Academic Research
Complete research lifecycle: project setup, literature review, writing, publication, and defense.
Project Structure
research-project/
├── .github/
│ └── copilot-instructions.md # Research context for the AI assistant
├── docs/
│ ├── RESEARCH-PLAN.md # Questions, timeline, milestones
│ ├── METHODOLOGY.md # Design decisions
│ └── DECISION-LOG.md # Key decisions with rationale
├── data/
│ ├── raw/ # Untouched source data
│ ├── processed/ # Cleaned/transformed
│ └── DATA-DICTIONARY.md # Variable definitions
├── analysis/
│ ├── scripts/ # Analysis code
│ └── outputs/ # Figures, tables
├── writing/
│ ├── drafts/ # Work in progress
│ └── submissions/ # Submitted versions
├── references/
│ ├── LITERATURE-MATRIX.md # Systematic tracking
│ └── notes/ # Reading notes
└── README.md
Quick Setup
mkdir -p .github docs data/{raw,processed} analysis/{scripts,outputs} writing/{drafts,submissions} references/notes
touch docs/RESEARCH-PLAN.md docs/METHODOLOGY.md references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md .github/copilot-instructions.md
Research Project Types
| Type |
Duration |
Output |
Review |
| Master's Thesis |
1-2 years |
80-150 pages |
Committee defense |
| PhD Dissertation |
3-7 years |
150-300+ pages |
Committee + external |
| Journal Article |
3-12 months |
5,000-10,000 words |
Peer review |
| Conference Paper |
2-6 months |
4,000-8,000 words |
Peer review |
Research Question Development
PICO Framework
- Population — Who is being studied?
- Intervention — What is being tested?
- Comparison — Against what?
- Outcome — What is measured?
FINER Criteria
| Criterion |
Question |
| Feasible |
Can it be done with available resources? |
| Interesting |
Does anyone care? |
| Novel |
Does it add new knowledge? |
| Ethical |
Can it be done ethically? |
| Relevant |
Does it matter to the field? |
Literature Review
Synthesis Approaches
| Approach |
When to Use |
| Thematic |
Organize by concepts across sources |
| Chronological |
Show field evolution |
| Methodological |
Compare research approaches |
| Concept Matrix |
Map concepts to sources in table |
Gap Types
- Empirical — No studies in specific context
- Theoretical — Theory not applied to domain
- Methodological — New methods could reveal insights
- Population — Understudied demographic
Literature Matrix Template
| Citation | Year | Method | Findings | Gaps | Relevance |
|----------|------|--------|----------|------|-----------|
| Author1 et al. | 2024 | RCT | X | Y | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Methodology
Qualitative Methods
| Method |
Best For |
Sample |
| Interviews |
Deep understanding |
10-30 |
| Focus Groups |
Group dynamics |
4-8/group |
| Case Study |
Detailed exploration |
1-10 |
| Grounded Theory |
Theory generation |
Until saturation |
Quantitative Methods
| Method |
Best For |
Sample |
| Survey |
Breadth, generalization |
100-1000+ |
| Experiment |
Causation |
Power analysis |
| Quasi-experiment |
No randomization |
Varies |
Mixed Methods
- Convergent — Qual + quant simultaneously
- Explanatory Sequential — Quant → Qual
- Exploratory Sequential — Qual → Quant
Thesis/Dissertation Structure
- Introduction — Problem, significance, research questions
- Literature Review — Framework, prior work, gaps
- Methodology — Design, collection, analysis
- Results — Data without interpretation
- Discussion — Interpret, connect to literature
- Conclusion — Summary, contributions, limitations
Discipline Variations
| Discipline |
Variation |
| Sciences |
Methods-heavy |
| Humanities |
Multiple thematic chapters |
| Social Sciences |
Separate theoretical framework |
| Engineering |
Implementation + Evaluation chapters |
Academic Writing
Hedging Language
| Strong |
Hedged |
| "This proves..." |
"This suggests..." |
| "Always causes" |
"May contribute to" |
| "Definitely shows" |
"Evidence indicates" |
CARS Model (Introductions)
- Establish territory — topic importance
- Establish niche — gap in knowledge
- Occupy niche — your contribution
Citation Density
| Section |
Density |
| Abstract |
None |
| Introduction |
Medium |
| Related Work |
High |
| Methods |
Low-Medium |
| Results |
Low |
| Discussion |
Medium |
Publication Workflow
Venue Selection
| Research Type |
Venue |
| User study with metrics |
ACM CHI |
| Business implications |
Harvard Business Review |
| Cognitive theory |
Cognitive Systems Research |
| Philosophical AI argument |
Minds & Machines |
5-Phase Process
| Phase |
Duration |
Focus |
| Preparation |
1-2 weeks |
Literature, outline, figures |
| Rough Draft |
1-2 weeks |
Write without editing |
| Revision |
1-2 weeks |
Structure → Section → Paragraph → Sentence |
| Feedback |
2-4 weeks |
Advisor, peers |
| Polish |
1 week |
Format, citations, submit |
Responding to Reviews
## Response to Reviewer 1
### R1.1: "[Concern]"
We appreciate this observation. [How addressed].
