Research Ideation Full
Use this skill when the user wants a full ideation pipeline grounded in one seed paper, not just a few brainstorming bullets.
Goal
Turn one seed paper into a structured research ideation report by emulating the five-stage ideation workflow:
- Hypothesis Generation
- Feasibility Review
- Experiment Design
- Review
- Final Synthesis
Workflow
- Identify the seed paper. If the paper is not identifiable, ask for the title, URL, or PDF link.
- Use
readPaper to ground the ideation in the full paper whenever possible.
- If the user provided a seed idea or direction, incorporate it explicitly into the ideation process.
- Use
searchArticles when you need related work, benchmarks, datasets, or neighboring methods to assess novelty or feasibility.
- Run the stages in order and make the stage boundaries visible in the answer.
Stage Expectations
Hypothesis Generation
- Generate
3-5 concrete, testable hypotheses.
- For each hypothesis include:
- statement
- rationale
- novelty
- connection to the seed paper
- estimated impact
- supporting references (at least 1 per hypothesis, retrieved via
searchArticles)
Feasibility Review
- For each hypothesis assess:
- data availability
- compute requirements
- methodological readiness
- timeline
- key risks
- Rate each one:
Highly Feasible
Feasible with Effort
Challenging
Infeasible
Experiment Design
- Select the top
2 most promising and feasible hypotheses.
- For each one provide:
- protocol
- baselines
- controls and ablations
- metrics
- expected outcomes
- minimum viable experiment
- timeline
- key references (cite the source for each baseline method and any adopted protocol, retrieved via
searchArticles)
Review
- Critique the full plan for logical gaps, ethical concerns, statistical issues, missing baselines, and scope problems.
- For each criticism, propose a concrete improvement.
Final Report
Use this exact structure:
Research Ideation Report
1. Paper Snapshot
2. Generated Hypotheses
3. Experiment Plans
4. Review Findings
5. Recommended Actions
6. Overall Assessment
7. References
Quality Rules
- Ground every idea in the seed paper or cited external evidence retrieved via
searchArticles. Model-memory citations are forbidden.
- Mark speculation explicitly when it goes beyond the paper.
- Prefer testable and executable ideas over vague ambition.
- If paper text is unavailable, say that the ideation is based on limited context.
Citation Policy
- Every hypothesis rationale, related-work claim, baseline reference, and methodology mention MUST include a citation retrieved via
searchArticles. Do NOT cite from memory.
- Use
searchArticles proactively at the start of each hypothesis to locate supporting and contrasting literature before writing the rationale.
- If
searchArticles returns no relevant result for a claim, mark the claim explicitly as: [Unverified — no supporting reference found via search].
- Do not silently drop unreferenced claims; either find a reference or flag it.
- The seed paper itself must also be cited formally using the same format.
Inline Citation & Reference Format
Use numbered inline citations in the text body (e.g., [1], [2]) and collect full references in the ## 7. References section. All references MUST be rendered in markdown so they are clickable and well-formatted:
Inline example:
近期研究表明,基于扩散模型的分子生成方法在 drug-likeness 指标上显著优于传统 VAE 方法 [1],同时在合成可达性方面也有改善 [2]。
References section example:
## 7. References
1. **Xu, M. et al.** (2022). *GeoDiff: A Geometric Diffusion Model for Molecular Conformation Generation.* ICLR 2022. [arXiv:2203.02923](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02923)
2. **Hoogeboom, E. et al.** (2022). *Equivariant Diffusion for Molecule Generation in 3D.* ICML 2022. [arXiv:2203.17003](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.17003)
- Each reference line MUST include: Author(s) (Year). Title. Venue/Journal. Linked DOI or URL when available from
searchArticles.
- Use markdown bold for authors, italic for title, and
[text](url) for clickable DOI/URL links.
- Number references sequentially as they first appear in the text.
1---2name: research-ideation-full3description: Use when the user wants the full research ideation workflow grounded in one seed paper, including complete ideation, feasibility review, experiment planning, and final synthesis, or makes an equivalent ideation request in another language.4---5
6# Research Ideation Full
7
8Use this skill when the user wants a full ideation pipeline grounded in one seed paper, not just a few brainstorming bullets.
