AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It tells you which aejmic- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for microeconomic THEORY and its applications: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is theory-first — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process (vs. specialist JET / GEB / Theoretical Economics); it is less abstract/methodological than TE or Econometrica; and it is theory, not empirical applied micro (that is AEJ: Applied). Process tells: single-blind review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a submission fee (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see resources/official-source-map.md).
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
- Work is ping-ponging between the model, the proofs, the framing, and the response letter
- An AEJ: Micro decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom |
Next skill |
| Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied) |
aejmic-topic-selection |
| Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversold |
aejmic-literature-positioning |
| The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck |
aejmic-theory-model |
| Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the work |
aejmic-identification |
| Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missing |
aejmic-robustness |
| Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messy |
aejmic-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not land |
aejmic-writing-style |
| Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, README |
aejmic-replication-package |
| Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject odds |
aejmic-referee-strategy |
| Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflight |
aejmic-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy |
aejmic-rebuttal |
Default order
aejmic-topic-selection — lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory question
aejmic-literature-positioning — stake the result against the closest theorem
aejmic-theory-model — the central skill: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategy
aejmic-identification — what makes the result tight / what identifies parameters
aejmic-robustness — extensions, edge cases, applied robustness
aejmic-tables-figures — propositions, numerical examples, experimental tables
aejmic-writing-style — make the result land (abstract + intro last)
aejmic-replication-package — proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)
aejmic-referee-strategy — pre-empt the objections theory referees raise
aejmic-submission — AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)
aejmic-rebuttal — after the R&R
aejmic-writing-style is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.
Anti-patterns
- Polishing prose or exhibits while the model or main proof is still moving —
aejmic-theory-model must settle first
- Treating AEJ: Micro like JET/GEB (specialist, maximal generality) or AEJ: Applied (empirical) — wrong fit gate
- Deferring the proof appendix and any numerical/experimental code until acceptance — the AEA Data Editor checks before publication
- Reporting an applied result with significance asterisks instead of standard errors
Routing by paper archetype
AEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype |
Likely first bottleneck |
Enter at |
| pure theory (mechanism/game/decision) |
equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generality |
aejmic-theory-model |
| theory with structural estimation |
parameter identification + counterfactual validity |
aejmic-identification → aejmic-theory-model |
| theory-grounded experiment |
design maps to the model's prediction; pre-registration |
aejmic-topic-selection → aejmic-identification |
| IO theory / applied micro-theory |
the mechanism's robustness to modeling choices |
aejmic-theory-model → aejmic-robustness |
Worked routing example (illustrative)
A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — which assumption is doing the work (owned by aejmic-identification) and does the mechanism extend (owned by aejmic-robustness), both anchored to aejmic-theory-model. Route to aejmic-theory-model to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then aejmic-robustness for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to aejmic-tables-figures and aejmic-rebuttal.
Minimal decision snippet
if decision_letter_arrived: -> aejmic-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit: -> aejmic-submission
elif anticipating_referees: -> aejmic-referee-strategy
elif proof_appendix_or_code: -> aejmic-replication-package
elif prose_or_intro: -> aejmic-writing-style
elif exhibits_or_examples: -> aejmic-tables-figures
elif extensions_or_edge_cases: -> aejmic-robustness
elif which_assumption_or_id: -> aejmic-identification
elif model_or_proof_unsettled: -> aejmic-theory-model
elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning
else: -> aejmic-topic-selection
1---2name: aejmic-workflow3description: AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)4---56# AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)78## Overview910This is the router. It tells you **which aejmic-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at the *American Economic Journal: Microeconomics* (AEJ: Micro) — the **American Economic Association's** quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for **microeconomic THEORY and its applications**: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is **theory-first** — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.1112Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants **broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process** (vs. specialist *JET* / *GEB* / *Theoretical Economics*); it is **less abstract/methodological** than *TE* or *Econometrica*; and it is **theory**, not empirical applied micro (that is *AEJ: Applied*). Process tells: **single-blind** review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a **submission fee** (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the **AEA Data and Code Availability Policy** for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see `resources/official-source-map.md`).1314## When to trigger1516- The user asks "what should I do next?"17- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed18- Work is ping-ponging between the model, the proofs, the framing, and the response letter19- An AEJ: Micro decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode2021## Routing table2223| Current symptom | Next skill |24|-----------------|------------|25| Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied) | `aejmic-topic-selection` |26| Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversold | `aejmic-literature-positioning` |27| The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck | `aejmic-theory-model` |28| Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the work | `aejmic-identification` |29| Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missing | `aejmic-robustness` |30| Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messy | `aejmic-tables-figures` |31| Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not land | `aejmic-writing-style` |32| Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, README | `aejmic-replication-package` |33| Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject odds | `aejmic-referee-strategy` |34| Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflight | `aejmic-submission` |35| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | `aejmic-rebuttal` |3637## Default order38391. `aejmic-topic-selection` — lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory question402. `aejmic-literature-positioning` — stake the result against the closest theorem413. `aejmic-theory-model` — **the central skill**: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategy424. `aejmic-identification` — what makes the result tight / what identifies parameters435. `aejmic-robustness` — extensions, edge cases, applied robustness446. `aejmic-tables-figures` — propositions, numerical examples, experimental tables457. `aejmic-writing-style` — make the result land (abstract + intro last)468. `aejmic-replication-package` — proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)479. `aejmic-referee-strategy` — pre-empt the objections theory referees raise4810. `aejmic-submission` — AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)4911. `aejmic-rebuttal` — after the R&R5051> `aejmic-writing-style` is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.5253## Anti-patterns5455- Polishing prose or exhibits while the **model or main proof is still moving** — `aejmic-theory-model` must settle first56- Treating AEJ: Micro like *JET*/*GEB* (specialist, maximal generality) or *AEJ: Applied* (empirical) — wrong fit gate57- Deferring the **proof appendix** and any **numerical/experimental code** until acceptance — the AEA Data Editor checks before publication58- Reporting an applied result with significance asterisks instead of standard errors5960## Routing by paper archetype6162AEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.6364| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |65|-----------|-------------------------|----------|66| pure theory (mechanism/game/decision) | equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generality | `aejmic-theory-model` |67| theory with structural estimation | parameter identification + counterfactual validity | `aejmic-identification` → `aejmic-theory-model` |68| theory-grounded experiment | design maps to the model's prediction; pre-registration | `aejmic-topic-selection` → `aejmic-identification` |69| IO theory / applied micro-theory | the mechanism's robustness to modeling choices | `aejmic-theory-model` → `aejmic-robustness` |7071## Worked routing example (illustrative)7273A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — *which assumption is doing the work* (owned by `aejmic-identification`) and *does the mechanism extend* (owned by `aejmic-robustness`), both anchored to `aejmic-theory-model`. Route to `aejmic-theory-model` to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then `aejmic-robustness` for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to `aejmic-tables-figures` and `aejmic-rebuttal`.7475## Minimal decision snippet7677```78if decision_letter_arrived: -> aejmic-rebuttal79elif ready_to_submit: -> aejmic-submission80elif anticipating_referees: -> aejmic-referee-strategy81elif proof_appendix_or_code: -> aejmic-replication-package82elif prose_or_intro: -> aejmic-writing-style83elif exhibits_or_examples: -> aejmic-tables-figures84elif extensions_or_edge_cases: -> aejmic-robustness85elif which_assumption_or_id: -> aejmic-identification86elif model_or_proof_unsettled: -> aejmic-theory-model87elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning88else: -> aejmic-topic-selection89```