Customer Research
When to Use
Use this skill when you need when the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build...
You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.
Two Modes of Research
Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets
You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.
Mode 2: Go Find Research
You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.
Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.
Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets
Asset Types
Customer interview / sales call transcripts
- Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
- Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them
Survey results
- Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
- Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
- Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal
Customer support conversations
- Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
- Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
- Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches
Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes
- Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
- Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
- Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes
NPS responses
- Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
- Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment
Extraction Framework
For each asset, extract:
Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?
- Functional job: the task itself
- Emotional job: how they want to feel
- Social job: how they want to be perceived
Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?
- Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language
Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?
- Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something
Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?
- Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases
Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use
- This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"
Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?
- Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally
Synthesis Steps
After extracting from individual assets:
- Cluster by theme — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
- Frequency + intensity scoring — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
- Segment by customer profile — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
- Identify the "money quotes" — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
- Flag contradictions — where do customers say one thing but do another?
Research Quality Guardrails
Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:
| Confidence |
Criteria |
| High |
Theme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments |
| Medium |
Theme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment |
| Low |
Single source; could be an outlier; needs validation |
Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.
Sample bias checks:
- Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
- Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
- Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
- Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"
Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.
Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research
Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.
Where to Look
Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.
| ICP Type |
Primary Sources |
| B2B SaaS / technical buyers |
Reddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro |
| SMB / founders |
Reddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro |
| Developer / DevOps |
r/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers |
| B2C / consumer |
App store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments |
| Enterprise |
LinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro |
Quick decision guide:
- Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
- Need to know where your audience spends time? → SparkToro (reveals podcasts, YouTube, subreddits, websites, social accounts)
- Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
- Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
- Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions; SparkToro competitor audience analysis
What to Extract from Each Source
For every piece of content you find:
| Field |
What to Capture |
| Source |
Platform, thread URL, date |
| Verbatim quote |
Exact words — don't paraphrase |
| Context |
What prompted the comment? |
| Sentiment |
Positive / negative / neutral / frustrated |
| Theme tag |
Pain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language |
| Customer profile signals |
Role, company size, industry hints from the post |
Research Synthesis Template
After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:
## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)
### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning
### Theme 2: ...
Persona Generation
Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.
Persona Structure
## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]
**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]
**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]
**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]
**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]
**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]
**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]
**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]
**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"
**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]
Persona Anti-Patterns
- Don't name them cutely ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
- Don't average across segments — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
- Don't invent details — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
- Revisit quarterly — personas decay as your market and product evolve
Deliverable Formats
Depending on what the user needs, offer:
- Research synthesis report — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
- VOC quote bank — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
- Persona document — 1-3 personas built from the research
- Jobs-to-be-done map — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
- Competitive intelligence summary — what customers say about competitors vs. you
- Research gap analysis — what you still don't know and how to find it
Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.
Questions to Ask Before Proceeding
If context is unclear:
- What's the goal? Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
- What do you already have? (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
- Who is the target segment? (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
- What's your product? (if not in the product marketing context file)
- What do you want delivered? (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)
Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.
Related Skills
| When to hand off |
Skill |
| Writing copy informed by the research |
copywriting |
| Optimizing a page using VOC insights |
cro |
| Building a competitor comparison page |
competitors |
| Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn research |
churn-prevention |
| Planning paid ads informed by research |
ads |
| Writing cold email using research on pain/trigger |
cold-email |
| Translating customer research into an ICP for outbound |
prospecting |
| Planning content based on discovered topics |
content-strategy |
| Rolling research into a comprehensive marketing plan |
marketing-plan |
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
- Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
- Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.
1---2name: customer-research3description: When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research.4license: MIT5---6
7# Customer Research
8## When to Use
9
10Use this skill when you need when the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build...
11
12
13You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.
14
15## Before Starting
16
17**Check for product marketing context first:**
18If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.
19
20---
21
22## Two Modes of Research
23
24### Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets
25You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.
26
27### Mode 2: Go Find Research
28You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.
29
30Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.
31
32---
33
34## Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets
35
36### Asset Types
37
38**Customer interview / sales call transcripts**
39- Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
40- Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them
41
42**Survey results**
43- Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
44- Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
45- Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal
46
47**Customer support conversations**
48- Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
49- Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
50- Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches
51
52**Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes**
53- Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
54- Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
55- Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes
56
57**NPS responses**
58- Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
59- Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment
60
61### Extraction Framework
62
63For each asset, extract:
64
651. **Jobs to Be Done** — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?
66 - Functional job: the task itself
67 - Emotional job: how they want to feel
68 - Social job: how they want to be perceived
69
702. **Pain Points** — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?
71 - Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language
72
733. **Trigger Events** — what changed that made them seek a solution?
74 - Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something
75
764. **Desired Outcomes** — what does success look like in their words?
