Kayba Stage 2 Domain Context

Stage 2: Domain Context Gathering

Understand the agent's world — what it does, what tools it has, and what "success" looks like.

Inputs

• TRACES_FOLDER — path to directory containing trace JSON files

Process

0. Detect trace format

Before reading traces, identify the framework that produced them. Read 1 trace file and check:

Record the detected format in the output under Trace Format. All subsequent trace-reading steps use the field paths appropriate for that format.

If the format is unrecognized, note the top-level keys and structure, then proceed best-effort with field names found in the data.

1. Detect architecture

Read 2-3 traces and determine if this is a single-agent or multi-agent system:

• Single agent: one agent_info entry, one conversation thread, tool calls from one identity
• Multi-agent / router: look for multiple agent_info entries, routing tool calls (e.g., transfer_to_*, delegate_to_*), sub-conversation arrays, or distinct system prompts per agent identity

If multi-agent: document each agent separately (name, role, tools, handoff triggers) and note the routing logic. The remaining steps apply per-agent.

2. Find the system prompt

Use a fallback chain — stop at the first hit:

1. Config files — grep for keys: system_prompt, system_message, instructions, AGENT_INSTRUCTION, SYSTEM_PROMPT in YAML/JSON/TOML/Python/JS files
2. Source code — search for prompt template strings, f-strings, or .format() calls that build the system message (look in agent implementation files)
3. Trace extraction — read 3 trace files from {TRACES_FOLDER}:
   • Check info.environment_info.policy (tau2-bench format)
   • Check first message with role: "system" in the messages array
   • Check raw_data fields for system-level content
4. Not found — if none of the above yields a system prompt, explicitly record SYSTEM_PROMPT_STATUS: NOT_FOUND in the output and flag this for the orchestrator. Do not fabricate or guess.

When found, record both the prompt content and its source location (file path + line, or trace field path).

3. Extract tool definitions

Two-pass approach: source code first (ground truth), then traces (usage evidence).

Pass 1 — Source code discovery:

• Search for tool/function definition patterns: @tool, @is_tool, def tool_, function schema arrays, OpenAPI specs, tools=[] arguments
• For each tool, extract from source:
  • Name
  • Input parameters with types and defaults
  • Return type / output schema (document the structure, not just "returns a dict")
  • Side effects: READ (no state change), WRITE (mutates state), GENERIC (neither)
  • Validation rules the tool does NOT enforce (critical — grep for comments like "API does not check", "agent must enforce")

Pass 2 — Trace usage evidence:

• Read ALL traces (if <= 20) or a stratified sample (see step 4 for sampling)
• Extract every unique tool_calls[].name from assistant messages
• Extract every role: "tool" response to document actual output shapes
• For each tool, record one example input/output pair from traces

Reconcile the two passes:

• Tools in source but NOT in traces = "available but unused" — flag these; they may be relevant for edge cases the agent should handle
• Tools in traces but NOT in source = possible dynamic tools or external APIs — investigate

Output the full tool inventory as a table with columns: Name, Category, Input Schema, Output Schema, Observed in Traces (Y/N), Unvalidated Rules.

4. Find domain documentation

• READMEs, product docs, wiki links
• Policy files (e.g., data/*/policy.md, domain-specific docs)
• Inline code comments explaining business logic
• Test files that describe expected behavior
• Anything that explains what the agent does and what "success" means for its users

5. Catalogue agent behavior patterns

Trace selection — stratified sampling (do not just grab "5-10 random traces"):

1. Count total traces in {TRACES_FOLDER}. If <= 20, read ALL of them.
2. If > 20, select a stratified sample:
   • Sort by termination_reason — include at least 2 per unique reason
   • Sort by conversation length (message count) — include shortest, longest, and 2 median
   • Sort by tool call count — include lowest and highest
   • If task outcomes are available (pass/fail), include at least 3 of each
   • Target: ~15 traces total, or 30% of the corpus, whichever is larger

For each selected trace, document:

• Function call frequency — which tools are called most, in what order
• Tool call sequences — common tool chains (e.g., get_user -> get_reservation -> cancel)
• Success patterns — what does a thread that accomplishes its goal look like?
• Failure patterns — what does a thread that fails or gets stuck look like?
• Error patterns — what error strings appear in tool outputs? Group by root cause
• Policy violation patterns — where does the agent break its own rules? (e.g., multiple tool calls per turn, acting without confirmation)
• User feedback signals — reverts, ratings, explicit corrections, escalations, stop tokens, transfer tokens

6. Write findings

Write all findings to eval/stage2_domain_context.md:

# Domain Context

## Trace Format
- Framework: [detected framework name]
- Key field paths: [e.g., simulation.messages[], info.environment_info.policy]

## Architecture
- Type: [single-agent | multi-agent]
- [If multi-agent: agent roster with roles and handoff triggers]

## Agent Purpose
[1-2 sentence summary of what this agent does]

## System Prompt
- **Source**: [file path + line, or trace field path, or NOT_FOUND]
- **Status**: [verbatim | reconstructed | not_found]

[The system prompt content, or "NOT_FOUND — downstream stages should account for missing system prompt"]

## Tools
| Tool | Category | Input Schema | Output Schema | In Traces? | Unvalidated Rules |
|------|----------|-------------|---------------|------------|-------------------|
| tool_name | READ/WRITE/GENERIC | `{param: type}` | `{field: type}` | Y/N | "API does not check X" |

### Tools available but never called in traces
- [tool_name — why it matters]

## Domain Rules
[Key business rules, constraints, policies the agent must follow]

## Behavior Patterns

### Success patterns
- [pattern 1]

### Failure patterns
- [pattern 1]

### Policy violation patterns
- [violation with frequency: N/M turns]

### Error patterns
| Error | Frequency | Root cause |
|-------|-----------|------------|
| error string | N traces | cause |

### User feedback signals
- [signal 1]

Outputs

• eval/stage2_domain_context.md