Competitive Research (Global)
Information gathering
Ask user up to 4 questions before starting:
- What's your product / service? (Industry, price tier, primary audience)
- Name 2-5 competitors you know (brand names, page/TikTok/website links if available)
- What worries you most about competitors? (Cheaper pricing? Better content? Stronger ads? Market share?)
- Goal after this report? (Reposition? Improve content? Find market gap? Run ads more effectively?)
Auto-research via tools (if available)
A. Global research tools
| Tool |
What it does |
Free tier? |
| SimilarWeb |
Website traffic estimation, top sources, competitor comparison |
Yes (limited) |
| Ahrefs |
SEO/backlink analysis, keyword competition |
Trial only |
| Semrush |
SEO, ads research, keyword gap, competitor traffic sources |
Yes (limited) |
| Meta Ads Library |
All competitor ads currently running on Meta — public, free |
Yes (free) |
| TikTok Creative Center |
Top performing ads by industry, region |
Yes (free) |
| Minea |
Dropshipping ad spy — top selling products on FB/TikTok |
Trial only |
| AdSpy / BigSpy |
Ad intelligence across platforms |
Paid only |
B. Meta Ads Library (free, no signup needed)
For each competitor:
- Go to
facebook.com/ads/library
- Filter by country + advertiser
- Note: format mix (video/image/carousel), hooks used, CTAs, run duration
- Compare against your ads -> find gaps and opportunities
C. Dropshipping-specific tools (Minea, Adspy, Pipiads)
For dropshipping competitor research:
- Minea — Track top FB/TikTok ads by product, find winning products
- Pipiads — TikTok Shop best sellers, ad performance data
- AdSpy — Search ads by keyword, advertiser, country
See skill 29-dropshipping-mastery-global for full dropshipping research workflow.
3-tier competitor model
Categorize competitors into 3 groups — don't just look at direct competitors:
| Tier |
Definition |
Criteria |
Example (Mid-tier Spa) |
| Direct |
Same tier, same offering, same audience |
Same price, same service, same area |
Spa B same street, similar pricing |
| Indirect potential |
Different offering but substitutable |
Customer might pick them instead |
Cosmetic clinic, at-home skincare, home beauty devices |
| Secondary |
Same offering, different price tier |
Competes when budget shifts |
Premium spa (customer downgrades), budget spa (upgrades) |
Selection rules
- Direct: pick 3-5 main competitors
- Indirect potential: pick 2-3 substitute categories
- Secondary: pick 1-2 competitors at adjacent price tier
Per-competitor analysis structure
For each competitor, analyze 8 dimensions:
1. Brand positioning
| Element |
Content |
| Main message |
[Slogan, tagline, brand promise] |
| Visual style |
[Color tone, photo style, video quality] |
| Price tier |
[Low / Medium / High / Premium] |
| Target audience |
[Gender, age, income, interests] |
| Stated USP |
[What do they claim is their differentiation?] |
2. Strengths and weaknesses
| Strengths |
Weaknesses |
| [List 3-5] |
[List 3-5] |
3. Content strategy
| Metric |
Value |
| Main channel |
[Facebook / TikTok / Instagram / YouTube / Email] |
| Posting frequency |
[X posts/week] |
| Priority format |
[Short video / Carousel / Long post / Reels] |
| Tone of voice |
[Professional / Friendly / Humorous / Educational] |
| Content angle mix |
[TOFU X% / MOFU X% / BOFU X%] |
| Best performing content |
[Top 3 highest engagement posts/videos] |
4. Channels and platforms
| Channel |
Yes / No |
Followers / Likes |
Activity rating |
| Facebook Page |
|
|
|
| TikTok |
|
|
|
| Instagram |
|
|
|
| YouTube |
|
|
|
