Load Pr Comments

Load Unresolved PR Review Comments as Parallel Tasks

Load ONLY open/UNRESOLVED PR review threads and rewrite them into grouped markdown task files under .specs/comments/*.md, each safe for a separate parallel agent to implement with no overlap.

Critical Guidelines

• You MUST load ONLY threads where the resolved state is false. Skip resolved threads.
• You MUST rewrite each comment as an actionable TASK requirement, not a summary. Preserve substance (code suggestions, exact instructions) verbatim.
• You MUST NOT post, reply to, or modify anything on GitHub. This skill is read-only against the API.
• You MUST group comments so each file is independently implementable with NO duplication across files.

Step 0: Verify what tools are available

1. Check if GitHub CLI is installed and authenticated:

   gh auth status
   

2. Check if the GitHub MCP server is available:

   mcp__MCP_DOCKER__pull_request_read
   

   or simular command without MCP_DOCKER prefix, if installed directly.

• if both are available, use any that have enough accesses to the repository.
• if github mcp server avaiable but have different structure, adjust in order to fit the expected structure.
• if none is available, try to load directly through curl in case if it is public repository. If it is private, ask user to install GitHub CLI or GitHub MCP server.
• if MCP server not installed, but github cli is installed, but not authenticated, ask user to run gh auth login to authenticate.

Step 1: Resolve the Target PR

• An explicit PR argument ALWAYS takes precedence over current-branch resolution. If a PR number or URL was passed, use it (a URL like https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/{n} → number {n}) and do NOT consult the current branch.
• Otherwise default to the PR of the CURRENT branch:

gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName   # current branch's PR

• Resolve repo owner/name: gh repo view --json owner,name.
• If no PR exists for the branch, gh pr view errors with "no pull requests found" — STOP and report that no PR is associated with the branch (ask for a PR number/URL).

Step 2: Retrieve UNRESOLVED Comments

Resolved/unresolved is a GraphQL reviewThreads { isResolved } concept — the REST /pulls/{n}/comments endpoint does NOT expose it. Use one of the two approaches below; if the primary is unavailable, fall back to the other.

Primary: gh CLI (GraphQL)

Filter isResolved == false directly in the jq:

gh api graphql -f query='
query($owner:String!,$repo:String!,$pr:Int!){
  repository(owner:$owner,name:$repo){
    pullRequest(number:$pr){
      reviewThreads(first:100){
        nodes {
          isResolved
          isOutdated
          path
          line
          startLine
          originalLine
          comments(first:50){
            nodes { author{login} body diffHunk url }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}' -F owner=OWNER -F repo=REPO -F pr=PR_NUMBER \
  --jq '[.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[]
         | select(.isResolved==false)
         | {path, isOutdated,
            line: (.line // .startLine // .originalLine),
            comments: [.comments.nodes[]
             | {author: .author.login, url, body, diffHunk}]}]'

This returns each unresolved thread with its file path, an isOutdated flag, a usable line, and ordered comments (author, body, permalink url, diffHunk).

IMPORTANT: For OUTDATED threads line is null (the diff moved). The jq above already falls back line // startLine // originalLine, so line is never null when any anchor exists. When ALL three are null, omit the :<line> segment entirely in the template — never render path:null.

Fallback: GitHub MCP

If the GitHub MCP server (MCP_DOCKER) is available, use the mcp__MCP_DOCKER__pull_request_read tool with method: "get_review_comments":

mcp__MCP_DOCKER__pull_request_read
  method: "get_review_comments"
  owner: "OWNER"
  repo: "REPO"
  pullNumber: PR_NUMBER
  perPage: 100

It returns review_threads[], each with is_resolved, is_outdated, is_collapsed (all snake_case — verified against this tool's response) and comments[] (body, path, author, html_url). Keep only threads where is_resolved is false. Note the MCP comment objects expose path but NOT a line number, so use the html_url as the location anchor. Paginate with after: <endCursor> while pageInfo.hasNextPage is true.

Step 3: Group and Rewrite as Tasks

Convert unresolved threads into focused task files for parallel agents.

Deduplicate FIRST (before grouping): if two or more threads request the same change at the same path (and same/overlapping line), or carry an identical suggested fix, collapse them into ONE requirement. Do not emit a separate line item per duplicate thread — this matters most in the nitpick file where repeated trivial suggestions cluster.

Rewrite rules per thread:

• Drop conversation framing and author names. Output a task, not a transcript.
• If a HUMAN reviewer left feedback, write THAT as the requirement.
• If only a bot/AI suggestion exists (Claude, CodeRabbit, Copilot, etc.), write that fix suggestion as the requirement.
• Preserve substance — do NOT summarize away code blocks, suggested diffs, or exact wording.
• Add context: a short issue description and a link to the file/line (the comment url/html_url, plus path:line) when available. If line is null (outdated/unanchorable thread), write just path with no :line segment and note it is outdated.

Before/after (lock in "rewrite as task, do not summarize"):

• Raw thread (bot): "commands is incorrect, real commands is more like /add-task /plan-task /implement-task"
• Task requirement: "- [ ] Replace the listed commands with the correct ones: /add-task, /plan-task, /implement-task" (suggestion preserved verbatim, conversation framing dropped — NOT "fix the commands").

Grouping rules:

• Group by file or by functionality so two agents never touch the same area → NO conflicts, NO duplicated work.
• Do NOT duplicate a comment across files.
• Aggregate nitpicks / trivial one-line changes into ONE combined file (e.g. nitpicks.md).
• Cap at ≤5 files total. Do NOT over-combine unrelated changes — each file must be a single, focused, independently-implementable unit of work.

Step 4: .gitignore Handling

Ensure generated comment files are ignored. This is idempotent: it appends the entry only if missing, and >> CREATES .gitignore if it does not exist.

grep -qF '.specs/comments/*.md' .gitignore 2>/dev/null || printf '\n.specs/comments/*.md\n' >> .gitignore

Step 5: Write Files

mkdir -p .specs/comments

Write each group as .specs/comments/<kebab-topic>.md using this template:

# Tasks: <focused topic, e.g. Fix incorrect command names in README-zh>

## <Topic 1>

File: `<path>:<line>` (omit `:<line>` when line is null; append " (outdated)" if isOutdated)
<Issue description for the change>

### Requirements

- [ ] <Reviewer requirement or bot fix suggestion, substance preserved>
- [ ] <Next requirement in this topic>

## <Topic 2>

File: `<path>:<line>` 
<Issue description for the change>

### Requirements

- [ ] <Reviewer requirement or bot fix suggestion, substance preserved>
- [ ] <Next requirement in this topic>

Step 6: Report

Summarize: target PR (number + url), count of unresolved threads loaded, files created with their topics, and any threads skipped (resolved) or limitations hit (e.g. MCP unavailable).

Edge Cases