Changes: Section X, paragraph Y: [new text]
Committee Navigation
Defense Preparation
- Anticipate likely questions
- Prepare 20-30 minute presentation
- Know your limitations
- Have backup slides
- Practice with friendly audience
Common Concerns
| Concern |
Address With |
| "Why this topic?" |
Strong motivation |
| "What's your contribution?" |
Explicit list |
| "How is this valid?" |
Robust methodology |
| "What about X?" |
Scope, future work |
Citation Management
| Style |
Discipline |
| APA 7 |
Psychology, social sciences |
| MLA 9 |
Humanities |
| Chicago |
History |
| IEEE |
Engineering, CS |
| Vancouver |
Medicine |
Refactoring Existing Projects
Audit Checklist
Migration Pattern
git mv old-data.csv data/raw/
git mv cleaned.csv data/processed/
git mv draft.docx writing/drafts/paper-v1.docx
File Templates
RESEARCH-PLAN.md
# Research Plan: [Title]
## Research Questions
1. Primary: [Main question]
2. Secondary: [Supporting questions]
## Timeline
| Phase | Duration | Deliverable |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Literature | Weeks 1-4 | Matrix complete |
| Collection | Weeks 5-12 | Raw data |
| Analysis | Weeks 13-16 | Results |
| Writing | Weeks 17-20 | Draft |
copilot-instructions.md (Research)
# [Project] - Research Context
## Current Phase
- [x] Literature Review
- [ ] Data Collection
## the AI assistant Guidance
- Add literature to references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md
- Log decisions in docs/DECISION-LOG.md
- Citation style: APA 7
Pre-Submission Checklist
Tools
| Tool |
Purpose |
| Zotero |
Reference management |
| Overleaf |
LaTeX collaboration |
| Connected Papers |
Literature discovery |
| Pandoc |
Markdown to Word/PDF |
Related Skills
literature-review — Systematic search
citation-management — APA formatting
md-to-word — Document conversion
dissertation-defense — Defense preparation
1---2name: academic-research3description: Research project scaffolding, thesis/dissertation writing, literature reviews, publication workflows, and the AI assistant-assisted academic workflows4---5
6# Academic Research
7
8
9> Complete research lifecycle: project setup, literature review, writing, publication, and defense.
10
11---
12
13## Project Structure
14
15```
16research-project/
17├── .github/
18│ └── copilot-instructions.md # Research context for the AI assistant
19├── docs/
20│ ├── RESEARCH-PLAN.md # Questions, timeline, milestones
21│ ├── METHODOLOGY.md # Design decisions
22│ └── DECISION-LOG.md # Key decisions with rationale
23├── data/
24│ ├── raw/ # Untouched source data
25│ ├── processed/ # Cleaned/transformed
26│ └── DATA-DICTIONARY.md # Variable definitions
27├── analysis/
28│ ├── scripts/ # Analysis code
29│ └── outputs/ # Figures, tables
30├── writing/
31│ ├── drafts/ # Work in progress
32│ └── submissions/ # Submitted versions
33├── references/
34│ ├── LITERATURE-MATRIX.md # Systematic tracking
35│ └── notes/ # Reading notes
36└── README.md
37```
38
39### Quick Setup
40
41```bash
42mkdir -p .github docs data/{raw,processed} analysis/{scripts,outputs} writing/{drafts,submissions} references/notes
43touch docs/RESEARCH-PLAN.md docs/METHODOLOGY.md references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md .github/copilot-instructions.md
44```
45
46---
47
48## Research Project Types
49
50| Type | Duration | Output | Review |
51|------|----------|--------|--------|
52| Master's Thesis | 1-2 years | 80-150 pages | Committee defense |
53| PhD Dissertation | 3-7 years | 150-300+ pages | Committee + external |
54| Journal Article | 3-12 months | 5,000-10,000 words | Peer review |
55| Conference Paper | 2-6 months | 4,000-8,000 words | Peer review |
56
57---
58
59## Research Question Development
60
61### PICO Framework
62
63- **P**opulation — Who is being studied?
