OpenRouter Multi-Provider
Overview
OpenRouter's unified API lets you access models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral, and others with a single API key and endpoint. Model IDs use provider/model-name format. The same OpenAI SDK code works for any provider by simply changing the model ID. This skill covers provider comparison, cross-provider routing, feature normalization, and BYOK (Bring Your Own Key).
Prerequisites
- A single OpenRouter API key exported as
OPENROUTER_API_KEY — it covers every provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral); see the openrouter-install-auth skill for setup
curl and jq for the provider-landscape query
- Python 3.8+ with the OpenAI SDK (
pip install openai)
- For BYOK only: your own provider API key (e.g. an OpenAI key) added in the OpenRouter dashboard under Settings > Integrations > Add Provider Key
Instructions
- Survey what's on offer per Provider Landscape:
curl -s https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models | jq ... groups model IDs by their provider/ prefix and sorts by model count.
- Benchmark candidates with
compare_models() from Cross-Provider Comparison — the same prompt at temperature=0 across Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Meta, capturing latency, tokens, and the actual serving endpoint (response.model).
- Shortlist by task using the Provider Strength Matrix — Anthropic for analysis/long context, OpenAI for code and tool calling, Google for multimodal and 1M context, Meta for budget work, Mistral for European data residency.
- Pin or fail over per Provider-Specific Routing:
provider.order with allow_fallbacks: False forces one provider (e.g. for regulated data); allow_fallbacks: True fails across providers such as Anthropic → AWS Bedrock.
- For high-volume production, configure BYOK — requests route to your own provider key with the first 1M requests/month free, then 5% of normal provider cost.
- Smooth capability gaps with
normalized_completion() per Feature Normalization — JSON mode uses response_format natively on openai/ models and a system-prompt instruction elsewhere.
Provider Landscape
# List all providers and their model counts
curl -s https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models | jq '
[.data[].id | split("/")[0]] |
group_by(.) | map({provider: .[0], models: length}) |
sort_by(-.models)'
Cross-Provider Comparison
import os, time, json
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
def compare_models(prompt: str, models: list[str], max_tokens: int = 500) -> list[dict]:
"""Run the same prompt across multiple models and compare results."""
results = []
for model in models:
start = time.monotonic()
try:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
max_tokens=max_tokens,
temperature=0,
)
latency = (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000
results.append({
"model": model,
"served_by": response.model,
"content": response.choices[0].message.content[:200] + "...",
"tokens": response.usage.prompt_tokens + response.usage.completion_tokens,
"latency_ms": round(latency, 1),
"status": "ok",
})
except Exception as e:
results.append({"model": model, "status": "error", "error": str(e)})
return results
# Compare top-tier models on the same task
results = compare_models(
"Explain the CAP theorem in distributed systems",
models=[
"anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet", # Anthropic
"openai/gpt-4o", # OpenAI
"google/gemini-2.0-flash-001", # Google
"meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct", # Meta (open-source)
],
)
for r in results:
print(f"{r['model']}: {r.get('latency_ms', 'N/A')}ms, {r.get('tokens', 'N/A')} tokens")
Provider Strength Matrix
| Provider |
Best For |
Example Models |
Price Range |
| Anthropic |
Analysis, safety, long context |
claude-3.5-sonnet, claude-3-haiku |
$0.25-$15/1M |
| OpenAI |
Code generation, tool calling |
gpt-4o, gpt-4o-mini, o1 |
$0.15-$60/1M |
| Google |
Multimodal, huge context (1M) |
gemini-2.0-flash-001, gemini-pro |
$0.075-$7/1M |
| Meta |
Budget tasks, self-hosting |
llama-3.1-8b-instruct, llama-3.1-70b-instruct |
$0.06-$0.90/1M |
| Mistral |
European data residency, code |
mistral-large, mixtral-8x7b |
$0.24-$8/1M |
Provider-Specific Routing
# Force specific provider for a model
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
max_tokens=200,
extra_body={
"provider": {
"order": ["Anthropic"], # Direct to Anthropic
"allow_fallbacks": False, # Don't fall back to other providers
},
},
)
# Cross-provider fallback: if Anthropic is down, try via AWS Bedrock
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
max_tokens=200,
extra_body={
"provider": {
"order": ["Anthropic", "AWS Bedrock"],
"allow_fallbacks": True,
},
},
)
BYOK (Bring Your Own Key)
# Use your own provider API key through OpenRouter
# Configure BYOK in the OpenRouter dashboard:
# Settings > Integrations > Add Provider Key
# Benefits:
# - First 1M requests/month free via OpenRouter
# - After that, 5% of normal provider cost (vs full OpenRouter markup)
# - Data flows directly to provider under your account
# - Useful for high-volume production workloads
# With BYOK configured, requests automatically use your provider key
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="openai/gpt-4o", # Uses YOUR OpenAI key, routed through OpenRouter
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
max_tokens=200,
)
Feature Normalization
def normalized_completion(messages, model, **kwargs):
"""Handle provider-specific feature differences."""