| LinkedIn |
|
|
|
| Website |
|
|
|
| Email |
|
|
|
5. Ad spend estimation
Estimation method (no need for absolute precision):
| Signal |
How to read |
| Sponsored posts/month |
Count "Sponsored" labeled posts in Meta Ads Library |
| TikTok video ad volume |
TikTok Creative Center -> Top Ads -> filter by industry |
| Website traffic |
SimilarWeb (free tier) or Semrush |
| KOL/UGC volume |
Count brand-tagged videos on TikTok |
| Estimated metric |
Value |
| Active ads (Meta Ads Library) |
[X ads] |
| Estimated monthly ad spend |
[$X — based on ad count x avg CPM] |
| Has UGC/KOL? |
[Yes/No — if yes, estimated X people] |
6. Audience overlap
| Element |
Overlap level |
| Geography |
[High / Medium / Low] |
| Age |
[High / Medium / Low] |
| Income |
[High / Medium / Low] |
| Interests |
[High / Medium / Low] |
| Channels used |
[High / Medium / Low] |
7. Pricing and business model
| Product/service |
Competitor price |
Your price |
Difference |
| [SKU 1] |
|
|
|
| [SKU 2] |
|
|
|
| [SKU 3] |
|
|
|
8. Threat level assessment
| Competitor |
Threat level |
Reason |
| [Name] |
High / Medium / Low |
[1 short sentence] |
SWOT — Your brand vs Competitors
SWOT summary table
|
Positive |
Negative |
| Internal |
STRENGTHS — Your strengths competitors don't have or are weaker at |
WEAKNESSES — Your weak points competitors exploit |
| External |
OPPORTUNITIES — Market gaps competitors haven't claimed |
THREATS — Competitor trends/moves threatening you |
Detail
Strengths
| # |
Strength |
Which competitor weak here? |
How to leverage |
| 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
Weaknesses
| # |
Weakness |
Which competitor strong here? |
How to fix |
| 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
Opportunities
| # |
Opportunity |
Why competitors haven't done it? |
Recommended action |
| 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
Threats
| # |
Threat |
From which competitor? |
Defense strategy |
| 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
Positioning Map
2x2 matrix — pick 2 axes that fit your industry:
Default axes: Price x Perceived Quality
HIGH QUALITY
|
|
Comp C | [YOU]
(cheap, | (mid price,
good qual)| good qual)
|
------- LOW -------- HIGH ---- PRICE
|
Comp A | Comp B
(cheap, | (high price,
low qual) | low qual)
|
LOW QUALITY
Alternative axes (by industry)
| X-axis (horizontal) |
Y-axis (vertical) |
Best for |
| Price |
Perceived quality |
Spa, F&B, fashion |
| Traditional vs Modern |
Mainstream vs Niche |
Education, tech |
| Convenience vs Experience |
Mass vs Premium |
F&B, retail |
| Online vs Offline |
Self-serve vs Full service |
Service, SaaS |
How to read the map:
- Crowded corner = fierce competition, avoid
- Empty corner = gap to claim
- Heavy corner = many competitors, need strong differentiator
Find market gaps (Market Gap)
5 gap types framework
| Gap type |
Check question |
Finding |
| Product gap |
What need are customers solving DIY because no one serves it? |
|
| Price gap |
What price tier has no one claimed? (between budget and premium) |
|
| Channel gap |
What channel are competitors ignoring? (Email? TikTok Shop? SEO?) |
|
| Content gap |
What angle hasn't been done? (behind scenes? educational? data-driven?) |
|
| Experience gap |
What customer journey step is no one doing well? |
|
Gap evaluation
| Gap |
Attractiveness (1-5) |
Feasibility (1-5) |
Priority |
| [Gap 1] |
|
|
High / Medium / Low |
| [Gap 2] |
|
|
|
| [Gap 3] |
|
|
|
Content Benchmark — Best-performing competitor content
Top-performing content analysis
