Executor Runtime Readiness
This is a Hermes-native executor-runtime-readiness workflow skill.
Why This Exists
executor-runtime-readiness exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.
Do Not Use When
- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: executor-runtime-readiness can this task run in Codex, Claude Code, or Hermes coding?
- Expected behavior: Produce
prepare_executor_runtime_readiness with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.
Bad example:
- Prompt: executor-runtime-readiness claim Codex already started the session.
- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
Completion Checklist
- The selected coding or runtime owner is named before any implementation claim.
- Prepared handoff, dispatch, execution, verification, review, CI, and merge states are separated.
- The final status cites observed runtime evidence or keeps the work prepared_not_observed.
- When Hermes is the selected coding owner, use
hermes_coding_harness/v1 to keep builder, verifier, reviewer, docs, and PR lanes separate.
- Report the current harness stage, owner, next action, and missing evidence without claiming PR creation, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge until matching runtime observations exist.
Recovery Notes
- If the selected executor is unavailable, ask for Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or another runtime before retrying.
- If dispatch or result evidence is missing, keep the handoff prepared_not_observed and expose the next observable action.
Workflow Lane
- Current lane: Coding handoff (
idea-to-deploy, llm-app-dev, cto-loop, deploy-and-monitor, code-review, build-failure-triage, verification-gate, security-safety-review, +13 more) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to
oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules:
omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.
Use When
Use when a user may choose Codex, Claude Code, Hermes coding, or another runtime and needs tool/credential gaps before handoff.
Strong routing signals: `executor-runtime-readiness`, `executor readiness`, `runtime readiness`, `codex readiness`, `claude code readiness`, `hermes coding readiness`, `executor tools`, `missing tools`, `missing runtime tools`, `runtime tools`, `coding agent readiness`, `coding runtime`, `handoff mode`, `handoff readiness`, `codex or claude`, `codex vs claude`, `codex tools`, `claude code tools`, `hermes coding`, `agent runtime`, `subagent readiness`, `worktree readiness`, `runtime migration`, `omx`, `omc`, `omo`, `codex로 넘길지 claude`, `claude code로 넘길지 codex`, `codex랑 claude`, `claude code 중`, `넘길지 codex`, `넘길지 claude`, `코덱스`, `클로드 코드`, `헤르메스 코딩`, `코딩 에이전트`, `서브에이전트`, `작업트리`, `준비성`, `실행 런타임`, `어떤 런타임`, `런타임으로 넘겨`
Catalog Metadata
Category: executor-readiness
Phase: runtime-selection
Hermes role: handoff-guide
Quality tier: workflow-surface-gated
Reasoning demand: light
Quality bar:
- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
Handoff policy:
Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.
Executor readiness:
- When accepted work mutates code, check
executor_readiness/v1 for the selected Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or oh-my runtime path before first dispatch.
- If readiness is
missing or blocked, ask the user to choose another coding agent, configure PATH, continue in Hermes, or keep a prompt/runtime handoff; retry only after that state changes.
- A readiness probe is not dispatch, implementation, verification, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
Delegation transparency:
- When delegating, show the composed delegate prompt in a fenced code block in the status message; truncate a long prompt to a bounded preview ending with
... [truncated, N chars total] — the user must see WHAT was asked, not just that something was.
- Name every delegated or parallel lane's model and, when the host exposes it, its reasoning effort inline as
(model effort) in status and briefing lines — including runtime-native subagents; when no effort is exposed, show the model alone as (model) rather than writing a placeholder like unknown beside a known model, and never emit empty parentheses. Carry token and elapsed figures the same way in these narration lines: report observed figures and omit unobserved ones — when the user asks for a figure directly, say it was not observed instead of omitting it; a rendered status-board column keeps its own unknown cell.
- Capture a resumable session or thread id at dispatch and report it in the status message: for non-interactive Claude Code pass
--output-format json and read session_id from the result (resume with claude -p --resume <session-id>); for Codex pass --json and read thread_id (resume with codex exec resume <thread-id>, repeating --skip-git-repo-check outside a git repo). Never leave a delegate run with no recorded way to resume or steer it — a plain-text one-shot that hides its session id strands the work when the run stalls or times out.