64- **I**ntervention — What is being tested?
65- **C**omparison — Against what?
66- **O**utcome — What is measured?
67
68### FINER Criteria
69
70| Criterion | Question |
71|-----------|----------|
72| **F**easible | Can it be done with available resources? |
73| **I**nteresting | Does anyone care? |
74| **N**ovel | Does it add new knowledge? |
75| **E**thical | Can it be done ethically? |
76| **R**elevant | Does it matter to the field? |
77
78---
79
80## Literature Review
81
82### Synthesis Approaches
83
84| Approach | When to Use |
85|----------|-------------|
86| **Thematic** | Organize by concepts across sources |
87| **Chronological** | Show field evolution |
88| **Methodological** | Compare research approaches |
89| **Concept Matrix** | Map concepts to sources in table |
90
91### Gap Types
92
93- **Empirical** — No studies in specific context
94- **Theoretical** — Theory not applied to domain
95- **Methodological** — New methods could reveal insights
96- **Population** — Understudied demographic
97
98### Literature Matrix Template
99
100```markdown
101| Citation | Year | Method | Findings | Gaps | Relevance |
102|----------|------|--------|----------|------|-----------|
103| Author1 et al. | 2024 | RCT | X | Y | ⭐⭐⭐ |
104```
105
106---
107
108## Methodology
109
110### Qualitative Methods
111
112| Method | Best For | Sample |
113|--------|----------|--------|
114| Interviews | Deep understanding | 10-30 |
115| Focus Groups | Group dynamics | 4-8/group |
116| Case Study | Detailed exploration | 1-10 |
117| Grounded Theory | Theory generation | Until saturation |
118
119### Quantitative Methods
120
121| Method | Best For | Sample |
122|--------|----------|--------|
123| Survey | Breadth, generalization | 100-1000+ |
124| Experiment | Causation | Power analysis |
125| Quasi-experiment | No randomization | Varies |
126
127### Mixed Methods
128
129- **Convergent** — Qual + quant simultaneously
130- **Explanatory Sequential** — Quant → Qual
131- **Exploratory Sequential** — Qual → Quant
132
133---
134
135## Thesis/Dissertation Structure
136
1371. **Introduction** — Problem, significance, research questions
1382. **Literature Review** — Framework, prior work, gaps
1393. **Methodology** — Design, collection, analysis
1404. **Results** — Data without interpretation
1415. **Discussion** — Interpret, connect to literature
1426. **Conclusion** — Summary, contributions, limitations
143
144### Discipline Variations
145
146| Discipline | Variation |
147|------------|-----------|
148| Sciences | Methods-heavy |
149| Humanities | Multiple thematic chapters |
150| Social Sciences | Separate theoretical framework |
151| Engineering | Implementation + Evaluation chapters |
152
153---
154
155## Academic Writing
156
157### Hedging Language
158
159| Strong | Hedged |
160|--------|--------|
161| "This proves..." | "This suggests..." |
162| "Always causes" | "May contribute to" |
163| "Definitely shows" | "Evidence indicates" |
164
165### CARS Model (Introductions)
166
1671. **Establish territory** — topic importance
1682. **Establish niche** — gap in knowledge
1693. **Occupy niche** — your contribution
170
171### Citation Density
172
173| Section | Density |
174|---------|---------|
175| Abstract | None |
176| Introduction | Medium |
177| Related Work | High |
178| Methods | Low-Medium |
179| Results | Low |
180| Discussion | Medium |
181
182---
183
184## Publication Workflow
185
186### Venue Selection
187
188| Research Type | Venue |
189|---------------|-------|
190| User study with metrics | ACM CHI |
191| Business implications | Harvard Business Review |
192| Cognitive theory | Cognitive Systems Research |
193| Philosophical AI argument | Minds & Machines |
194
195### 5-Phase Process
196
197| Phase | Duration | Focus |
198|-------|----------|-------|
199| Preparation | 1-2 weeks | Literature, outline, figures |
200| Rough Draft | 1-2 weeks | Write without editing |
201| Revision | 1-2 weeks | Structure → Section → Paragraph → Sentence |
202| Feedback | 2-4 weeks | Advisor, peers |
203| Polish | 1 week | Format, citations, submit |
204
205### Responding to Reviews
206
207```markdown
208## Response to Reviewer 1
209
210### R1.1: "[Concern]"
211
212We appreciate this observation. [How addressed].
