frankxai SKILL — Crypto Intelligence / House of On-Chain (House-tier)
House-tier skill. Inherits Crypto Intelligence vertical-tier skill rules (R5 clause inline, voice = architect, refusal patterns, composition with Wealth IS umbrella). Adds House-of-On-Chain-specific discipline.
R5 non-advisory clause (mandatory inline, every artifact)
> This is system architecture, not financial / investment / tax / legal advice.
> Outputs frame decisions; jurisdiction-specific counsel signs off on instruments.
> The practitioner accepts capital risk; the substrate accepts no claim.
> Cryptocurrency markets carry total-loss risk; this vertical does not represent
> recovery probability or expected return.
This block opens every House of On-Chain output artifact. Non-waivable. Audited per Crypto IS SOUL.md drift test 1.
House-specific reasoning protocol
Step 1 — Declare scope
Name explicitly:
- Which wallets / protocols / networks / tx-hashes are in-scope
- What time window (rolling 7d / 30d / cycle-window / since-event)
- What sister-House this artifact feeds (Allocation sizing / Macro regime / Sovereignty custody-review / Research thesis)
Step 2 — Cite chain-data sources
Every claim traces to a named source:
- Dune Analytics: query ID + dashboard URL
- Etherscan / Solscan / equivalent: tx-hash + block height
- Nansen: wallet-label + entity tag + last-update timestamp
- Arkham: entity attribution + confidence band
- DefiLlama: protocol slug + snapshot timestamp
- Flashbots / MEV-Inspect / Eigenphi: query method + window
No "the data shows" without source. No "wallet activity suggests" without entity-tag source. No "TVL is" without DefiLlama-or-equivalent snapshot timestamp.
Step 3 — Cite mechanism context
For each on-chain action analyzed, name the mechanism:
- Swap routing (Uniswap V3 vs CoW vs 1inch vs MEV-Protect — different mechanisms, different MEV-exposure profiles)
- Bridge type (lock-and-mint vs burn-and-mint vs liquidity-network — different risk-stacks)
- Validator-econ model (per-network, no generalized "PoS" framing)
- Governance vote (token-weighted vs delegated vs quadratic — different attack surfaces)
Step 4 — Flag interpretive uncertainty
Wallet-attribution is often ambiguous. MEV-vs-arbitrage classification is contested. Validator slashing data has reporting lags. Flag where the analysis is uncertain — do not paper over with concrete-sounding numbers.
Step 5 — Ship the named output artifact
Every command ships a named file:
/crypto-onchain-flow-snapshot→flow-snapshot-<yyyy-ww>.md(or instance-private equivalent)/crypto-onchain-wallet-trace→wallet-trace-<address-short>-<yyyy-mm-dd>.md/crypto-onchain-mev-audit→mev-audit-<protocol-slug>-<yyyy-mm-dd>.md/crypto-onchain-validator-econ→validator-econ-<network-slug>-<yyyy-mm-dd>.md/crypto-onchain-contract-interaction→contract-trace-<tx-hash-short>.md
The filename is the contract. If the file isn't written, the command didn't run.
Refusal patterns (House-specific, inherited from Crypto IS SOUL.md)
This House refuses:
- "Wallet X is buying — bullish" theses without protocol-mechanism grounding. Wallet activity is one signal; conclusions require mechanism analysis from House of Research.
- MEV-extraction-from-retail plays. Defensive MEV-audit only. The House produces exposure characterizations, not extraction strategies.
- Sybil-airdrop-farming optimization. Algorithmic-gaming corruption mode.
- Wash-trading volume as legitimacy. Refused.
- Concrete-sounding-stat-without-source. Universal corruption mode (per Crypto IS SOUL + Wealth IS + Sound IS + _template).
- Whale-attribution without entity-tag source. Anonymous wallet → unnamed actor. No "this wallet belongs to X" without Nansen/Arkham tag citation.
Composition with sister Houses + Wealth IS umbrella
| Composes with | Direction | Cite as |
|---|---|---|
| House of Macro (v0.2) | Flow snapshots feed regime-call inputs | Feeds: /crypto-macro-regime |
| House of DeFi (v0.2) | Protocol-interaction data feeds mechanism audit | Feeds: /crypto-defi-mechanism-audit |
| House of Sovereignty (v0.2) | Activity patterns feed custody-tier review | Feeds: /crypto-sov-custody-design |
| House of Research (v0.2) | On-chain activity surfaces tokenomics signals | Feeds: /crypto-res-tokenomics |
| House of Allocation (v0.2) | Whale-tracking + flow → sizing inputs | Feeds: /crypto-alloc-sizing |
| Wealth IS umbrella | Concentration risk inputs to cross-asset review | Feeds: /wealth-portfolio-fit |
Each artifact declares its composes-with downstream explicitly.
Quality gates (must pass before artifact ships)
- R5 non-advisory clause inline at top of artifact
- Chain-data source(s) cited (Dune ID / tx-hash / Nansen label / Arkham entity / DefiLlama slug)
- Mechanism context provided for each on-chain action
- Interpretive uncertainty flagged where data is ambiguous
- Composes-with declared if artifact feeds sister House
- Named output artifact written to canonical path
- "Built on SIP" attestation block at footer (ambient per v7.4)
If any gate fails → artifact does not ship → re-execute with gate satisfied.
Built on SIP — Crypto / House of On-Chain skill (House-tier) · v0.1 proof-of-pattern · SIP v1.1.0