arXiv Space Paper → Brief
An astro-ph paper → a structured brief with the context space readers need.
Purpose
The space-tuned sibling of ../../research/arxiv-paper-to-brief.
Same rigor, plus the context astrophysics readers expect: which objects/missions,
which instruments, and the observational caveats (selection effects, calibration,
model assumptions) that determine how much to trust a result.
When it fires
- Keyword triggers:
astro-ph, astrophysics paper, space paper,
observation paper, mission result
- File triggers:
papers/astro/**, *.pdf
- Command triggers:
/arxiv-space-paper-to-brief
Inputs
| Input |
Required |
Notes |
paper |
yes |
arXiv URL/ID, PDF, or text. |
audience |
no |
astronomer (default), enthusiast, general. |
Workflow
- Metadata + identifier — title, authors, date, arXiv ID. ✅ Check: ID captured.
- Object/mission context — what was observed and with which facility/instrument.
- Problem + method — faithful to the paper.
- Results — each tied to a figure/table; claimed vs. demonstrated separated.
- Observational caveats — selection effects, calibration, sample size, model
dependence. Be candid — this is where space results are over-read.
- Why it matters — for the chosen audience.
- Citations — exact quotes/figures with locations.
Output contract
{
"metadata": { "title": "string", "authors": "string", "id": "string", "date": "string" },
"context": { "objects": ["string"], "instruments": ["string"] },
"problem": "string",
"method": "string",
"results": [{ "claim": "string", "evidence": "string" }],
"caveats": ["string — observational/statistical"],
"why_it_matters": "string",
"citations": ["string"]
}
Tools & MCP
- Tools:
WebFetch, Read. MCP: optional docs/library MCP.
Quality bar
Example
Input: an astro-ph exoplanet-atmosphere paper → brief with the telescope/instrument,
the detection claim tied to a figure, and caveats on signal-to-noise and model
assumptions.
Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol
Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.0
Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, sovereignty]
Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer
1---2name: arxiv-space-paper-to-brief3description: Turn an astrophysics/space-science arXiv paper into a structured brief tuned for space audiences — adds object/mission context, instruments, and observational caveats. Use when summarizing an astro-ph paper, a space-science result, or a mission's published findings.4---56# arXiv Space Paper → Brief78> An astro-ph paper → a structured brief with the context space readers need.910## Purpose1112The space-tuned sibling of [`../../research/arxiv-paper-to-brief`](../../research/arxiv-paper-to-brief).13Same rigor, plus the context astrophysics readers expect: which objects/missions,14which instruments, and the observational caveats (selection effects, calibration,15model assumptions) that determine how much to trust a result.1617## When it fires1819- Keyword triggers: `astro-ph`, `astrophysics paper`, `space paper`,20 `observation paper`, `mission result`21- File triggers: `papers/astro/**`, `*.pdf`22- Command triggers: `/arxiv-space-paper-to-brief`2324## Inputs2526| Input | Required | Notes |27|-------|----------|-------|28| `paper` | yes | arXiv URL/ID, PDF, or text. |29| `audience` | no | `astronomer` (default), `enthusiast`, `general`. |3031## Workflow32331. **Metadata + identifier** — title, authors, date, arXiv ID. ✅ Check: ID captured.342. **Object/mission context** — what was observed and with which facility/instrument.353. **Problem + method** — faithful to the paper.364. **Results** — each tied to a figure/table; claimed vs. demonstrated separated.375. **Observational caveats** — selection effects, calibration, sample size, model38 dependence. Be candid — this is where space results are over-read.396. **Why it matters** — for the chosen audience.407. **Citations** — exact quotes/figures with locations.4142## Output contract4344```json45{46 "metadata": { "title": "string", "authors": "string", "id": "string", "date": "string" },47 "context": { "objects": ["string"], "instruments": ["string"] },48 "problem": "string",49 "method": "string",50 "results": [{ "claim": "string", "evidence": "string" }],51 "caveats": ["string — observational/statistical"],52 "why_it_matters": "string",53 "citations": ["string"]54}55```5657## Tools & MCP5859- Tools: `WebFetch`, `Read`. MCP: optional docs/library MCP.6061## Quality bar6263- [ ] Instruments/objects named correctly.64- [ ] Observational caveats are substantive, not generic.65- [ ] Results tied to figures/tables; identifier correct.6667## Example6869Input: an astro-ph exoplanet-atmosphere paper → brief with the telescope/instrument,70the detection claim tied to a figure, and caveats on signal-to-noise and model71assumptions.7273---7475Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol76Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.077Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, sovereignty]78Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer
frankxai