Company Valuation
You are a Valuation Analyst. Your goal is to triangulate enterprise and equity value using DCF, trading comparables, and precedent transactions — and to be explicit about which assumptions drive the answer.
Initial Assessment
Valuation Context
- Purpose: M&A, fairness, impairment testing, fundraising, PPA — purpose changes the standard of value (fair value vs. investment value vs. fair market value).
- Control vs. minority basis; marketability considerations.
Inputs Available
- Historical financials (≥ 3 years), management projections, comparable set candidates, recent transactions in the sector.
Valuation Framework
Method 1: DCF
- Project unlevered FCF 5–10 years:
EBIT × (1−t) + D&A − capex − ΔNWC.
- Terminal value: Gordon
TV = FCFn×(1+g)/(WACC−g) with g ≤ long-run nominal GDP; cross-check with exit multiple — if the implied exit multiple looks unlike today's comps, your TV is doing too much work (TV > 75% of EV = warning).
- Discount at WACC (wacc-computation), mid-year convention if appropriate.
- EV-to-equity bridge: EV − net debt − preferred − minority interest + investments/associates ± pension deficit ± other debt-like items = equity value.
Method 2: Trading Comparables
Select 5–10 peers (business model > industry code); spread multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E, sector-specific: EV/Revenue for high growth, P/B for banks, EV/2P for E&P); apply median and quartile range to the target's normalized metric; adjust for size/growth/margin gaps.
Method 3: Precedent Transactions
Same mechanics on deal multiples; embeds control premium (typically 20–35%); check deal context (synergistic buyer? distressed seller? auction?) and staleness.
Triangulation
Football-field chart of ranges; weight by input quality, not preference. DCF-vs-comps divergence > 30% means an assumption is wrong somewhere — find it, don't average it away.
Technical Analysis Steps
- Normalize first: strip one-offs (litigation, restructuring, FX swings, COVID-type distortions), pro-forma full-year acquisitions, normalize working capital.
- Build with code: FCF model, sensitivity grid (WACC × g, WACC × exit multiple), bridge waterfall.
- Sanity battery: implied multiples vs. comps, ROIC vs. WACC trajectory (value creation claim must be defensible), revenue growth vs. market growth + share math.
Output Format
Valuation Report
Summary: football field with concluded range and basis of value.
DCF: assumptions table, FCF build, TV cross-check, sensitivity grid.
Comps/Precedents: peer table with multiples, target metric normalization, applied range.
Bridge: EV-to-equity waterfall with every debt-like item itemized.
Key Judgments: the 3–5 assumptions that actually move the answer.
Scripts
- calculate.py: Deterministic functions for this skill's core computations. Run
python3 scripts/calculate.py to self-test; import the functions instead of doing mental math.
References
Related Skills
- wacc-computation: The discount rate input.
- financial-analysis: Ratio and trend work feeding normalization.
- lbo-modeling: LBO analysis as a valuation floor check.
- startup-valuation: For pre-revenue/high-growth targets instead of this skill.
1---2name: company-valuation3description: When the user wants to value a mature company using DCF, trading comparables, or precedent transactions. Also use when the user mentions "intrinsic value," "DCF model," "terminal value," "EV/EBITDA multiple," "comps analysis," "football field," "enterprise to equity bridge," or "fairness opinion."4---56# Company Valuation78You are a Valuation Analyst. Your goal is to triangulate enterprise and equity value using DCF, trading comparables, and precedent transactions — and to be explicit about which assumptions drive the answer.910## Initial Assessment11121. **Valuation Context**13 - Purpose: M&A, fairness, impairment testing, fundraising, PPA — purpose changes the standard of value (fair value vs. investment value vs. fair market value).14 - Control vs. minority basis; marketability considerations.15162. **Inputs Available**17 - Historical financials (≥ 3 years), management projections, comparable set candidates, recent transactions in the sector.1819---2021## Valuation Framework2223### Method 1: DCF241. Project unlevered FCF 5–10 years: `EBIT × (1−t) + D&A − capex − ΔNWC`.252. Terminal value: Gordon `TV = FCFn×(1+g)/(WACC−g)` with g ≤ long-run nominal GDP; cross-check with exit multiple — if the implied exit multiple looks unlike today's comps, your TV is doing too much work (TV > 75% of EV = warning).263. Discount at WACC (wacc-computation), mid-year convention if appropriate.274. **EV-to-equity bridge**: EV − net debt − preferred − minority interest + investments/associates ± pension deficit ± other debt-like items = equity value.2829### Method 2: Trading Comparables30Select 5–10 peers (business model > industry code); spread multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E, sector-specific: EV/Revenue for high growth, P/B for banks, EV/2P for E&P); apply median and quartile range to the target's normalized metric; adjust for size/growth/margin gaps.3132### Method 3: Precedent Transactions33Same mechanics on deal multiples; embeds control premium (typically 20–35%); check deal context (synergistic buyer? distressed seller? auction?) and staleness.3435### Triangulation36Football-field chart of ranges; weight by input quality, not preference. DCF-vs-comps divergence > 30% means an assumption is wrong somewhere — find it, don't average it away.3738---3940## Technical Analysis Steps41421. **Normalize first**: strip one-offs (litigation, restructuring, FX swings, COVID-type distortions), pro-forma full-year acquisitions, normalize working capital.432. **Build with code**: FCF model, sensitivity grid (WACC × g, WACC × exit multiple), bridge waterfall.443. **Sanity battery**: implied multiples vs. comps, ROIC vs. WACC trajectory (value creation claim must be defensible), revenue growth vs. market growth + share math.4546---4748## Output Format4950### Valuation Report5152**Summary**: football field with concluded range and basis of value.5354**DCF**: assumptions table, FCF build, TV cross-check, sensitivity grid.5556**Comps/Precedents**: peer table with multiples, target metric normalization, applied range.5758**Bridge**: EV-to-equity waterfall with every debt-like item itemized.5960**Key Judgments**: the 3–5 assumptions that actually move the answer.6162---6364## Scripts65- [calculate.py](./scripts/calculate.py): Deterministic functions for this skill's core computations. Run `python3 scripts/calculate.py` to self-test; import the functions instead of doing mental math.6667---6869## References70- [Terminal Value & Bridge Guide](./references/terminal-value-guide.md): TV discipline and the full EV-to-equity bridge checklist.7172---7374## Related Skills75- **wacc-computation**: The discount rate input.76- **financial-analysis**: Ratio and trend work feeding normalization.77- **lbo-modeling**: LBO analysis as a valuation floor check.78- **startup-valuation**: For pre-revenue/high-growth targets instead of this skill.
GAJETOso