# JSON mode: OpenAI native, others via system prompt
if kwargs.pop("json_mode", False):
if model.startswith("openai/"):
kwargs["response_format"] = {"type": "json_object"}
else:
# Add JSON instruction to system prompt for non-OpenAI models
messages = [{"role": "system", "content": "Respond in valid JSON only."}] + [
m for m in messages if m["role"] != "system"
] + [m for m in messages if m["role"] == "system"]
return client.chat.completions.create(model=model, messages=messages, **kwargs)
Output
- Comparison result rows per model:
served_by (the endpoint that actually answered), truncated content, token totals, latency_ms, and status (ok or the error)
- A provider census from the jq query:
{provider, models} objects sorted by model count, showing which namespaces dominate the catalog
- Completions attributed to their exact serving provider via
response.model — the raw material for cost/quality attribution across providers
Examples
One prompt — "Explain what an API gateway is in 2 sentences." — fanned across four providers through the same client produces a directly comparable scoreboard:
[OpenAI] 450ms, 65 tokens — ok
[Anthropic] 380ms, 58 tokens — ok
[Google] 620ms, 71 tokens — ok
[Meta] 510ms, 63 tokens — ok
Anthropic answered fastest with the fewest tokens on this run; the point is that switching providers cost zero code changes beyond the model ID. More worked examples: references/examples.md.
Error Handling
| Error |
Cause |
Fix |
| Feature not supported |
Provider lacks capability (e.g., tools on Llama) |
Check model capabilities via /models; use fallback |
| Different response quality |
Providers trained differently |
Test critical prompts per model; adjust system prompts |
| Provider outage |
Single provider down |
Use provider.order with fallbacks across providers |
| BYOK auth failure |
Provider key expired or invalid |
Update provider key in OpenRouter dashboard |
Enterprise Considerations
- OpenRouter normalizes the API, but models differ in output quality, feature support, and data policies
- Use
provider.order + allow_fallbacks: true for cross-provider resilience
- Test the same prompts across providers during evaluation; don't assume equal quality
- BYOK eliminates OpenRouter margin for high-volume workloads (5% vs standard markup)
- Route regulated data only to approved providers using
allow_fallbacks: false
- Monitor which provider actually serves each request (
response.model) for attribution
References
1---2name: openrouter-multi-provider3description: Use multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta) through OpenRouter's unified API. Use when comparing providers, building cross-provider workflows, or maximizing availability. Triggers: 'openrouter providers', 'multi provider', 'openrouter openai anthropic', 'compare models openrouter'.4license: MIT5---6# OpenRouter Multi-Provider
7
8## Overview
9
10OpenRouter's unified API lets you access models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral, and others with a single API key and endpoint. Model IDs use `provider/model-name` format. The same OpenAI SDK code works for any provider by simply changing the model ID. This skill covers provider comparison, cross-provider routing, feature normalization, and BYOK (Bring Your Own Key).