For each competitor, pick top 5 posts/videos by engagement in last 30 days:
| # |
Competitor |
Format |
Angle |
Views/Reach |
Engagement |
Why effective? |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extract pattern
| Pattern |
Description |
Apply to you |
| Common hook |
[Hook style competitors use] |
[Apply / Don't apply — reason] |
| Strong format |
[Video/Carousel/Text most effective?] |
|
| Posting time |
[What hour, what day?] |
|
| Common CTA |
[What CTA type?] |
|
| Viral element |
[Common trait of effective content?] |
|
Learn vs Don't copy
LEARN from competitors
| Lesson |
From which competitor |
How to apply |
| Effective content format |
|
[Adapt how] |
| Strong channel |
|
[Implementation] |
| Customer service |
|
[Improvement] |
| Pricing strategy |
|
[Adjustment] |
DON'T copy
| Don't copy |
Reason |
Do this instead |
| Copy content verbatim |
Lose identity, suffer comparison |
Take idea, adapt to your brand voice |
| Race to the bottom (price) |
Unsustainable |
Compete on value, not price |
| Imitate positioning |
Become "cheap copy" |
Find unique angle, differentiate |
| Follow trends they did |
Late, lost effectiveness |
Find new trends or new angle on old |
Competitive moat assessment
| Moat type |
Competitor has? |
You have? |
Action |
| Brand recognition — First-recall |
|
|
|
| Network effect — More users = more attractive |
|
|
|
| Switching cost — Hard for customers to leave |
|
|
|
| Data advantage — Big customer data |
|
|
|
| Content library — Large content library, strong SEO |
|
|
|
| Community — Loyal community |
|
|
|
| Distribution — Strong channel network |
|
|
|
Action table
Priority recommendations
| # |
Action |
Based on finding |
Urgency |
Timeline |
| 1 |
|
|
High / Medium |
Wk 1-2 |
| 2 |
|
|
|
Wk 2-4 |
| 3 |
|
|
|
Mo 2 |
| 4 |
|
|
|
Mo 3 |
| 5 |
|
|
|
Long-term |
Cross-reference
- Need deeper customer understanding? -> Use
09-customer-insight-global
- Want to reposition and write brief? -> Use
02-campaign-brief-global
- Need differentiated copy? -> Use
05-ad-copy-global
- Need competitive budget calculation? -> Use
10-reverse-kpi-global
- Need full marketing plan? -> Use
00-marketing-plan-global
- Dropshipping research? -> Use
29-dropshipping-mastery-global
Quality checklist
Before delivering report, check:
1---2name: 08-competitor-research-global3description: Use when the user needs to understand competitors — direct, indirect, and substitute tiers, positioning map, SWOT, ad and content benchmark, pricing comparison, and the market gap to attack, using SimilarWeb, Ahrefs, Semrush, and the Meta Ad Library. Trigger on 'competitor research', 'competitive analysis', 'what are competitors running', 'who else sells this', 'why do people pick them over us', 'benchmark us against the market'. Also use when the user sends a competitor link and asks for an opinion. Not for — understanding the customer rather than the rival, see `09-customer-insight-global`; turning difference into a statement, see `58-positioning-global`; paid targeting, see `51-audience-research-global`.4license: MIT5---6
7# Competitive Research (Global)
8
9## Information gathering
10
11Ask user up to 4 questions before starting:
12
131. **What's your product / service?** (Industry, price tier, primary audience)
142. **Name 2-5 competitors you know** (brand names, page/TikTok/website links if available)
153. **What worries you most about competitors?** (Cheaper pricing? Better content? Stronger ads? Market share?)
164. **Goal after this report?** (Reposition? Improve content? Find market gap? Run ads more effectively?)
