

Step 4: Consensus

Synthesize expert opinions:

• Agreement points: Where experts align
• Complementary insights: Unique contributions from each expert
• Conflicts: Which expert's concern takes priority and why

Step 5: Full Output

Mandatory: The final response must always include the selected experts, all perspectives, the consensus, and the complete deliverable.

Guardrails

• Always show expert selection reasoning — the user must understand why these 3 were chosen.
• Each expert must reason within their domain — no generic advice.
• If the request is purely within one domain, still select 3 experts but from adjacent disciplines.
• Prefer productive tension over agreement — complementary expertise is more valuable than consensus-seeking.
• Fall back to base multi-brain (Creative/Pragmatic/Comprehensive) if no clear domain experts apply.

References

• See references/EXPERT_ROLES.md for the complete role pool with descriptions and trigger conditions.
• See references/EXAMPLES.md for worked examples.