ferminrp writing-well
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- The user asks to "audit", "review", "improve", "edit", or "rewrite" text.
- The user shares writing and asks for feedback on clarity or impact.
- The user mentions this skill directly (
writing-wellorwriting audit).
Workflow
Run all 7 checks in order. For each finding:
- Quote the exact offending text.
- Explain why it is weak.
- Propose a tighter rewrite.
Check 1: Sentence Length (max 30 words)
Flag sentences longer than 30 words.
Action: Split or tighten so each sentence carries one idea.
Check 2: Clutter Phrases
Replace wordy phrases with simpler forms.
| Cluttered phrase | Replace with |
|---|---|
| with the possible exception of | except |
| due to the fact that | because |
| totally lacked the ability to | could not |
| until such time as | until |
| for the purpose of | for |
| in order to | to |
| it is important to note that | delete or rephrase |
| at the end of the day | delete or rephrase |
| in terms of | rephrase |
| a large number of | many |
| in the event that | if |
| at this point in time | now |
| has the ability to | can |
| on a daily basis | daily |
| the vast majority of | most |
Also flag any phrase where one word can do the same job.
Check 3: Unsupported Adjectives/Adverbs
Flag subjective modifiers without evidence.
Examples:
- "Sales increased significantly in Q4" -> "Unit sales increased 40% in Q4 2024 vs Q4 2023"
- "We made the application much faster" -> "We reduced server-side p90 latency from 10 ms to 1 ms"
- "This will be extremely successful" -> "This will increase output by 2.5%"
Common words to flag: significantly, substantially, greatly, very, extremely, considerably, remarkably, tremendously, much, quite, really, incredibly, fairly, pretty (as adverb), a lot.
Action: Ask for a number; if none is available, remove or soften the claim.
Check 4: Weasel Words
Flag non-committal language: would, might, should, could, arguably, nearly, practically, virtually, somewhat, relatively, potentially.
Action: Replace with a concrete commitment, specific number, or explicit uncertainty ("I don't know yet, and I will follow up").
Check 5: Jargon, Acronyms, Accessibility
- Flag jargon not defined for non-experts.
- Expand acronyms on first use, e.g., "Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)".
Action: Define once, then use the short form.
Check 6: "So What?" Test
For each paragraph, ask if the reader immediately sees relevance.
Action: Add implication, consequence, or numeric impact.
Check 7: Flow and Rhythm
Check whether the text sounds natural when read aloud.
Flag:
- Repeated words/phrases in nearby sentences.
- Clunky sentences that signal unclear thinking.
- Monotonous sentence length/patterns.
- Ideas presented in an unnatural order.
Action: Reorder ideas and vary sentence rhythm to match idea complexity.
Response Format
Use this structure:
## Writing Audit Report
### Summary
[1-2 sentence assessment of strengths and top improvement area]
### Score: X/10
[Score based on how many checks pass cleanly]
### Findings
#### Critical
[Issues that severely hurt clarity or accuracy]
#### Important
[Issues that materially reduce quality]
#### Minor / Polish
[Flow and wording refinements]
### Rewrite Suggestion
[Full rewrite preserving intent and voice]
Direct-Answer Rule
When text asks a question, prefer one of these forms:
- Yes.
- No.
- A number.
- I don't know (and will follow up).
Principles
- Clarity is kindness.
- Data beats adjectives.
- If it sounds wrong, it is probably wrong.
- Keep subject-verb-object unless complexity demands otherwise.
- Respect the reader's time.