Experience Lwc Design Generate

Creating LWC Components from Design

Orchestrate the end-to-end creation of a new Lightning Web Component from a design input (Figma, PRD, Aura source, or user description). This is the top-level workflow skill — it sequences the specialized sibling skills that own each stage. Org-aware data (LDS schema introspection, design-frame inspection) is resolved by handing off to experience-lds-data-requirements-generate or via design-tool URLs the user provides.

When to Use

• Building a brand-new LWC from a Figma frame, PRD, or written spec.
• Migrating an Aura component to LWC as a fresh build (in-place Aura → LWC porting is out of scope for this skill).
• Creating a component whose requirements are still partly implicit and need distillation into a PRD before coding.

Do NOT use this skill for:

• Refactoring an existing LWC (use experience-lwc-generate).
• Aura → LWC in-place migration (out of scope for this skill).
• Pure styling or data-layer work (use the specialized skills directly).

Prerequisites

• At least one design input: Figma URL, PRD markdown, Aura component source, or a textual spec.
• Target path (module folder) for the new LWC.
• For data-backed components: access to the org so experience-lds-data-requirements-generate and experience-lds-best-practices-apply can resolve the schema and adapter shapes.

Knowledge Bases

• references/prd-analysis-template.md — PRD section skeleton (copy it verbatim when producing a PRD).
• references/figma-to-prd-blueprint.md — Figma-specific guidance for translating a frame into PRD sections (componentName/tagName, contentRequirements, dataRequirements, interactions, componentCommunication, states, accessibility/responsiveness/styling/localization/security). Read this before Phase 1.2 when the input is a Figma design.

Workflow (mandatory five phases)

Phase 1 — Gather PRD & requirements

Goal: produce a consolidated PRD that every later phase consumes.

1. Obtain raw requirements — collect the PRD, design spec, Figma URL, Aura source, or user text.

2. Figma → PRD (if applicable): follow references/figma-to-prd-blueprint.md for the full Figma-frame analysis and PRD section guidelines. Inputs you need from the user: the Figma URL, a screenshot of the target frame, and (if Dev Mode is available) the metadata export for the node. Translate into the PRD skeleton from references/prd-analysis-template.md using the section-by-section guidance in the blueprint.

3. Aura → PRD (if migrating): enumerate the Aura component's functionality that must be preserved — markup, controller/helper actions, events, attributes, and wired data — and feed that inventory into the PRD as explicit requirements. (In-place Aura → LWC porting is out of scope; this step only captures behavior for a fresh build.)

4. Data requirements (if the component reads/writes data): hand off to experience-lds-data-requirements-generate. That skill produces a validated data specification (object/field API names, recommended LDS API, implementation approach). Paste its output verbatim into the PRD.

5. Adapter exploration: hand off to experience-lds-best-practices-apply for the adapter selection rules (UI API vs GraphQL vs Apex) and the recommended wiring for the chosen approach.

6. Naming: componentName must be camelCase (e.g., productCard) and tagName must be its kebab-case form (e.g., product-card). Validate both with the bundled script — do not eyeball the check:

   "<skill_dir>/scripts/check-component-name.sh" <componentName> <tagName>
   

   The script exits nonzero (with an actionable stderr message) if either name is malformed or if the kebab form of componentName does not equal tagName.

Deliverable: a comprehensive PRD covering purpose, content, data, interactions, states, a11y, responsiveness, styling direction, localization, and security. Keep it checked into the workspace (e.g., packages/skills/<skill>-workspace/<iteration>/PRD.md).

Phase 2 — Generate component code

Goal: initial .html, .js, .css, .js-meta.xml that strictly reflect the PRD.

1. Hand off to experience-lwc-generate with the PRD content as the spec. That skill owns PRD → code translation (events, getters, @api, .js-meta.xml, AI metadata) and is the authoring source of truth.
2. Use the SLDS decision hierarchy from design-systems-slds-apply:
   1. Prefer a matching Lightning Base Component (experience-lwc-base-components-integrate).
   2. Otherwise pick an SLDS Blueprint or utility class (per design-systems-slds-apply).
   3. Otherwise write custom CSS using SLDS styling hooks (also covered in design-systems-slds-apply).
3. Re-confirm the authoring baseline by walking the experience-lwc-generate checklist before proceeding.
4. Translate every PRD data requirement to either a wire adapter (UIAPI / GraphQL) or an explicit TODO.
5. Adhere strictly to the PRD:
   • Only include features and behaviors the PRD describes.
   • Mark uncertain areas with // TODO: comments that quote the PRD language raising the ambiguity.
   • Add extensive code comments explaining intent.
   • Do not split the component into more sub-components than the PRD implies.