11
12## Prerequisites
13
14- A single OpenRouter API key exported as `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` — it covers every provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral); see the `openrouter-install-auth` skill for setup
15- `curl` and `jq` for the provider-landscape query
16- Python 3.8+ with the OpenAI SDK (`pip install openai`)
17- For BYOK only: your own provider API key (e.g. an OpenAI key) added in the OpenRouter dashboard under Settings > Integrations > Add Provider Key
18
19## Instructions
20
211. Survey what's on offer per Provider Landscape: `curl -s https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models | jq ...` groups model IDs by their `provider/` prefix and sorts by model count.
222. Benchmark candidates with `compare_models()` from Cross-Provider Comparison — the same prompt at `temperature=0` across Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Meta, capturing latency, tokens, and the actual serving endpoint (`response.model`).
233. Shortlist by task using the Provider Strength Matrix — Anthropic for analysis/long context, OpenAI for code and tool calling, Google for multimodal and 1M context, Meta for budget work, Mistral for European data residency.
244. Pin or fail over per Provider-Specific Routing: `provider.order` with `allow_fallbacks: False` forces one provider (e.g. for regulated data); `allow_fallbacks: True` fails across providers such as Anthropic → AWS Bedrock.
255. For high-volume production, configure BYOK — requests route to your own provider key with the first 1M requests/month free, then 5% of normal provider cost.
266. Smooth capability gaps with `normalized_completion()` per Feature Normalization — JSON mode uses `response_format` natively on `openai/` models and a system-prompt instruction elsewhere.
27
28## Provider Landscape
29
30```bash
31# List all providers and their model counts
32curl -s https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models | jq '
33 [.data[].id | split("/")[0]] |
34 group_by(.) | map({provider: .[0], models: length}) |
35 sort_by(-.models)'
36```
37
38## Cross-Provider Comparison
39
40```python
41import os, time, json
42from openai import OpenAI
43
44client = OpenAI(
45 base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
46 api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
47 default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
48)
49
50def compare_models(prompt: str, models: list[str], max_tokens: int = 500) -> list[dict]:
51 """Run the same prompt across multiple models and compare results."""
52 results = []
53 for model in models:
54 start = time.monotonic()
55 try:
56 response = client.chat.completions.create(
57 model=model,
58 messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
59 max_tokens=max_tokens,
60 temperature=0,
61 )
62 latency = (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000
63 results.append({
64 "model": model,
65 "served_by": response.model,
66 "content": response.choices[0].message.content[:200] + "...",
67 "tokens": response.usage.prompt_tokens + response.usage.completion_tokens,
68 "latency_ms": round(latency, 1),
69 "status": "ok",
70 })
71 except Exception as e:
72 results.append({"model": model, "status": "error", "error": str(e)})
73
74 return results
75
76# Compare top-tier models on the same task
77results = compare_models(
78 "Explain the CAP theorem in distributed systems",
79 models=[
80 "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet", # Anthropic
81 "openai/gpt-4o", # OpenAI
82 "google/gemini-2.0-flash-001", # Google
83 "meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct", # Meta (open-source)
84 ],
85)
86for r in results:
87 print(f"{r['model']}: {r.get('latency_ms', 'N/A')}ms, {r.get('tokens', 'N/A')} tokens")
88```
89
90## Provider Strength Matrix
91
92| Provider | Best For | Example Models | Price Range |
93|----------|----------|---------------|-------------|
94| Anthropic | Analysis, safety, long context | `claude-3.5-sonnet`, `claude-3-haiku` | $0.25-$15/1M |
95| OpenAI | Code generation, tool calling | `gpt-4o`, `gpt-4o-mini`, `o1` | $0.15-$60/1M |
96| Google | Multimodal, huge context (1M) | `gemini-2.0-flash-001`, `gemini-pro` | $0.075-$7/1M |
97| Meta | Budget tasks, self-hosting | `llama-3.1-8b-instruct`, `llama-3.1-70b-instruct` | $0.06-$0.90/1M |
98| Mistral | European data residency, code | `mistral-large`, `mixtral-8x7b` | $0.24-$8/1M |
99
100## Provider-Specific Routing
101
102```python
103# Force specific provider for a model