17
18### Auto-research via tools (if available)
19
20#### A. Global research tools
21
22| Tool | What it does | Free tier? |
23|------|--------------|-----------|
24| **SimilarWeb** | Website traffic estimation, top sources, competitor comparison | Yes (limited) |
25| **Ahrefs** | SEO/backlink analysis, keyword competition | Trial only |
26| **Semrush** | SEO, ads research, keyword gap, competitor traffic sources | Yes (limited) |
27| **Meta Ads Library** | All competitor ads currently running on Meta — public, free | Yes (free) |
28| **TikTok Creative Center** | Top performing ads by industry, region | Yes (free) |
29| **Minea** | Dropshipping ad spy — top selling products on FB/TikTok | Trial only |
30| **AdSpy / BigSpy** | Ad intelligence across platforms | Paid only |
31
32#### B. Meta Ads Library (free, no signup needed)
33
34For each competitor:
351. Go to `facebook.com/ads/library`
362. Filter by country + advertiser
373. Note: format mix (video/image/carousel), hooks used, CTAs, run duration
384. Compare against your ads -> find gaps and opportunities
39
40#### C. Dropshipping-specific tools (Minea, Adspy, Pipiads)
41
42For dropshipping competitor research:
43- **Minea** — Track top FB/TikTok ads by product, find winning products
44- **Pipiads** — TikTok Shop best sellers, ad performance data
45- **AdSpy** — Search ads by keyword, advertiser, country
46
47> See skill `29-dropshipping-mastery-global` for full dropshipping research workflow.
48
49---
50
51## 3-tier competitor model
52
53Categorize competitors into 3 groups — don't just look at direct competitors:
54
55| Tier | Definition | Criteria | Example (Mid-tier Spa) |
56|------|------------|----------|------------------------|
57| **Direct** | Same tier, same offering, same audience | Same price, same service, same area | Spa B same street, similar pricing |
58| **Indirect potential** | Different offering but substitutable | Customer might pick them instead | Cosmetic clinic, at-home skincare, home beauty devices |
59| **Secondary** | Same offering, different price tier | Competes when budget shifts | Premium spa (customer downgrades), budget spa (upgrades) |
60
61### Selection rules
62
63- Direct: pick 3-5 main competitors
64- Indirect potential: pick 2-3 substitute categories
65- Secondary: pick 1-2 competitors at adjacent price tier
66
67---
68
69## Per-competitor analysis structure
70
71For each competitor, analyze 8 dimensions:
72
73### 1. Brand positioning
74
75| Element | Content |
76|---------|---------|
77| Main message | [Slogan, tagline, brand promise] |
78| Visual style | [Color tone, photo style, video quality] |
79| Price tier | [Low / Medium / High / Premium] |
80| Target audience | [Gender, age, income, interests] |
81| Stated USP | [What do they claim is their differentiation?] |
82
83### 2. Strengths and weaknesses
84
85| Strengths | Weaknesses |
86|-----------|------------|
87| [List 3-5] | [List 3-5] |
88
89### 3. Content strategy
90
91| Metric | Value |
92|--------|-------|
93| Main channel | [Facebook / TikTok / Instagram / YouTube / Email] |
94| Posting frequency | [X posts/week] |
95| Priority format | [Short video / Carousel / Long post / Reels] |
96| Tone of voice | [Professional / Friendly / Humorous / Educational] |
97| Content angle mix | [TOFU X% / MOFU X% / BOFU X%] |
98| Best performing content | [Top 3 highest engagement posts/videos] |
99
100### 4. Channels and platforms
101
102| Channel | Yes / No | Followers / Likes | Activity rating |
103|---------|----------|-------------------|-----------------|
104| Facebook Page | | | |
105| TikTok | | | |
106| Instagram | | | |
107| YouTube | | | |
108| LinkedIn | | | |
109| Website | | | |
110| Email | | | |
111
112### 5. Ad spend estimation
113
114Estimation method (no need for absolute precision):
115
116| Signal | How to read |
117|--------|-------------|
118| Sponsored posts/month | Count "Sponsored" labeled posts in Meta Ads Library |
119| TikTok video ad volume | TikTok Creative Center -> Top Ads -> filter by industry |