Deliverable: a first-pass LWC bundle in the target path.

Phase 3 — Optimize component

Goal: apply performance, maintainability, and best-practice fixes.

1. Walk the optimization checklist below before any other review:
   • Single responsibility, encapsulation, reusability.
   • Minimize DOM operations; batch updates via properties.
   • Audit event handlers and lifecycle hook usage (renderedCallback guards).
   • Consider lazy loading for heavy children.
2. Hand off to experience-lwc-generate for the LWC best-practices review pass (anti-patterns, reactivity, composition).
3. Hand off to the compliance suite for the pre-ship review — experience-accessibility-validate (a11y), experience-lwc-security-validate (LWS + Product Security), and experience-lwc-rtl-validate (RTL i18n). Run them together for the full quality pass.
4. If the component touches data, hand off to experience-lds-best-practices-apply for cache/consistency and referential-integrity checks.
5. Apply every accepted finding. Keep the PRD as the source of truth — do not add scope under the guise of optimization.

Phase 4 — Lint, format, compile-check

Condition: only run steps whose tooling is configured in the project.

1. Detect project tooling — invoke the bundled detection script from the project root and read its <tool>=yes|no lines. Do NOT eyeball package.json / dotfiles in prose:

   "<skill_dir>/scripts/detect-project-tools.sh" <projectRoot>
   

   Sample output:

   eslint=yes
   prettier=yes
   cursor-rules=no
   lwc-compiler=yes
   

   Run the substeps below only for tools reported yes; skip the rest.

2. ESLint (if eslint=yes) — run and fix all violations.

3. Prettier (if prettier=yes) — run for consistent formatting.

4. Cursor rules (if cursor-rules=yes) — apply every rule the project ships.

5. LWC compiler (if lwc-compiler=yes) — run via local dev server or SFDX; resolve every syntax/template error before moving on.

Deliverable: clean, validated component code.

Phase 5 — Create tests

Hand off to experience-lwc-accessibility-jest-run for automated accessibility Jest coverage; add general-purpose Jest coverage in the same pass following the experience-lwc-generate test guidance, plus UTAM page object generation if the team requires it.

Deliverable: the LWC bundle with a passing test suite at or above the project's coverage threshold.

Definition of Done

A new component built from this workflow is "done" only when every item below is true. Treat this as the canonical readiness checklist — copy it into the PR description so reviewers can confirm each line.

Code completion — no implementation gaps:

1. Every PRD requirement is either implemented or explicitly annotated with a TODO: and a linked tracking item. No silent gaps.
2. No TODO, FIXME, or console.log / console.table / alert() left in production paths.
3. No commented-out code blocks, no empty function bodies, no placeholder values, no dummy data, no unreferenced imports.
4. No lwc:dom="manual" regions or third-party-library escape hatches without a comment explaining why a native LWC pattern wasn't used.

Compliance and quality:

5. .js-meta.xml AI metadata passes the audit in experience-lwc-generate (component-wide <ai><description> set, plus an <ai><property name="…" aiDescription="…"/></ai> entry for every @api member exposed through <targetConfig>; no marketing language).
6. SLDS styling passes design-systems-slds-apply verification — no raw hex / px values, only styling hooks and SLDS utility classes.
7. Accessibility pass complete: experience-accessibility-validate for source review + experience-lwc-accessibility-jest-run for automated tests, both green.
8. Security + RTL pass complete: experience-lwc-security-validate + experience-lwc-rtl-validate, both green.

Data + tests:

9. Data layer verified against the referenced LDS adapters (every wire / imperative call is documented in the PRD's data section and matches one of the adapters from experience-lds-best-practices-apply or experience-lds-data-requirements-generate).
10. Jest tests green at the required coverage level for the project. New tests cover every @api surface, every dispatched event, and every error path (failed wire, failed apex, validation rejection).
11. UTAM page objects produced for any UI flow that needs cross-component browser-level testing (skip if not needed).

