Design Web

Covers hero discipline (headline/subhead word caps, single primary CTA), body-sequence selection against the canonical-order default, asymmetric grids instead of a uniform 3-column layout, and a set of mechanical anti-slop flags (uniform grids, uniform padding, the AI-signature entrance motion, the reflex blue/Inter/rounded-2xl combo).

Declares the three reproduced elements (Je reproduis, corpus procedures vs sector register) that design-review verdicts, and runs the silhouette Lookalike Test before the page can be called done: a fail is structural and goes back to the hero/body picks, not to a cosmetic tweak.

Design Web — Marketing & Landing, Register Brand

When

After design-system tokens exist and design-method's Gate 0 has locked register brand (one dominant, expressive message). Read design-method's routing table first — a dashboard/app/utility surface routes to design-webapp instead. Exception: a marketing-adjacent surface living inside an app shell (e.g. an in-app pricing page) still routes here for that one page (see design-webapp's reciprocal note).

Input

• design-system.md — OKLCH palette, type pair, spacing density, the 3 dials.
• ../design-method/references/register/brand.md — the page's POV sentence and the per-section Competitor Lift Test (loaded once per task, not re-read per step).
• The generate move report (../design-method/references/moves/generate.md) if this task started from Gate 0 — steps 1-4 of that report (register, inspiration, tokens, and step 4's two picks: hero treatment + body sequence) are inputs here, not repeated.

Steps

1. Structure comes from register + two structural picks, never from template reproduction. references/design-inspiration.md sources taste in a fixed order: the local corpus (references/refs-design/, ten rebuilt pages whose tokens-*.md carry measured procedures) supplies palette, typography, depth and craft; 1-2 real production sites in the client's own sector supply register only — vocabulary, codes, level of formality. Section flow, spacing rhythm and layout are never copied from either. The actual skeleton is the pair named in design-method's generate move: a hero treatment from ../design-method/references/macrostructure-bank.md (first screen only — it decides nothing past the fold) plus a body sequence from ../design-method/references/body-sequence-bank.md, both filtered through the POV in register/brand.md. Naming one without the other is an incomplete plan. Reproducing an inspiration site's structure verbatim is the single biggest source of templated output — treat it as a hard boundary, not a style preference.

2. Pick a body sequence, and state what its principle becomes for this subject. The body, not the hero, is the proven failure mode (register/brand.md). Choose one of the ten sequences read off shipped code in ../design-method/references/body-sequence-bank.md and name it in the plan in that file's own format: "Body sequence: {name} — principle applied here: {one line}." State the principle in the brief's own terms; a plan naming the sequence but not what its principle becomes here has copied a composition. Deviating from the chosen sequence is expected, not forbidden — report which section moved and why in the generate-move report's macrostructure line. The canonical skeleton (nav → hero → features → testimonials → pricing → faq → cta → footer) is the detectable default when it is reached by omission; it is also entry 5 of the bank ("Bookended Canon"), legitimately choosable when it is actually treated — fora follows it almost to the letter without reading generic, for the measured reasons in its sheet (bank rule 2). Sections kept from the canon stay governed by register/brand.md §2 (Body ≠ SaaS Furniture) and its per-section Competitor Lift Test.

3. Hero discipline (nngroup visual-hierarchy, lawsofux, refactoringui): headline < 10 words, subhead < 20 words, 1 primary CTA, real product/brand visual (not a stock abstraction). This word-count floor is tighter than references/layout-discipline.md's hero hard numbers (≤ 2 lines, ≤ 4-element stack) — both apply; the tighter one wins on conflict. CTAs stay ≤ 3 touchpoints on the whole page, secondaries visually subordinate to the one primary. Von Restorff: exactly one visually distinct focal element per viewport reads as memorable — see the Focal-Block Floor (layout-discipline.md rule 9), mandatory in this register.

4. Break grid and padding sameness. Prefer asymmetric column splits (2/1, 1/2, span-2, bento) over a uniform 3-column grid reused section after section. Vary section padding for rhythm — tight groupings inside a section, generous separation between sections — instead of one uniform value applied everywhere. layout-discipline.md still owns the numeric caps (eyebrow restraint, zigzag cap, bento N=N, section-repetition ban) once a skeleton is chosen; don't re-derive those here.