9
10## Goal
11
12Turn one seed paper into a structured research ideation report by emulating the five-stage ideation workflow:
13
141. Hypothesis Generation
152. Feasibility Review
163. Experiment Design
174. Review
185. Final Synthesis
19
20## Workflow
21
221. Identify the seed paper. If the paper is not identifiable, ask for the title, URL, or PDF link.
232. Use `readPaper` to ground the ideation in the full paper whenever possible.
243. If the user provided a seed idea or direction, incorporate it explicitly into the ideation process.
254. Use `searchArticles` when you need related work, benchmarks, datasets, or neighboring methods to assess novelty or feasibility.
265. Run the stages in order and make the stage boundaries visible in the answer.
27
28## Stage Expectations
29
30### Hypothesis Generation
31
32- Generate `3-5` concrete, testable hypotheses.
33- For each hypothesis include:
34 - statement
35 - rationale
36 - novelty
37 - connection to the seed paper
38 - estimated impact
39 - supporting references (at least 1 per hypothesis, retrieved via `searchArticles`)
40
41### Feasibility Review
42
43- For each hypothesis assess:
44 - data availability
45 - compute requirements
46 - methodological readiness
47 - timeline
48 - key risks
49- Rate each one:
50 - `Highly Feasible`
51 - `Feasible with Effort`
52 - `Challenging`
53 - `Infeasible`
54
55### Experiment Design
56
57- Select the top `2` most promising and feasible hypotheses.
58- For each one provide:
59 - protocol
60 - baselines
61 - controls and ablations
62 - metrics
63 - expected outcomes
64 - minimum viable experiment
65 - timeline
66 - key references (cite the source for each baseline method and any adopted protocol, retrieved via `searchArticles`)
67
68### Review
69
70- Critique the full plan for logical gaps, ethical concerns, statistical issues, missing baselines, and scope problems.
71- For each criticism, propose a concrete improvement.
72
73### Final Report
74
75Use this exact structure:
76
77# Research Ideation Report
78
79## 1. Paper Snapshot
80## 2. Generated Hypotheses
81## 3. Experiment Plans
82## 4. Review Findings
83## 5. Recommended Actions
84## 6. Overall Assessment
85## 7. References
86
87## Quality Rules
88
89- Ground every idea in the seed paper or cited external evidence retrieved via `searchArticles`. Model-memory citations are forbidden.
90- Mark speculation explicitly when it goes beyond the paper.
91- Prefer testable and executable ideas over vague ambition.
92- If paper text is unavailable, say that the ideation is based on limited context.
93
94## Citation Policy
95
96- Every hypothesis rationale, related-work claim, baseline reference, and methodology mention MUST include a citation retrieved via `searchArticles`. Do NOT cite from memory.
97- Use `searchArticles` proactively at the start of each hypothesis to locate supporting and contrasting literature before writing the rationale.
98- If `searchArticles` returns no relevant result for a claim, mark the claim explicitly as: **[Unverified — no supporting reference found via search]**.
99- Do not silently drop unreferenced claims; either find a reference or flag it.
100- The seed paper itself must also be cited formally using the same format.
101
102### Inline Citation & Reference Format
103
104Use numbered inline citations in the text body (e.g., `[1]`, `[2]`) and collect full references in the `## 7. References` section. All references MUST be rendered in markdown so they are clickable and well-formatted:
105
106**Inline example:**
107> 近期研究表明,基于扩散模型的分子生成方法在 drug-likeness 指标上显著优于传统 VAE 方法 **[1]**,同时在合成可达性方面也有改善 **[2]**。
108
109**References section example:**
110
111```
112## 7. References
113
1141. **Xu, M. et al.** (2022). *GeoDiff: A Geometric Diffusion Model for Molecular Conformation Generation.* ICLR 2022. [arXiv:2203.02923](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02923)
1152. **Hoogeboom, E. et al.** (2022). *Equivariant Diffusion for Molecule Generation in 3D.* ICML 2022. [arXiv:2203.17003](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.17003)
116```
117
118- Each reference line MUST include: **Author(s)** (Year). *Title.* Venue/Journal. Linked DOI or URL when available from `searchArticles`.
119- Use markdown bold for authors, italic for title, and `[text](url)` for clickable DOI/URL links.
120- Number references sequentially as they first appear in the text.