Cross-References

• Skills chained by this workflow (in phase order):
  • experience-lds-data-requirements-generate — Phase 1.4 data spec (and Phase 1.5 adapter exploration alongside experience-lds-best-practices-apply).
  • design-systems-slds-apply, experience-lwc-base-components-integrate — Phase 2 styling decisions.
  • experience-lwc-generate — Phase 2 authoring baseline + Phase 3 best-practices review + Phase 5 AI-metadata audit.
  • experience-lds-best-practices-apply — Phase 2/3 data-layer adapter selection and consistency review.
  • experience-accessibility-validate, experience-lwc-security-validate, experience-lwc-rtl-validate — Phase 3 a11y/security/RTL review.
  • experience-lwc-accessibility-jest-run — Phase 5 automated a11y test generation.
  • Optional: add o11y instrumentation as a separate pass once the component stabilizes.
  • experience-lwc-typescript-migrate — optional once JS is green.
  • When the new component ships behind a flag, gate it with a feature flag during rollout.
  • experience-lwc-api-docs-generate — once the public API surface is stable.
• Org-aware inputs used by this workflow:
  • Figma URL + screenshot (and, if available, the developer's Dev Mode metadata export) — Phase 1.2 Figma input.
  • experience-lds-data-requirements-generate owns the org-schema introspection and data-spec validation used in Phase 1 when the component needs org-backed data — hand off to that skill rather than duplicating its work here.

Examples

Phase 1 PRD skeleton (fill from the Figma/PRD/Aura input)

Component: productCard (<product-card>)
Purpose: Render a compact summary of a product with quick actions.

Content requirements
- Hero image (Product.HeroImage__c)
- Title (Product.Name)
- Subtitle (Product.Tagline__c)
- Primary CTA button ("Add to cart")
- Secondary CTA icon button ("Favorite")

Data requirements
- Input: @api recordId (Product Id)
- Adapter: getRecord (UIAPI) with fields Name, Tagline__c, HeroImage__c
- Events out: addtocart{detail.recordId}, favorite{detail.recordId, detail.value}

States
- Loading (data not yet resolved)
- Error (adapter error)
- Empty (no record found)
- Default

Accessibility
- Title uses <h3>
- Icon-only button carries aria-label="Favorite"
- Card is a labelled region (role="group", aria-labelledby)

Responsiveness
- Full width < 480px
- Side-by-side image + text >= 480px

Styling
- Uses lightning-card wrapper
- Surface color: --slds-g-color-surface-container-1
- Shadow: --slds-g-shadow-1

Phase 2 skeleton

import { LightningElement, api, wire } from 'lwc';
import { getRecord } from 'lightning/uiRecordApi';
import NAME from '@salesforce/schema/Product__c.Name';
import TAGLINE from '@salesforce/schema/Product__c.Tagline__c';
import HERO from '@salesforce/schema/Product__c.HeroImage__c';

const FIELDS = [NAME, TAGLINE, HERO];

export default class ProductCard extends LightningElement {
    @api recordId;

    @wire(getRecord, { recordId: '$recordId', fields: FIELDS })
    record;

    get hasRecord() { return this.record?.data != null; }
    get isLoading() { return !this.record; }
    get hasError()  { return !!this.record?.error; }
    get name()      { return this.record?.data?.fields?.Name?.value ?? ''; }
    get tagline()   { return this.record?.data?.fields?.Tagline__c?.value ?? ''; }
    get heroUrl()   { return this.record?.data?.fields?.HeroImage__c?.value ?? ''; }

    handleAddToCart() {
        this.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('addtocart', { detail: { recordId: this.recordId }, bubbles: true, composed: true }));
    }
    handleFavorite(event) {
        this.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('favorite', { detail: { recordId: this.recordId, value: event.detail.value }, bubbles: true, composed: true }));
    }
}

Verification

• Every PRD section is traceable to at least one block of code or an explicit TODO.
• Phases 1–5 were executed in order; no step was skipped.
• Accessibility, SLDS, data-layer, and AI metadata reviews all pass.
• Coverage meets or exceeds the project's threshold.
• The component renders correctly in experience-lwc-runtime-observe across the responsive breakpoints enumerated in the PRD.