- Before dispatch, grant the executor session every permission the task will need — file write/edit, command/test execution, and the working directory — on the dispatch command itself, not through settings-file guesses: for non-interactive Claude Code pass
--permission-mode acceptEdits or an explicit --allowedTools list (--dangerously-skip-permissions only inside an isolated worktree or sandbox), and the equivalent sandbox/approval flags for other CLIs. acceptEdits: true is not a settings key and ~/.claude/settings.local.json is not a file Claude Code reads — user scope is ~/.claude/settings.json and project scope is <dispatch cwd>/.claude/settings.local.json with rules under permissions.allow. Prove the grant with a bounded scratch-edit probe run before the real dispatch: a permission denial in a non-interactive run recurs identically on retry, so never redispatch until a changed grant is proven, and surface an ungrantable permission as a blocker before dispatch, not after minutes of silence.
Required inputs:
- user request
- target context
- delivery or status expectation
- known missing evidence
Expected outputs:
- executor-runtime-readiness/v1 card or guidance
- next action
- prepared-vs-observed boundary
Artifact expectations:
- executor-runtime-readiness/v1 metadata-only runtime or wrapper card when recorded
Safety rules:
- Runtime readiness is not executor dispatch, plugin load, tool invocation, repository mutation, review, CI, or merge evidence.
- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.
Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: executor-runtime-readiness.
omh runtime record --skill executor-runtime-readiness --harness executor-runtime-readiness --status started
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
1---2name: omh-executor-runtime-readiness3description: [omh] Executor runtime readiness - compare Codex, Claude Code, Hermes coding, and oh-my runtimes by tools and handoff mode; use external-connector-readiness for a named plugin or API, and toolbelt-readiness for the whole capability inventory. Use when the user says: executor-runtime-readiness, executor readiness, runtime readiness, codex readiness, claude code readiness, hermes coding readiness, executor tools, missing tools.4---5
6# Executor Runtime Readiness
7
8This is a Hermes-native `executor-runtime-readiness` workflow skill.
9
10## Why This Exists
11
12`executor-runtime-readiness` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.
13
14## Do Not Use When
15
16- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
17- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
18- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
19
20## Examples
21
22Good example:
23
24- Prompt: executor-runtime-readiness can this task run in Codex, Claude Code, or Hermes coding?
25- Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_executor_runtime_readiness` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
26- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.
27
28Bad example:
29
30- Prompt: executor-runtime-readiness claim Codex already started the session.
31- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
32- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
33
34## Completion Checklist
35
36- The selected coding or runtime owner is named before any implementation claim.
37- Prepared handoff, dispatch, execution, verification, review, CI, and merge states are separated.
38- The final status cites observed runtime evidence or keeps the work prepared_not_observed.
39- When Hermes is the selected coding owner, use `hermes_coding_harness/v1` to keep builder, verifier, reviewer, docs, and PR lanes separate.
40- Report the current harness stage, owner, next action, and missing evidence without claiming PR creation, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge until matching runtime observations exist.
41
42## Recovery Notes
43
44- If the selected executor is unavailable, ask for Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or another runtime before retrying.
45- If dispatch or result evidence is missing, keep the handoff prepared_not_observed and expose the next observable action.
46
47## Workflow Lane
48
49- Current lane: **Coding handoff** (`idea-to-deploy`, `llm-app-dev`, `cto-loop`, `deploy-and-monitor`, `code-review`, `build-failure-triage`, `verification-gate`, `security-safety-review`, `+13 more`) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
50- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
51- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
52
53## Use When
54
55Use when a user may choose Codex, Claude Code, Hermes coding, or another runtime and needs tool/credential gaps before handoff.
