Spec Validate

/spec-validate

Frontmatter notes:

• context: fork — validator runs without prior conversation bias (clean evaluation)
• allowed-tools — read-only file access plus narrow Bash allowlist for drift detection commands across Terraform, Kubernetes, Prometheus, and Git. No Write/Edit (validators never modify state).

Two modes:

1. Internal consistency — every requirement has a design element; every design has tasks; tasks are atomic
2. Drift detection — current code/infra state matches what the spec describes

Usage

/spec-validate <feature-name>           # internal consistency
/spec-validate <feature-name> --drift   # drift detection
/spec-validate <feature-name> --all     # both

Prerequisites

• Spec exists in .claude/specs/<feature-name>/
• Subagent spec-validator available
• For --drift: domain tooling installed (terraform, kubectl, promtool, etc.)

Workflow — Internal Consistency

Step 1 — Coverage matrix

For each requirement (R1, R2, ...) in requirements.md:

• Find at least one design element in design.md that addresses it
• Find at least one task in tasks.md that implements it
• Report orphan requirements

For each task in tasks.md:

• Find the design element it implements
• Report orphan tasks (work without justification)

Step 2 — Atomicity check

Each task must:

• Reference specific file paths
• Be completable in one PR-sized change
• Have clear acceptance criteria

Flag tasks that are vague ("set up the thing", "configure stuff") or too large ("implement entire module").

Step 3 — Steering compliance

Cross-check spec against .claude/steering/*.md:

• Tech choices match steering/tech.md (e.g., correct framework versions)
• Naming follows steering/structure.md
• Compliance constraints from steering/product.md are addressed

Step 4 — Report

Spec: payment-vpc-pci

Coverage:
  Requirements: 7 / 7 covered
  Design elements: 12 / 12 have tasks
  Orphan tasks: 0

Atomicity:
  ✓ All 8 tasks reference specific paths
  ✓ All 8 tasks have acceptance criteria

Steering compliance:
  ✓ tech.md: AWS provider ~> 5.0 matches
  ✓ structure.md: naming follows <env>-<region>-<resource>
  ⚠ product.md: PCI requirement requires KMS CMK — not in design.md

Result: 1 warning, 0 errors. Address PCI/KMS in design before proceeding.

Workflow — Drift Detection

Step 1 — Load expected state

Parse tasks.md to extract files/resources that should exist post-implementation.

Step 2 — Compare to actual

Terraform:

terraform plan -refresh-only -no-color > /tmp/drift.txt

Parse output. Any "drift" entries = divergence from last apply. Compare to design.md to determine: was this intentional and not specced, or unauthorized?

Kubernetes:

kubectl get -f manifests/ -o yaml > /tmp/actual.yaml
diff -u manifests/ /tmp/actual.yaml

Observability (Prometheus):

promtool query instant http://prometheus:9090 '<sli-query-from-slo.md>'

Confirm SLI is being measured as defined. Confirm alerts are firing as designed.

Step 3 — Reconciliation report

Drift detected:
  - aws_security_group.allow_ssh: port 22 added (not in spec)
  - aws_iam_role.payment: tag "Owner" missing

Suggested actions:
  1. Update spec (legitimate change): edit design.md, re-approve, add to tasks.md
  2. Revert state (unauthorized change): apply spec to bring back to compliance
  3. Accept drift: append exception to spec with rationale

Integration with CI

/spec-validate --all --format=json returns machine-readable output for CI gates:

# .github/workflows/spec-check.yml
- name: Validate specs
  run: |
    claude /spec-validate $(ls .claude/specs/) --all --format=json | tee report.json
    if jq -e '.errors > 0' report.json; then exit 1; fi

Anti-Patterns

• Do NOT auto-fix drift — always report and let human decide reconciliation
• Do NOT modify spec files during validation — read-only
• Do NOT pass validation on warnings — only "0 errors and 0 warnings" should green-light