77 - Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases
78
795. **Language and Vocabulary** — exact words and phrases customers use
80 - This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"
81
826. **Alternatives Considered** — what else did they look at or try?
83 - Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally
84
85### Synthesis Steps
86
87After extracting from individual assets:
88
891. **Cluster by theme** — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
902. **Frequency + intensity scoring** — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
913. **Segment by customer profile** — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
924. **Identify the "money quotes"** — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
935. **Flag contradictions** — where do customers say one thing but do another?
94
95### Research Quality Guardrails
96
97Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:
98
99| Confidence | Criteria |
100|------------|----------|
101| **High** | Theme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments |
102| **Medium** | Theme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment |
103| **Low** | Single source; could be an outlier; needs validation |
104
105**Recency window**: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.
106
107**Sample bias checks**:
108- Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
109- Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
110- Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
111- Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"
112
113**Minimum viable sample**: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.
114
115---
116
117## Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research
118
119Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.
120
121### Where to Look
122
123Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read `references/source-guides.md` for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.
124
125| ICP Type | Primary Sources |
126|----------|----------------|
127| B2B SaaS / technical buyers | Reddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro |
128| SMB / founders | Reddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro |
129| Developer / DevOps | r/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers |
130| B2C / consumer | App store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments |
131| Enterprise | LinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro |
132
133**Quick decision guide:**
134- Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
135- Need to know where your audience spends time? → SparkToro (reveals podcasts, YouTube, subreddits, websites, social accounts)
136- Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
137- Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
138- Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions; SparkToro competitor audience analysis
139
140### What to Extract from Each Source
141
142For every piece of content you find:
143
144| Field | What to Capture |
145|-------|----------------|
146| Source | Platform, thread URL, date |
147| Verbatim quote | Exact words — don't paraphrase |
148| Context | What prompted the comment? |
149| Sentiment | Positive / negative / neutral / frustrated |
150| Theme tag | Pain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language |
151| Customer profile signals | Role, company size, industry hints from the post |
152
153### Research Synthesis Template
154
155After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:
156
157```
158## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)
159
160### Theme 1: [Name]
161**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
162**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
163**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
164**Representative quotes**:
165- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
166- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
167**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning
168
169### Theme 2: ...
170```
171
172---
173
174## Persona Generation
175
176Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.
177
178### Persona Structure
179
180```
181## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]
182
183**Profile**
184- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
185- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
186- Industry: [if narrow]
187- Reports to: [who]
188- Team size managed: [if relevant]
189
190**Primary Job to Be Done**
191[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]
192
193**Trigger Events**
194What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
195- [trigger 1]
196- [trigger 2]
197
198**Top Pains**
1991. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2002. [Pain]
2013. [Pain]
202
203**Desired Outcomes**
204- [What success looks like to them]
205- [How they measure it]
206- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]
207
208**Objections and Fears**
209- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]
210
211**Alternatives They Consider**
212- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]
213
214**Key Vocabulary**
215Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
216- "[phrase]"
217- "[phrase]"
218
219**How to Reach Them**
220- Channels: [where they spend time]
221- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
222- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]
223```
224
225### Persona Anti-Patterns
226
227- **Don't name them cutely** ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
228- **Don't average across segments** — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
229- **Don't invent details** — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
230- **Revisit quarterly** — personas decay as your market and product evolve
231
232---
233
234## Deliverable Formats
235
236Depending on what the user needs, offer:
237
2381. **Research synthesis report** — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
2392. **VOC quote bank** — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
2403. **Persona document** — 1-3 personas built from the research
2414. **Jobs-to-be-done map** — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
2425. **Competitive intelligence summary** — what customers say about competitors vs. you
2436. **Research gap analysis** — what you still don't know and how to find it
244
245Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.
246
247---
248
249## Questions to Ask Before Proceeding
250
251If context is unclear:
252
2531. **What's the goal?** Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
2542. **What do you already have?** (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
2553. **Who is the target segment?** (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
2564. **What's your product?** (if not in the product marketing context file)
2575. **What do you want delivered?** (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)
258
259Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.
260
261---
262
263## Related Skills
264
265| When to hand off | Skill |
266|-----------------|-------|
267| Writing copy informed by the research | `copywriting` |
268| Optimizing a page using VOC insights | `cro` |
269| Building a competitor comparison page | `competitors` |
270| Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn research | `churn-prevention` |
271| Planning paid ads informed by research | `ads` |
272| Writing cold email using research on pain/trigger | `cold-email` |
273| Translating customer research into an ICP for outbound | `prospecting` |
274| Planning content based on discovered topics | `content-strategy` |
275| Rolling research into a comprehensive marketing plan | `marketing-plan` |
276
277## Limitations
278
279- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
280- Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
281- Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.