56
57 Strong routing signals: `executor-runtime-readiness`, `executor readiness`, `runtime readiness`, `codex readiness`, `claude code readiness`, `hermes coding readiness`, `executor tools`, `missing tools`, `missing runtime tools`, `runtime tools`, `coding agent readiness`, `coding runtime`, `handoff mode`, `handoff readiness`, `codex or claude`, `codex vs claude`, `codex tools`, `claude code tools`, `hermes coding`, `agent runtime`, `subagent readiness`, `worktree readiness`, `runtime migration`, `omx`, `omc`, `omo`, `codex로 넘길지 claude`, `claude code로 넘길지 codex`, `codex랑 claude`, `claude code 중`, `넘길지 codex`, `넘길지 claude`, `코덱스`, `클로드 코드`, `헤르메스 코딩`, `코딩 에이전트`, `서브에이전트`, `작업트리`, `준비성`, `실행 런타임`, `어떤 런타임`, `런타임으로 넘겨`
58
59## Catalog Metadata
60
61Category: `executor-readiness`
62Phase: `runtime-selection`
63Hermes role: `handoff-guide`
64Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated`
65Reasoning demand: `light`
66
67Quality bar:
68
69- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
70- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
71- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
72
73Handoff policy:
74
75Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.
76
77Executor readiness:
78
79- When accepted work mutates code, check `executor_readiness/v1` for the selected Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or oh-my runtime path before first dispatch.
80- If readiness is `missing` or `blocked`, ask the user to choose another coding agent, configure PATH, continue in Hermes, or keep a prompt/runtime handoff; retry only after that state changes.
81- A readiness probe is not dispatch, implementation, verification, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
82
83Delegation transparency:
84
85- When delegating, show the composed delegate prompt in a fenced code block in the status message; truncate a long prompt to a bounded preview ending with `... [truncated, N chars total]` — the user must see WHAT was asked, not just that something was.
86- Name every delegated or parallel lane's model and, when the host exposes it, its reasoning effort inline as `(model effort)` in status and briefing lines — including runtime-native subagents; when no effort is exposed, show the model alone as `(model)` rather than writing a placeholder like `unknown` beside a known model, and never emit empty parentheses. Carry token and elapsed figures the same way in these narration lines: report observed figures and omit unobserved ones — when the user asks for a figure directly, say it was not observed instead of omitting it; a rendered status-board column keeps its own `unknown` cell.
87- Capture a resumable session or thread id at dispatch and report it in the status message: for non-interactive Claude Code pass `--output-format json` and read `session_id` from the result (resume with `claude -p --resume <session-id>`); for Codex pass `--json` and read `thread_id` (resume with `codex exec resume <thread-id>`, repeating `--skip-git-repo-check` outside a git repo). Never leave a delegate run with no recorded way to resume or steer it — a plain-text one-shot that hides its session id strands the work when the run stalls or times out.
88- Before dispatch, grant the executor session every permission the task will need — file write/edit, command/test execution, and the working directory — on the dispatch command itself, not through settings-file guesses: for non-interactive Claude Code pass `--permission-mode acceptEdits` or an explicit `--allowedTools` list (`--dangerously-skip-permissions` only inside an isolated worktree or sandbox), and the equivalent sandbox/approval flags for other CLIs. `acceptEdits: true` is not a settings key and `~/.claude/settings.local.json` is not a file Claude Code reads — user scope is `~/.claude/settings.json` and project scope is `<dispatch cwd>/.claude/settings.local.json` with rules under `permissions.allow`. Prove the grant with a bounded scratch-edit probe run before the real dispatch: a permission denial in a non-interactive run recurs identically on retry, so never redispatch until a changed grant is proven, and surface an ungrantable permission as a blocker before dispatch, not after minutes of silence.
89
90Required inputs:
91
92- user request
93- target context
94- delivery or status expectation
95- known missing evidence
96
97Expected outputs:
98
99- executor-runtime-readiness/v1 card or guidance
100- next action
101- prepared-vs-observed boundary
102
103Artifact expectations:
104
105- executor-runtime-readiness/v1 metadata-only runtime or wrapper card when recorded
106
107Safety rules:
108
109- Runtime readiness is not executor dispatch, plugin load, tool invocation, repository mutation, review, CI, or merge evidence.
110- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.
111
112## Runtime Evidence
113
114Preferred harness for this skill: `executor-runtime-readiness`.
115
116```sh
117omh runtime record --skill executor-runtime-readiness --harness executor-runtime-readiness --status started
118```
119
120Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
121Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
122- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
123Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
124
125Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
126
127Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.