213
214Changes: Section X, paragraph Y: [new text]
215```
216
217---
218
219## Committee Navigation
220
221### Defense Preparation
222
2231. Anticipate likely questions
2242. Prepare 20-30 minute presentation
2253. Know your limitations
2264. Have backup slides
2275. Practice with friendly audience
228
229### Common Concerns
230
231| Concern | Address With |
232|---------|--------------|
233| "Why this topic?" | Strong motivation |
234| "What's your contribution?" | Explicit list |
235| "How is this valid?" | Robust methodology |
236| "What about X?" | Scope, future work |
237
238---
239
240## Citation Management
241
242| Style | Discipline |
243|-------|------------|
244| APA 7 | Psychology, social sciences |
245| MLA 9 | Humanities |
246| Chicago | History |
247| IEEE | Engineering, CS |
248| Vancouver | Medicine |
249
250---
251
252## Refactoring Existing Projects
253
254### Audit Checklist
255
256- [ ] Has .github/copilot-instructions.md
257- [ ] Data separated: raw vs processed
258- [ ] Research questions documented
259- [ ] Literature systematically tracked
260- [ ] Methodology decisions recorded
261
262### Migration Pattern
263
264```bash
265git mv old-data.csv data/raw/
266git mv cleaned.csv data/processed/
267git mv draft.docx writing/drafts/paper-v1.docx
268```
269
270---
271
272## File Templates
273
274### RESEARCH-PLAN.md
275
276```markdown
277# Research Plan: [Title]
278
279## Research Questions
2801. Primary: [Main question]
2812. Secondary: [Supporting questions]
282
283## Timeline
284| Phase | Duration | Deliverable |
285|-------|----------|-------------|
286| Literature | Weeks 1-4 | Matrix complete |
287| Collection | Weeks 5-12 | Raw data |
288| Analysis | Weeks 13-16 | Results |
289| Writing | Weeks 17-20 | Draft |
290```
291
292### copilot-instructions.md (Research)
293
294```markdown
295# [Project] - Research Context
296
297## Current Phase
298- [x] Literature Review
299- [ ] Data Collection
300
301## the AI assistant Guidance
302- Add literature to references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md
303- Log decisions in docs/DECISION-LOG.md
304- Citation style: APA 7
305```
306
307---
308
309## Pre-Submission Checklist
310
311- [ ] Abstract stands alone
312- [ ] Contributions stated explicitly
313- [ ] All claims supported
314- [ ] Limitations acknowledged
315- [ ] References complete
316- [ ] Word limit respected
317- [ ] Anonymized if required
318
319---
320
321## Tools
322
323| Tool | Purpose |
324|------|---------|
325| Zotero | Reference management |
326| Overleaf | LaTeX collaboration |
327| Connected Papers | Literature discovery |
328| Pandoc | Markdown to Word/PDF |
329
330---
331
332## Related Skills
333
334- `literature-review` — Systematic search
335- `citation-management` — APA formatting
336- `md-to-word` — Document conversion
337- `dissertation-defense` — Defense preparation