5. Anti-slop mechanical flags — lintable, check the rendered markup. Each row's grounding lives where that rule is canonical (references/design-inspiration.md for the reflex combo, references/layout-discipline.md for the eyebrow cap); this table sources nothing on its own.

   Slop signal	Mechanical flag	Antidote
   Canonical section order by default	The 8-section skeleton above, used verbatim, with no body sequence named in the plan	Step 2 — name a sequence and its principle
   Uniform 3-col grid	Same grid-cols-3 (or equivalent) reused across ≥3 unrelated sections	Step 4 — asymmetric splits
   Uniform section padding	Identical py-20/py-24 (or equivalent) on every section	Step 4 — vary per section
   Eyebrow over every H1	See layout-discipline.md Eyebrow Restraint (max 1 per 3 sections)	Already governed there — don't restate
   Signature entrance motion	opacity:0 + translateY(20px) + ease-in-out scroll-reveal — the most widespread AI-generated entrance signature	Vary offset/easing/stagger — ../design-motion/references/entrance-patterns.md
   Reflex palette+font+shape combo	Tailwind blue/indigo (hue 200–290°) + Inter + rounded-2xl used together as the default	Banned outright — pull real tokens from design-system.md/../design-system/references/sector-palettes.md/typography-pairs.md

6. Select components against the brief, not by default. Pull component patterns from references/cards-guide.md, references/buttons-guide.md, references/component-composition-ref.md, and 2-3 matching entries from references/premium-patterns/PATTERNS.md — each pattern's AI Generation Prompt is subordinated to the POV from register/brand.md, never dropped in unedited. No component earns a place because it's common; each maps to a real content need.

7. Ship HTML/CSS directly (default path, same method as Anthropic's frontend-design skill: commit to a point of view, verify with tools not vibes). Gemini Design MCP (references/gemini/), Magic (21st.dev), and shadcn MCP are optional fallback tools, never a requirement.

Declared Elements — the Je reproduis line

Before handoff, write this line into the deliverable's report and into design-system.md, verbatim in this format. design-review reads it as the input to its binary present/absent verdict (../design-review/SKILL.md Input, ../design-review/references/review-procedure.md Input + Part 2 item 4):

Je reproduis: {el1} [corpus: {reference}/{tokens section}], {el2} [corpus: {reference}/{tokens section}], {el3} [sector: {url} — register]

Exactly three elements, each nameable in the rendered page — the verdict is binary, so "a refined atmosphere" is not an element while "the two vertical rules crossing every section boundary" is. Two come from the corpus: a measured procedure, cited with the tokens-*.md section it was read from — and taken from a page you opened and scrolled, not from a section index. The rendered pages come first, the markdown second (references/refs-design/README.md §Look before you read); a procedure cited from a file whose page was never rendered is a value with no referent, and design-review now asks for the list of pages opened alongside this line. One comes from the sector: a register signal (vocabulary, formality, what this vertical shows), never a craft borrowing — craft is the corpus's job. If the sector step produced nothing usable, write [sector: none — register from brief] and still declare three elements.

Output Gate — Lookalike Test

Runs after step 7, before handoff. Its definition is canonical in references/design-inspiration.md (silhouette method and comparison set live there — not restated or renumbered here). A fail is structural, never cosmetic: send it back to steps 1-2 (hero treatment + body sequence), not to step 4.

Failure Handling

• Gemini Design MCP (if chosen) unavailable → fall back to direct generation, note it in the report.
• No usable sector site found for register → proceed on the corpus + the two structural picks + the brief's own register, and flag the missing sector signal in the generate-move report and in the Je reproduis line. Never block generation on inspiration sourcing, and never substitute a template platform (banned in references/design-inspiration.md).
• Lookalike test fails twice on the same pair of picks → change the body sequence in ../design-method/references/body-sequence-bank.md (a different hero treatment alone does not address the failure mode), don't re-attempt the same skeleton a 3rd time.

Output

• HTML/CSS for the page/component, hero treatment + body sequence named with the sequence's principle restated for this subject, asymmetric grid(s), hero within the word/element caps, anti-slop table above checked, the Je reproduis line written, lookalike test passed.
• Ready for design-motion.

Next → design-motion, then design-review.

References

Shared with design-webapp (load from there, don't duplicate)