Runtime Delegation Safety
Attribution: YourVisionYourCreation LLC —
yourvisionyourcreation.com
Research anchor (verified): Tomašev, Franklin & Osindero,
Intelligent AI Delegation (Google DeepMind, arXiv:2602.11865,
2026) — the source of this library's agentic Tiers 1-4 — which frames
safe delegation across agents and humans and identifies concrete
runtime implementation as an open direction. This skill is
YVYC-original doctrine built to answer that open direction.
Doctrine class: Tier 5 — Frontier (YVYC original, anchored in
verified research)
Universal So-What
Design-time safety review approves delegations in the abstract; runtime
is where they actually happen — with the real inputs, the real
permissions, the real degraded conditions. A delegation approved on the
whiteboard can be catastrophic on Tuesday at 0300 when the context has
shifted, the sub-agent is overloaded, and the fallback is offline. The
doctrine moves the safety check to the moment of delegation itself:
every handoff, every time, checked live.
Core Doctrine
1. The Two-Level Safety Model
Delegation safety operates at two levels, and both must hold:
| Level |
Question |
Checked |
| Design level |
Is this KIND of delegation permitted between these KINDS of agents? |
Once, at architecture time |
| Runtime level |
Is THIS delegation safe RIGHT NOW — this task, this delegatee, this state? |
Every delegation act |
The historical failure of multi-agent safety is doing only the first
level and calling it done. Design approval is a hunting license, not
a kill authorization.
2. The Runtime Gate — Five Checks Per Delegation Act
Before any task transfers, the delegating agent verifies:
- Capability check: the delegatee's declared capabilities cover
THIS task's actual requirements — not the task category's typical
requirements
- Authority check: the delegator holds the authority it is
transferring; nothing delegates permissions it does not itself
possess
- State check: the delegatee's current condition supports the
task — load, error rate, resource budget; a qualified agent in a
degraded state is not qualified right now
- Boundary check: the task, executed as specified, stays within
the delegator's OWN operating boundaries — delegation never
launders a forbidden action into permitted-by-distance
- Recovery check: a failure path exists — what happens, and who
acts, if the delegatee fails, stalls, or returns garbage
A delegation that cannot pass all five does not execute. It escalates.
3. Authority Transfer Is Explicit and Bounded
- Every delegation states what authority travels with the task: which
actions, over which resources, until when
- Authority transfers are time-bounded and task-bounded by default —
open-ended grants are the exception, justified in writing
- The delegator RETAINS accountability for the delegation decision
even as responsibility for execution transfers — delegation is
never accountability laundering (this extends the
accountability-chain doctrine of Tier 3)
4. Accountability Propagation on Failure
When a delegated task fails:
- The failure is attributed at the correct point in the chain: a bad
delegation decision, a bad execution, or a bad specification — each
is a different defect owned by a different party (see
agent-error-attribution for the forensics)
- Attribution propagates: a sub-agent's failure caused by the
delegator's impossible specification lands on the delegator
- The failure record includes the runtime gate's state at delegation
time — the five checks, as they evaluated — so the review can
distinguish "gate failed to catch it" from "gate was bypassed"
5. Human Retention Rules
Certain delegations never fully transfer to autonomous chains:
- Irreversible actions, safety-critical operations, and decisions
with legal or reputational weight retain a human decision point —
the runtime gate ROUTES to a human rather than approving
autonomously
- The retention list is written at design time and enforced at
runtime — an autonomous chain discovering mid-mission that it
should have asked a human has already failed
- Degraded-mode rule: when monitoring, logging, or recovery
infrastructure is impaired, the delegation threshold RISES —
systems delegate less freely precisely when visibility drops
6. The Delegation Ledger
- Every runtime delegation is logged: task, delegator, delegatee,
authority transferred, gate results, outcome
- The ledger is the system's memory of what delegation patterns
actually succeed — feeding trust calibration (Tier 1) with evidence
instead of assumption
- Ledger review runs on a cadence: delegation patterns that
consistently pass the gate and fail in execution indicate a gate
check that measures the wrong thing — the gate itself is versioned
and improved
Common Failure Modes
| Failure |
Cause |
Correction |
| "Approved" delegation fails catastrophically |
Design-time approval treated as runtime clearance |
The runtime gate — five checks per act |
| Forbidden action executed via sub-agent |
No boundary check |
Delegation never launders prohibitions |
| Qualified agent fails while overloaded |
Capability checked, state ignored |
State check — qualified means qualified NOW |
| Failure blame lands on the last agent |
No accountability propagation |
Attribution at the correct chain point |
| Autonomous chain makes an irreversible call |
Retention list absent or unenforced |
Human decision points routed at runtime |
| Same delegation pattern fails monthly |
No ledger review |
Gate versioned against evidence |
Non-Negotiables
- Every delegation act passes the five-check runtime gate.
- No agent delegates authority it does not hold.
- Delegation never converts a forbidden action into a permitted one.
- Accountability propagates to the correct point in the chain.
- The human retention list is enforced at runtime, not remembered
at review.
- Every delegation lands in the ledger.