104response = client.chat.completions.create(
105 model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
106 messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
107 max_tokens=200,
108 extra_body={
109 "provider": {
110 "order": ["Anthropic"], # Direct to Anthropic
111 "allow_fallbacks": False, # Don't fall back to other providers
112 },
113 },
114)
115
116# Cross-provider fallback: if Anthropic is down, try via AWS Bedrock
117response = client.chat.completions.create(
118 model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
119 messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
120 max_tokens=200,
121 extra_body={
122 "provider": {
123 "order": ["Anthropic", "AWS Bedrock"],
124 "allow_fallbacks": True,
125 },
126 },
127)
128```
129
130## BYOK (Bring Your Own Key)
131
132```python
133# Use your own provider API key through OpenRouter
134# Configure BYOK in the OpenRouter dashboard:
135# Settings > Integrations > Add Provider Key
136
137# Benefits:
138# - First 1M requests/month free via OpenRouter
139# - After that, 5% of normal provider cost (vs full OpenRouter markup)
140# - Data flows directly to provider under your account
141# - Useful for high-volume production workloads
142
143# With BYOK configured, requests automatically use your provider key
144response = client.chat.completions.create(
145 model="openai/gpt-4o", # Uses YOUR OpenAI key, routed through OpenRouter
146 messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
147 max_tokens=200,
148)
149```
150
151## Feature Normalization
152
153```python
154def normalized_completion(messages, model, **kwargs):
155 """Handle provider-specific feature differences."""
156 # JSON mode: OpenAI native, others via system prompt
157 if kwargs.pop("json_mode", False):
158 if model.startswith("openai/"):
159 kwargs["response_format"] = {"type": "json_object"}
160 else:
161 # Add JSON instruction to system prompt for non-OpenAI models
162 messages = [{"role": "system", "content": "Respond in valid JSON only."}] + [
163 m for m in messages if m["role"] != "system"
164 ] + [m for m in messages if m["role"] == "system"]
165
166 return client.chat.completions.create(model=model, messages=messages, **kwargs)
167```
168
169## Output
170
171- Comparison result rows per model: `served_by` (the endpoint that actually answered), truncated `content`, token totals, `latency_ms`, and `status` (`ok` or the error)
172- A provider census from the jq query: `{provider, models}` objects sorted by model count, showing which namespaces dominate the catalog
173- Completions attributed to their exact serving provider via `response.model` — the raw material for cost/quality attribution across providers
174
175## Examples
176
177One prompt — "Explain what an API gateway is in 2 sentences." — fanned across four providers through the same client produces a directly comparable scoreboard:
178
179```text
180[OpenAI] 450ms, 65 tokens — ok
181[Anthropic] 380ms, 58 tokens — ok
182[Google] 620ms, 71 tokens — ok
183[Meta] 510ms, 63 tokens — ok
184```
185
186Anthropic answered fastest with the fewest tokens on this run; the point is that switching providers cost zero code changes beyond the model ID. More worked examples: `references/examples.md`.
187
188## Error Handling
189
190| Error | Cause | Fix |
191|-------|-------|-----|
192| Feature not supported | Provider lacks capability (e.g., tools on Llama) | Check model capabilities via `/models`; use fallback |
193| Different response quality | Providers trained differently | Test critical prompts per model; adjust system prompts |
194| Provider outage | Single provider down | Use `provider.order` with fallbacks across providers |
195| BYOK auth failure | Provider key expired or invalid | Update provider key in OpenRouter dashboard |
196
197## Enterprise Considerations
198
199- OpenRouter normalizes the API, but models differ in output quality, feature support, and data policies
200- Use `provider.order` + `allow_fallbacks: true` for cross-provider resilience
201- Test the same prompts across providers during evaluation; don't assume equal quality
202- BYOK eliminates OpenRouter margin for high-volume workloads (5% vs standard markup)
203- Route regulated data only to approved providers using `allow_fallbacks: false`
204- Monitor which provider actually serves each request (`response.model`) for attribution
205
206## References
207
208- Examples | Errors
209- [Supported Providers](https://openrouter.ai/models) | [Provider Routing](https://openrouter.ai/docs/features/provider-routing)