120| Website traffic | SimilarWeb (free tier) or Semrush |
121| KOL/UGC volume | Count brand-tagged videos on TikTok |
122
123| Estimated metric | Value |
124|------------------|-------|
125| Active ads (Meta Ads Library) | [X ads] |
126| Estimated monthly ad spend | [$X — based on ad count x avg CPM] |
127| Has UGC/KOL? | [Yes/No — if yes, estimated X people] |
128
129### 6. Audience overlap
130
131| Element | Overlap level |
132|---------|---------------|
133| Geography | [High / Medium / Low] |
134| Age | [High / Medium / Low] |
135| Income | [High / Medium / Low] |
136| Interests | [High / Medium / Low] |
137| Channels used | [High / Medium / Low] |
138
139### 7. Pricing and business model
140
141| Product/service | Competitor price | Your price | Difference |
142|-----------------|------------------|------------|------------|
143| [SKU 1] | | | |
144| [SKU 2] | | | |
145| [SKU 3] | | | |
146
147### 8. Threat level assessment
148
149| Competitor | Threat level | Reason |
150|------------|--------------|--------|
151| [Name] | High / Medium / Low | [1 short sentence] |
152
153---
154
155## SWOT — Your brand vs Competitors
156
157### SWOT summary table
158
159| | **Positive** | **Negative** |
160|---|---|---|
161| **Internal** | **STRENGTHS** — Your strengths competitors don't have or are weaker at | **WEAKNESSES** — Your weak points competitors exploit |
162| **External** | **OPPORTUNITIES** — Market gaps competitors haven't claimed | **THREATS** — Competitor trends/moves threatening you |
163
164### Detail
165
166**Strengths**
167| # | Strength | Which competitor weak here? | How to leverage |
168|---|----------|----------------------------|-----------------|
169| 1 | | | |
170| 2 | | | |
171| 3 | | | |
172
173**Weaknesses**
174| # | Weakness | Which competitor strong here? | How to fix |
175|---|----------|------------------------------|------------|
176| 1 | | | |
177| 2 | | | |
178| 3 | | | |
179
180**Opportunities**
181| # | Opportunity | Why competitors haven't done it? | Recommended action |
182|---|-------------|----------------------------------|--------------------|
183| 1 | | | |
184| 2 | | | |
185| 3 | | | |
186
187**Threats**
188| # | Threat | From which competitor? | Defense strategy |
189|---|--------|------------------------|------------------|
190| 1 | | | |
191| 2 | | | |
192| 3 | | | |
193
194---
195
196## Positioning Map
197
1982x2 matrix — pick 2 axes that fit your industry:
199
200### Default axes: Price x Perceived Quality
201
202```
203 HIGH QUALITY
204 |
205 |
206 Comp C | [YOU]
207 (cheap, | (mid price,
208 good qual)| good qual)
209 |
210------- LOW -------- HIGH ---- PRICE
211 |
212 Comp A | Comp B
213 (cheap, | (high price,
214 low qual) | low qual)
215 |
216 LOW QUALITY
217```
218
219### Alternative axes (by industry)
220
221| X-axis (horizontal) | Y-axis (vertical) | Best for |
222|---------------------|-------------------|----------|
223| Price | Perceived quality | Spa, F&B, fashion |
224| Traditional vs Modern | Mainstream vs Niche | Education, tech |
225| Convenience vs Experience | Mass vs Premium | F&B, retail |
226| Online vs Offline | Self-serve vs Full service | Service, SaaS |
227
228**How to read the map:**
229- Crowded corner = fierce competition, avoid
230- Empty corner = gap to claim
231- Heavy corner = many competitors, need strong differentiator
232
233---
234
235## Find market gaps (Market Gap)
236
237### 5 gap types framework
238
239| Gap type | Check question | Finding |
240|----------|---------------|---------|
241| **Product gap** | What need are customers solving DIY because no one serves it? | |
242| **Price gap** | What price tier has no one claimed? (between budget and premium) | |
243| **Channel gap** | What channel are competitors ignoring? (Email? TikTok Shop? SEO?) | |
244| **Content gap** | What angle hasn't been done? (behind scenes? educational? data-driven?) | |
245| **Experience gap** | What customer journey step is no one doing well? | |
246
