Purple Cow Audit
Quality gate for affiliate marketers: score a product's remarkability 1-10 before promoting it. Based on Seth Godin's Purple Cow — if the product isn't remarkable, no amount of marketing skill will make it convert sustainably. The key question: "Would I recommend this to a friend WITHOUT earning a commission?"
Stage
S1: Research — Evaluating a program's worthiness IS part of research and discovery. This is a quality gate before you invest time creating content, landing pages, and email sequences.
When to Use
- User is considering promoting a specific product
- User asks "is this product worth promoting?"
- User wants to evaluate product quality before investing time
- User says "purple cow", "remarkable", "audit", "evaluate", "quality check"
- Before investing time in S2-S5 skills for a specific product
- User has a list of programs from
affiliate-program-searchand needs to pick the best
Input Schema
product: # REQUIRED
name: string # Product name
url: string # Product website
description: string # OPTIONAL — what it does
reward_value: string # OPTIONAL — commission rate
tags: string[] # OPTIONAL — categories
comparison_products: string[] # OPTIONAL — competitors to compare against
# Default: auto-discovered
Chaining from S1 affiliate-program-search: If run, evaluate the recommended_program.
Workflow
Step 1: Research the Product
web_search:"[product] review 2024 2025"— find recent reviewsweb_search:"[product] vs" OR "[product] alternative"— find competitorsweb_search:"[product] complaints" OR "[product] problems"— find issues- Check product website for: pricing transparency, unique features, social proof
Step 2: Score Remarkability
Rate each dimension 1-10:
| Dimension | Question | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Uniqueness | Does it do something no competitor does? | 20% |
| Quality | Is it genuinely excellent at its core job? | 20% |
| Story | Does using it make you feel/look different? | 15% |
| Word of mouth | Would users tell friends unprompted? | 15% |
| Design | Is the experience delightful, not just functional? | 10% |
| Problem fit | Does it solve a real, painful problem? | 10% |
| Trust | Transparent pricing, good support, real social proof? | 10% |
Composite score = weighted average (1-10)
Step 3: Make Recommendation
Based on composite score:
- 8-10: PROMOTE — This is a Purple Cow. Go all in.
- 6-7: PROMOTE WITH ANGLE — Good product, needs strong positioning. Identify your unique angle.
- 4-5: CAUTION — Mediocre product. Only promote if commission is exceptional AND you can add significant value through bonuses.
- 1-3: SKIP — Not remarkable. Promoting this will damage your reputation. Find an alternative.
Step 4: Identify Remarkable Angles
For products scoring 6+, identify:
- The 1-2 features that ARE remarkable (Purple Cow elements)
- The angles that make it share-worthy
- The audience segment for whom this IS a Purple Cow (even if not for everyone)
Step 5: Self-Validation
- Score is evidence-based (cited reviews, features, data)
- Recommendation is honest (not inflated by high commission)
- Remarkable angles are specific (not generic praise)
- Comparison with competitors is fair
- The "would I recommend without commission" test was honestly applied
Output Schema
output_schema_version: "1.0.0"
purple_cow_audit:
product_name: string
composite_score: number # 1-10 weighted
recommendation: string # "promote" | "promote_with_angle" | "caution" | "skip"
scores:
uniqueness: number
quality: number
story: number
word_of_mouth: number
design: number
problem_fit: number
trust: number
remarkable_angles: string[] # What makes it a Purple Cow (for 6+)
red_flags: string[] # Concerns identified
alternative_products: string[] # Better options if score < 6
remarkability_score: number # Alias for composite_score (for chaining)
chain_metadata:
skill_slug: "purple-cow-audit"
stage: "research"
timestamp: string
suggested_next:
- "affiliate-program-search"
- "grand-slam-offer"
- "viral-post-writer"
- "monopoly-niche-finder"
Output Format
## Purple Cow Audit: [Product Name]
### The Question
Would I recommend [product] to a friend WITHOUT earning a commission?
**Answer:** [Yes/No/With caveats]
### Remarkability Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Uniqueness | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| Quality | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| Story | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| Word of Mouth | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| Design | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| Problem Fit | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| Trust | X/10 | [specific evidence] |
| **Composite** | **X/10** | |
### Recommendation: [PROMOTE / PROMOTE WITH ANGLE / CAUTION / SKIP]
[Reasoning — 2-3 sentences]
### Remarkable Angles (what to emphasize)
1. [Specific remarkable feature/aspect]
2. [Specific remarkable feature/aspect]
### Red Flags (what to be honest about)
1. [Concern]
2. [Concern]
### If Score < 6: Better Alternatives
- [Alternative 1] — [why it's more remarkable]
- [Alternative 2] — [why it's more remarkable]
Error Handling
- No product provided: "Tell me the product name and I'll audit its remarkability. Or run
affiliate-program-searchfirst." - Product is too new/no reviews: Score based on available data, flag low confidence. "Limited data — revisit this audit in 3 months."
- User disagrees with score: "The score is a starting framework. If you have personal experience that changes the picture, tell me and I'll adjust."
- No alternatives found: Suggest running
affiliate-program-searchin the same category.
Examples
Example 1: "Is HeyGen worth promoting?" → Research reviews, features, competitors. Score across 7 dimensions. Result: 8/10 PROMOTE — remarkable for AI avatar quality, unique lip-sync tech, strong word of mouth.
Example 2: "Evaluate these 3 programs from my search results" → Score all 3 side-by-side. Compare composite scores. Recommend the Purple Cow.
Example 3: "Should I promote this random SaaS tool?" (generic tool, many competitors) → Research reveals: 5/10 CAUTION — competent but unremarkable. 4 competitors do the same thing. Suggest finding a more remarkable alternative or targeting a micro-audience where it IS remarkable.
Flywheel Connections
Feeds Into
grand-slam-offer(S4) — remarkable angles become the offer's core messagingviral-post-writer(S2) — remarkable elements are what makes content shareableaffiliate-blog-builder(S3) — audit insights inform honest review contentlanding-page-creator(S4) — remarkable features highlighted on the page
Fed By
affiliate-program-search(S1) — products to evaluatecompetitor-spy(S1) — competitive landscape for comparison
Feedback Loop
ab-test-generator(S6) reveals which remarkable angles resonate with audience → refine what "remarkable" means for your specific audience
References
shared/references/case-studies.md— Real affiliate success storiesshared/references/affiliate-glossary.md— Terminologyshared/references/flywheel-connections.md— Master connection map