Built by YourVisionYourCreation LLC — yourvisionyourcreation.com
Research foundation credited above. Licensed under CC BY 4.0
1---2name: runtime-delegation-safety3description: Activate whenever AI agents delegate tasks to other agents or humans DURING execution — runtime task handoffs, dynamic sub-agent spawning, mid-mission authority transfer, or any multi-agent system where delegation decisions happen live rather than at design time. Trigger on designing delegation safety checks, reviewing multi-agent systems for runtime failures, or any incident where a delegated task went wrong and nobody can say which safeguard should have caught it. Fire because design-time safety review cannot see runtime conditions — the delegation that was safe on the whiteboard executes in a world the whiteboard never met.4license: CC BY 4.05---67# Runtime Delegation Safety89**Attribution:** YourVisionYourCreation LLC —10yourvisionyourcreation.com11**Research anchor (verified):** Tomašev, Franklin & Osindero,12*Intelligent AI Delegation* (Google DeepMind, arXiv:2602.11865,132026) — the source of this library's agentic Tiers 1-4 — which frames14safe delegation across agents and humans and identifies concrete15runtime implementation as an open direction. This skill is16YVYC-original doctrine built to answer that open direction.17**Doctrine class:** Tier 5 — Frontier (YVYC original, anchored in18verified research)1920---2122## Universal So-What2324Design-time safety review approves delegations in the abstract; runtime25is where they actually happen — with the real inputs, the real26permissions, the real degraded conditions. A delegation approved on the27whiteboard can be catastrophic on Tuesday at 0300 when the context has28shifted, the sub-agent is overloaded, and the fallback is offline. The29doctrine moves the safety check to the moment of delegation itself:30every handoff, every time, checked live.3132---3334## Core Doctrine3536### 1. The Two-Level Safety Model3738Delegation safety operates at two levels, and both must hold:3940| Level | Question | Checked |41|---|---|---|42| **Design level** | Is this KIND of delegation permitted between these KINDS of agents? | Once, at architecture time |43| **Runtime level** | Is THIS delegation safe RIGHT NOW — this task, this delegatee, this state? | Every delegation act |4445The historical failure of multi-agent safety is doing only the first46level and calling it done. Design approval is a hunting license, not47a kill authorization.4849### 2. The Runtime Gate — Five Checks Per Delegation Act5051Before any task transfers, the delegating agent verifies:52531. **Capability check:** the delegatee's declared capabilities cover54 THIS task's actual requirements — not the task category's typical55 requirements562. **Authority check:** the delegator holds the authority it is57 transferring; nothing delegates permissions it does not itself58 possess593. **State check:** the delegatee's current condition supports the60 task — load, error rate, resource budget; a qualified agent in a61 degraded state is not qualified right now624. **Boundary check:** the task, executed as specified, stays within63 the delegator's OWN operating boundaries — delegation never64 launders a forbidden action into permitted-by-distance655. **Recovery check:** a failure path exists — what happens, and who66 acts, if the delegatee fails, stalls, or returns garbage6768A delegation that cannot pass all five does not execute. It escalates.6970### 3. Authority Transfer Is Explicit and Bounded7172- Every delegation states what authority travels with the task: which73 actions, over which resources, until when74- Authority transfers are time-bounded and task-bounded by default —75 open-ended grants are the exception, justified in writing76- The delegator RETAINS accountability for the delegation decision77 even as responsibility for execution transfers — delegation is78 never accountability laundering (this extends the79 accountability-chain doctrine of Tier 3)8081### 4. Accountability Propagation on Failure8283When a delegated task fails:8485- The failure is attributed at the correct point in the chain: a bad86 delegation decision, a bad execution, or a bad specification — each87 is a different defect owned by a different party (see88 agent-error-attribution for the forensics)89- Attribution propagates: a sub-agent's failure caused by the90 delegator's impossible specification lands on the delegator91- The failure record includes the runtime gate's state at delegation92 time — the five checks, as they evaluated — so the review can93 distinguish "gate failed to catch it" from "gate was bypassed"9495### 5. Human Retention Rules9697Certain delegations never fully transfer to autonomous chains:9899- Irreversible actions, safety-critical operations, and decisions100 with legal or reputational weight retain a human decision point —101 the runtime gate ROUTES to a human rather than approving102 autonomously103- The retention list is written at design time and enforced at104 runtime — an autonomous chain discovering mid-mission that it105 should have asked a human has already failed106- Degraded-mode rule: when monitoring, logging, or recovery107 infrastructure is impaired, the delegation threshold RISES —108 systems delegate less freely precisely when visibility drops109110### 6. The Delegation Ledger111112- Every runtime delegation is logged: task, delegator, delegatee,113 authority transferred, gate results, outcome114- The ledger is the system's memory of what delegation patterns115 actually succeed — feeding trust calibration (Tier 1) with evidence116 instead of assumption117- Ledger review runs on a cadence: delegation patterns that118 consistently pass the gate and fail in execution indicate a gate119 check that measures the wrong thing — the gate itself is versioned120 and improved121122---123124## Common Failure Modes125126| Failure | Cause | Correction |127|---|---|---|128| "Approved" delegation fails catastrophically | Design-time approval treated as runtime clearance | The runtime gate — five checks per act |129| Forbidden action executed via sub-agent | No boundary check | Delegation never launders prohibitions |130| Qualified agent fails while overloaded | Capability checked, state ignored | State check — qualified means qualified NOW |131| Failure blame lands on the last agent | No accountability propagation | Attribution at the correct chain point |132| Autonomous chain makes an irreversible call | Retention list absent or unenforced | Human decision points routed at runtime |133| Same delegation pattern fails monthly | No ledger review | Gate versioned against evidence |134135---136137## Non-Negotiables1381391. Every delegation act passes the five-check runtime gate.1402. No agent delegates authority it does not hold.1413. Delegation never converts a forbidden action into a permitted one.1424. Accountability propagates to the correct point in the chain.1435. The human retention list is enforced at runtime, not remembered144 at review.1456. Every delegation lands in the ledger.146147---148149*Built by YourVisionYourCreation LLC — yourvisionyourcreation.com*150*Research foundation credited above. Licensed under CC BY 4.0*