247### Gap evaluation
248
249| Gap | Attractiveness (1-5) | Feasibility (1-5) | Priority |
250|-----|---------------------|-------------------|----------|
251| [Gap 1] | | | High / Medium / Low |
252| [Gap 2] | | | |
253| [Gap 3] | | | |
254
255---
256
257## Content Benchmark — Best-performing competitor content
258
259### Top-performing content analysis
260
261For each competitor, pick top 5 posts/videos by engagement in last 30 days:
262
263| # | Competitor | Format | Angle | Views/Reach | Engagement | Why effective? |
264|---|------------|--------|-------|-------------|------------|----------------|
265| 1 | | | | | | |
266| 2 | | | | | | |
267| 3 | | | | | | |
268| 4 | | | | | | |
269| 5 | | | | | | |
270
271### Extract pattern
272
273| Pattern | Description | Apply to you |
274|---------|-------------|--------------|
275| Common hook | [Hook style competitors use] | [Apply / Don't apply — reason] |
276| Strong format | [Video/Carousel/Text most effective?] | |
277| Posting time | [What hour, what day?] | |
278| Common CTA | [What CTA type?] | |
279| Viral element | [Common trait of effective content?] | |
280
281---
282
283## Learn vs Don't copy
284
285### LEARN from competitors
286
287| Lesson | From which competitor | How to apply |
288|--------|----------------------|--------------|
289| Effective content format | | [Adapt how] |
290| Strong channel | | [Implementation] |
291| Customer service | | [Improvement] |
292| Pricing strategy | | [Adjustment] |
293
294### DON'T copy
295
296| Don't copy | Reason | Do this instead |
297|------------|--------|-----------------|
298| Copy content verbatim | Lose identity, suffer comparison | Take idea, adapt to your brand voice |
299| Race to the bottom (price) | Unsustainable | Compete on value, not price |
300| Imitate positioning | Become "cheap copy" | Find unique angle, differentiate |
301| Follow trends they did | Late, lost effectiveness | Find new trends or new angle on old |
302
303---
304
305## Competitive moat assessment
306
307| Moat type | Competitor has? | You have? | Action |
308|-----------|-----------------|-----------|--------|
309| **Brand recognition** — First-recall | | | |
310| **Network effect** — More users = more attractive | | | |
311| **Switching cost** — Hard for customers to leave | | | |
312| **Data advantage** — Big customer data | | | |
313| **Content library** — Large content library, strong SEO | | | |
314| **Community** — Loyal community | | | |
315| **Distribution** — Strong channel network | | | |
316
317---
318
319## Action table
320
321### Priority recommendations
322
323| # | Action | Based on finding | Urgency | Timeline |
324|---|--------|------------------|---------|----------|
325| 1 | | | High / Medium | Wk 1-2 |
326| 2 | | | | Wk 2-4 |
327| 3 | | | | Mo 2 |
328| 4 | | | | Mo 3 |
329| 5 | | | | Long-term |
330
331---
332
333## Cross-reference
334
335- Need deeper customer understanding? -> Use `09-customer-insight-global`
336- Want to reposition and write brief? -> Use `02-campaign-brief-global`
337- Need differentiated copy? -> Use `05-ad-copy-global`
338- Need competitive budget calculation? -> Use `10-reverse-kpi-global`
339- Need full marketing plan? -> Use `00-marketing-plan-global`
340- Dropshipping research? -> Use `29-dropshipping-mastery-global`
341
342---
343
344## Quality checklist
345
346Before delivering report, check:
347
348- [ ] Categorized competitors into 3 tiers (direct, indirect, secondary)
349- [ ] Each competitor has all 8 analysis dimensions
350- [ ] SWOT specific, not generic — each point names specific competitor
351- [ ] Positioning map axes fit industry
352- [ ] Found at least 3 market gaps
353- [ ] Content benchmark has specific data (links, numbers), not vague observations
354- [ ] "Learn vs Don't copy" section has specific actions
355- [ ] Competitive moat assessed for both competitor and you
356- [ ] Action table has timeline and urgency
357- [ ] No unsupported claims — every conclusion has data or specific observation