Boltz Structure Prediction

Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 Structure Prediction

Plain-language role: Use Boltz when you want an open-source structure predictor for protein or protein-ligand validation.

Prerequisites

How to run

First time? See Installation Guide to set up Modal and biomodals.

Option 1: Modal

cd biomodals
modal run modal_boltz.py \
  --input-faa complex.fasta \
  --out-dir predictions/

GPU: L40S (48GB) | Timeout: 1800s default

Option 2: Local installation

pip install boltz-structure-prediction

boltz-structure-prediction predict \
  --fasta complex.fasta \
  --output predictions/

Key parameters

FASTA Format

>protein_A
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVK...
>protein_B
MVLSPADKTNVKAAWG...

Output format

predictions/
├── model_0.cif       # Best model (CIF format)
├── confidence.json   # pLDDT, pTM, ipTM
└── pae.npy          # PAE matrix

Note: Boltz outputs CIF format. Convert to PDB if needed:

from Bio.PDB import MMCIFParser, PDBIO
parser = MMCIFParser()
structure = parser.get_structure("model", "model_0.cif")
io = PDBIO()
io.set_structure(structure)
io.save("model_0.pdb")

Comparison

Sample output

Successful run

$ boltz-structure-prediction predict --fasta complex.fasta --output predictions/
[INFO] Loading Boltz-1 weights...
[INFO] Predicting structure...
[INFO] Saved model to predictions/model_0.cif

predictions/confidence.json:
{
  "ptm": 0.78,
  "iptm": 0.65,
  "plddt": 0.81
}

What good output looks like:

• pTM: > 0.7 (confident global structure)
• ipTM: > 0.5 (confident interface)
• pLDDT: > 0.7 (confident per-residue)
• CIF file: ~100-500 KB for typical complex

Decision tree

Should I use Boltz?
│
├─ What are you predicting?
│  ├─ Protein-protein complex → Boltz ✓ or Chai or ColabFold
│  ├─ Protein + ligand → Boltz ✓ or Chai
│  └─ Single protein → Use ESMFold (faster)
│
├─ Need MSA?
│  ├─ No / want speed → Boltz ✓
│  └─ Yes / maximum accuracy → ColabFold
│
└─ Why Boltz over Chai?
   ├─ Open weights preference → Boltz ✓
   ├─ Boltz-2 speed → Boltz ✓
   └─ DNA/RNA support → Consider Chai

Typical performance

Per-complex: ~15-30s for typical binder-target complex.

Verify

find predictions -name "*.cif" | wc -l  # Should match input count

Troubleshooting

Low confidence: Increase recycling_steps OOM errors: Use MSA-free mode or A100-80GB Slow prediction: Reduce sampling_steps

Error interpretation

Boltz-1 vs Boltz-2

Next: protein-design-qc for filtering and ranking.

Inputs

• Protein or complex sequences, optionally with ligands or cofactors depending on the prediction task.
• A chosen Boltz model version, runtime settings, and output directory.
• GPU-enabled environment or Modal configuration for prediction runs.

Outputs

• Predicted structures and confidence artifacts for each sampled model.
• Confidence metrics suitable for downstream QC, including interface-aware scores on complexes.
• A ranked set of validation structures for design triage.

Next Step

Filter the resulting predictions with protein-design-qc and compare top candidates against chai1-structure-prediction or alphafold2-multimer when needed.