arXiv Paper → Brief
A research paper → a structured brief a busy expert can trust.
Purpose
Researchers and builders need to triage papers fast without losing rigor. This
skill produces a structured brief that separates what the paper claims from
what it shows, surfaces limitations honestly, and keeps every assertion tied to
the source — so the reader can decide whether to go deeper.
When it fires
- Keyword triggers:
arxiv, paper, summarize this paper, TL;DR,
literature, research brief
- File triggers:
*.pdf, papers/**, *.bib
- Command triggers:
/arxiv-paper-to-brief
Inputs
| Input |
Required |
Notes |
paper |
yes |
arXiv URL/ID, PDF, or pasted text. |
audience |
no |
expert (default), practitioner, or general. |
depth |
no |
tldr, standard (default), or deep. |
Workflow
- Extract metadata — title, authors, venue/date, arXiv ID. ✅ Check: stable
identifier captured.
- State the problem — what gap the paper addresses, in one paragraph.
- Summarize the method — the actual approach, faithfully; name the key idea.
- Report results — headline numbers/claims, each tied to a figure/table/section.
Distinguish claimed from demonstrated.
- List limitations — stated and evident (data, baselines, scope). Be candid.
- Why it matters — implications for the reader's audience; what to do next.
- Pull citations — exact quotes/figures the brief relies on, with locations.
Output contract
{
"metadata": { "title": "string", "authors": "string", "id": "string", "date": "string" },
"problem": "string",
"method": "string",
"results": [{ "claim": "string", "evidence": "string — figure/table/section" }],
"limitations": ["string"],
"why_it_matters": "string",
"citations": ["string — quote/figure + location"]
}
Tools & MCP
- Tools:
WebFetch (arXiv abstract/HTML), Read (PDF/text).
- MCP dependencies: optional docs/library MCP for related-work resolution.
Quality bar
Example
See examples/example-01.md.
Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol
Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.0
Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, sovereignty]
Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer
1---2name: arxiv-paper-to-brief3description: Turn an arXiv (or any research) paper into a structured, citation-faithful brief — problem, method, results, limitations, and why it matters. Use when summarizing a paper, building a literature digest, or asked to 'explain this paper' / 'TL;DR this arxiv link'.4---56# arXiv Paper → Brief78> A research paper → a structured brief a busy expert can trust.910## Purpose1112Researchers and builders need to triage papers fast without losing rigor. This13skill produces a structured brief that separates what the paper *claims* from14what it *shows*, surfaces limitations honestly, and keeps every assertion tied to15the source — so the reader can decide whether to go deeper.1617## When it fires1819- Keyword triggers: `arxiv`, `paper`, `summarize this paper`, `TL;DR`,20 `literature`, `research brief`21- File triggers: `*.pdf`, `papers/**`, `*.bib`22- Command triggers: `/arxiv-paper-to-brief`2324## Inputs2526| Input | Required | Notes |27|-------|----------|-------|28| `paper` | yes | arXiv URL/ID, PDF, or pasted text. |29| `audience` | no | `expert` (default), `practitioner`, or `general`. |30| `depth` | no | `tldr`, `standard` (default), or `deep`. |3132## Workflow33341. **Extract metadata** — title, authors, venue/date, arXiv ID. ✅ Check: stable35 identifier captured.362. **State the problem** — what gap the paper addresses, in one paragraph.373. **Summarize the method** — the actual approach, faithfully; name the key idea.384. **Report results** — headline numbers/claims, each tied to a figure/table/section.39 Distinguish *claimed* from *demonstrated*.405. **List limitations** — stated and evident (data, baselines, scope). Be candid.416. **Why it matters** — implications for the reader's audience; what to do next.427. **Pull citations** — exact quotes/figures the brief relies on, with locations.4344## Output contract4546```json47{48 "metadata": { "title": "string", "authors": "string", "id": "string", "date": "string" },49 "problem": "string",50 "method": "string",51 "results": [{ "claim": "string", "evidence": "string — figure/table/section" }],52 "limitations": ["string"],53 "why_it_matters": "string",54 "citations": ["string — quote/figure + location"]55}56```5758## Tools & MCP5960- Tools: `WebFetch` (arXiv abstract/HTML), `Read` (PDF/text).61- MCP dependencies: optional docs/library MCP for related-work resolution.6263## Quality bar6465- [ ] Every result is tied to a specific figure/table/section.66- [ ] Claimed vs. demonstrated is explicitly distinguished.67- [ ] Limitations are honest, not perfunctory.68- [ ] No fabricated numbers or citations; identifier is correct.6970## Example7172See [`examples/example-01.md`](examples/example-01.md).7374---7576Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol77Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.078Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, sovereignty]79Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer
frankxai